Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 22BC7380000B9; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:55:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QWqXu-0008Bk-5m for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:54:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QWqXt-0008Bb-6r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:54:13 +0100 Received: from nm26-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.230]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QWqXq-0006Wq-Hf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:54:13 +0100 Received: from [98.139.91.62] by nm26.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 13:54:02 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.3] by tm2.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 13:54:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1003.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jun 2011 13:54:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 228221.78670.bm@omp1003.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 49607 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Jun 2011 13:54:01 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1308146041; bh=7wWeJCa7wbdH+Fw2EKZKx/IqCPxPvxQ4AXzqw1bnHTc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=g0BClSLA3MggNZ+SStwJywPXYEbc3KwAtnIwsRi/23ZUDqi+sZu0xwRlVdj0RiX16GyOLfLvfLMKzF4DmWmakRB25m7SKdtdmLDMBKpf5IFmoPkxSp+uOeFokzCXDI6WFYQlaGd3Re1PqtCrjvHJl3LyUZtCHqoBn7xYyfp7qaY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i5cqf2LxJEbP8HnmWw8jcPCrXsl49sW2mzUAmy/kRcKeIbmmdDqpBgXkSHPhj6/gvWn99oyxDHzFtVM8fMywBpXFf6WXVWRHE2QZ0px0+EtPoEOT58Sem8Oomg7EN3GwcoApGFNXsMwk5T9xRq32zo3Vbx2svyG++NwWI2sufkM=; Message-ID: <718580.48029.qm@web111912.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: BEwb8aAVM1m0Wkx7LpaaOsVpNkm8l3tdf.HeQEVXdnRv8vG e_qeoZFMr8IGc7ZWM_oLkFJJXysOUyPHdsSNw4BDStzXRID8CwP2bH.EZrnr 3YEDTtG50onVs4FYwpnfRq9Z1ttU.sVTyl6K60YUnpL_XpSpl9rY7nH9X9a7 lK927EpAkcaYvcoJO4GdvBqMCdugImYsQtrCCRAvs5QjN3XC31FX0j8m8Jh6 OlOR7LUjwQATWlUB7cjU_YuD7F1ZyVqg1jf.10mS2GHuO3brv6sBKkbEZgAC NpIc0b82hJeUn3X_XwNVesbQddiF0FbH4aZXILI1lpJSxxZQsLX9mPXB_xMI d7JfSFNhJv9UwBS3i0EydjeeyD3tN7wOszjjGPNog2UQHwse1U_yqWn27_9W BBAUnIQ4_nUSHaiFwzoQOjMG5_INliGu0Q3VrWpjpqj6Et4LIgyGnr24RFpr sS4CEt.38vrTpxD3fNZLn3RExP3P2intwfvvDwgxCmHlQzZMsGQif8DxcSSj VMh6Lrk.MSJrwVUnUqGfx0fSUCml68clj9LBp.sfK63b6_hFOZG5eeofAh.G TfoFFXvuMOSMo3L1746UjLAtljWp4oY6Eff4mcDQkl0HZxSpFDDut1nhYaVF RprnZNc4RcRTIP9Irb61Sq8NMuvBV7_qVNaK5z6avJgRJXtfJOHEmSUbJ7uR jNoha0jDcMkRplmKDXlnAPEYttHp5RLug.G_GGYOb_ohEEZLWUDDFsuwC.JD FRp6VuDofSh9.jhPtYMRT5vD4Dg0CJGgwj7knsgChHAwU0Hajdo6npxVWkKk VlGuDcXXkcf911e8A2FsV2.rB06lGd_ayZhdQH7r70Qa_VrxZWVRjQJQJBUk zDGQD Received: from [151.99.187.181] by web111912.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:54:01 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/570 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.304355 References: <15528.29cd1840.3b267cd9@aol.com> <4DF52F44.80500@talktalk.net> <4DF53655.40001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8024ACF0F5734035BFE8E7BBDDF47EA8@a8b21ba06852476> <002f01cc29f2$be0a1ce0$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <2F6C8B8017984C2A8563736DA67284AA@PC2> <4DF6843A.5080908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4DF73576.4070405@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <11891ECF261E4CD8AFD5EDD8F68DF13F@a8b21ba06852476> <4DF8A36C.9020404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:54:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniele Tincani To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4DF8A36C.9020404@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF in Spain Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1343312524-1308146041=:48029" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:502085952:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d025.2 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039400c89a64df8b9de5ce7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-1343312524-1308146041=:48029 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan,=0Ain fact I tried to compare a small and simple-to-build active loo= p for VLF =0Areception (ref. http://www.vlf.it/easyloop/_easyloop.htm) with= a short E-probe =0Abased on your design and with another short active whip= based on Steve =0AMcGreevy's BBB-4. Unfortunately, noise conditions at my = location (in Livorno, =0AItaly) are so bad that it was very hard to get acc= eptable results under 10KHz. =0AAdditionally, I didn't perform specific tes= ts with the E-probes, like for =0Aexample attaching them to a fishing rod (= or other support) to put them well =0Aoutside of my balcony at 5th floor, t= hat probably would have given a substantial =0Aimprovement. Anyway, I think= I have some test results and screenshots stored on =0Amy hard disk and I w= ill be pleased to share them with Jose. I will be sending a =0Amore informa= tive message (hopefully) on the reflector when back to home this =0Aevening= .=0ANow I have a new soundcard (the popular E-MU 0202) and a new portable P= C, so =0Athere could be room for repeating my tests=A0in autumn.=0ABest reg= ards=0ADaniele=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Stefa= n Sch=E4fer =0ATo: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep= .org=0ASent: Wed, June 15, 2011 2:19:56 PM=0ASubject: Re: LF: Re: VLF in Sp= ain=0A=0AHello Jos=E9,=0A=0AOK, but if you live in a city, brobably it is b= etter to try a small E field =0Aantenna first. Daniele Tinacani has done ma= ny tests with loops and E field =0Aantennas on 9 kHz. Maybe he can give som= e further advice (if he reads this =0Amail). =0A=0AIt would be worth to mon= itor a wideband screen to see which kind of noise =0Aaffects the RX. Some E= MC tricks may improve things easily by 20 dB, depending on =0Athe source an= d path of the noise. You can find these by testing, e.g. trying a =0Abatter= y instead of a normal power supply, trying a battery fed notebook instead = =0Aof a normal PC, trying to ground (or not) the antenna either on the RX o= r =0Aantenna side, using an audio transformer to decouple an earth loop, ri= sing the =0Aantenna by 2m (to reduce the gain and improve the wanted signal= strength) and =0Aand and :-)=0AI remember these works and email exchanges = by 4X1RF, TF3HZ, G3ZJO and others. =0AAll they have gained a lot after seei= ng and experimenting where the noise comes =0Afrom. So the wideband screen = is essential i mean...=0A=0A73, GL, =0A=0AStefan/DK7FC=0A=0AAm 14.06.2011 2= 3:28, schrieb jos=E9 manuel: =0AHello Stefan,=0A>=0A>My idea is to=A0use=A0= the PC as VLF RX under 10 kHz. I think that the level noise =0A>increased i= n my urban environment because I don=B4t copy=A0 the Alpha=B4s =0A>transmis= sions now, however I could copy them=A0some years ago,=A0when I worked on = =0A>137 kHz. I=B4ll try=A0to improve my provisional antenna system, perhaps= with a loop =0A>I can reject some of the "made man noise" :-) I=B4ll tell = you about the =0A>experiences.=0A>=0A>73 de Jos=E9, EA1PX=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>--= --- Original Message ----- =0A>>From: Stefan Sch=E4fer =0A>>To: rsgb_lf_gro= up@blacksheep.org =0A>>Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 12:18 PM=0A>>Subject: L= F: VLF in Spain=0A>>=0A>>Hello Jos=E9,=0A>>=0A>>OK. Do you already have a r= eceiver for VLF? If so, which one? The PC's =0A>>soundcard? Or do you just = guess that you have strong QRM? =0A>>=0A>>Many stations are in the city, li= ke 4X1RF, SQ5BPF and me. Anyway there is good =0A>>reception, 4X1RF even at= above 2500 km! Others are in the countryside and have =0A>>never really go= t good reception, so mostly its an EMC issue. =0A>>=0A>>Thus i would sugges= t to built a suitable antenna and run a suitable software and =0A>>monitor = the total spectrum of your soundcard input which is mostly 0...24 kHz, =0A>= >often called "wideband". You can see these windows running on many grabber= s such =0A>>as =0A>>=0A>>http://www.mydarc.de/df6nm/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm=0A>>= http://www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber/=0A>>http://qsl.net/4x1rf/yo/vlfgrabber.htm= =0A>>http://simnet.is/halldorgudmunds/TF3HZ_VLFgrabber/index.html=0A>>http:= //www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html and many = =0A>>others.=0A>>Then, you'll get immediately an impression of the actual s= ituation and see =0A>>effects like mains hum, sferics and the Alphas system= and some MSKs.=0A>>Seeing the Alphas and the sferics (i.e. the gap arround= 8...11 UTC) is a first =0A>>good indicator for sensitivity!=0A>>=0A>>Actua= lly all you need is a few Euros to build that RX antenna which can be a =0A= >>loop or a E field antenna. Mosty receptions were done with the E field an= tennas =0A>>which have some advantages due to their low weight and volume. = But loop antennas =0A>>have shown very good results as well, mostly in quie= t locations (like Paul =0A>>Nicholson, F4DTL, M0BMU...).=0A>>=0A>>73, Stefa= n/DK7FC=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>Am 14.06.2011 00:08, schrieb Jose Manuel: =0A>>S= tefan,=0A>>>=0A>>>I=B4ll try to do some experience on sub 9kHz reception; I= =B4ll try to find a quiet =0A>>>location on holiday, because I live in a ve= ry noisy urban environment.=0A>>>=0A>>>Regarding 137 kHz I had some 2-way Q= SO=B4s in the past with your country, with =0A>>>Wolf, Markus and others, b= ut currently my LF antenna is down and I need to =0A>>>repair the SLM as we= ll.=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>73 de Jos=E9, EA1PX=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>=0A>>>-----= Original Message ----- =0A>>>>From: Stefan Sch=E4fer =0A>>>>To: rsgb_lf_gr= oup@blacksheep.org =0A>>>>Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 11:42 PM=0A>>>>Subjec= t: Re: LF: ZEVS tonight.jpg=0A>>>>=0A>>>>Jos=E8, =0A>>>>=0A>>>>You can get = many informations about the Dreamers Band (<9) at G3XBMs sub 9 kHz =0A>>>>w= ebsite: https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/=0A>>>>Here you find record l= ists and advice for antennas. And you can get every =0A>>>>information need= ed HERE! :-)=0A>>>>=0A>>>>73, Stefan/DK7FC=0A>>>>=0A>>>>Am 13.06.2011 23:30= , schrieb Jose Manuel: =0A>>>>Mal and all,=0A>>>>>=0A>>>>>You know that rec= eption on 9 kHz is much more difficult than on 137 kHz.=0A>>>>>I never trie= d to receive below 10 kHz, perhaps in a couple of weeks, when I=B4m on =0A>= >>>>holiday ;-)=0A>>>>>=0A>>>>>73, Jos=E9, EA1PX=0A>>>>>=0A>>>>>=0A>>>>>---= -- Original Message ----- =0A>>>>>>From: mal hamilton =0A>>>>>>To: rsgb_lf_= group@blacksheep.org =0A>>>>>>Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 7:53 PM=0A>>>>>>S= ubject: Re: LF: ZEVS tonight.jpg=0A>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>Jose=0A>>>>>>In = the past you were able to copy me on CW no problem, with XBAND qso=0A>>>>>>= de mal/g3kev=0A>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- =0A>>>>= >>>From: jos=E9 manuel =0A>>>>>>>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>>>>>>= >Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 4:14 PM=0A>>>>>>>Subject: Re: LF: ZEVS tonight= .jpg=0A>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>Hi Stefan and all,=0A>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>I= =B4m in the NW of Spain, locator IN53ti, but with a very long path with you= =0A>>>>;-)=0A>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>73 de Jos=E9, EA1PX=0A>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>=0A>>= >>>>>=0A>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- =0A>>>>>>>>From: Stef= an Sch=E4fer =0A>>>>>>>>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>>>>>>>>Sent: S= unday, June 12, 2011 11:57 PM=0A>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: LF: ZEVS tonight.jpg= =0A>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>>Eddie, =0A>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>>Where in France will you= be? http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/ :-)=0A>>>>>>>>Will you be RX QRV on LF/V= LF? If you are in the south, this would be an =0A>>>>>>>>interesting region= . Unfortunately there is nothing yet from Spain on VLF...=0A>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>= >>>>QRN will be high i assume so maybe it wouldn't be easy. Anyway iz would= be worth =0A>>>>>>>>a try. BTW i just checked for wind and the next weeken= d looks promising so far. =0A>>>>>>>>If it will hold on, i'll try a kite VL= F experiment but still much can change =0A>>>>>>>>until then...=0A>>>>>>>>= =0A>>>>>>>>73, Stefan/DK7FC=0A>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>>Am 1= 2.06.2011 23:27, schrieb qrss: =0A>>>>>>>>Hello Nicolas=0A>>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>= >>>>Yes almost 100% transmissions at 0800 and 1700UTC.=0A>>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>= >>>Each data element is 4min=A0 and there are 6 of those plus 'start' and '= space' =0A>>>>>>>>>makes 8 total, 32 minutes then the final long carrier 's= top' is 1 Hour.=0A>>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>>>Good luck with the antenna, yes urba= n noise is the big problem. Soon I will come =0A>>>>>>>>>to France to try s= ome really quiet places, I look forward to that.=0A>>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>>>73 = Eddie G3ZJO=0A>>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>>>On 12/06/2011 21:34, F4DTL@aol.com wrote= : =0A>>>>>>>>>Henny, Eddy beautifull captures.=0A>>>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>>>>It'= s every day at the same hour ? 0800 and 1700 UTC ?=0A>>>>>>>>>>How long the= ZVES transmissions ?=0A>>>>>>>>>>I built an new VLF antenna and I'll start= soon receptions.I would be=A0in campaign =0A>>>>>>>>>>to reduce urban nois= e.=0A>>>>>>>>>>=0A>>>>>>>>>>F4DTL Nicolas JN18FP=0A>>>>>>>>>>http://lfistes= .erst.azerttyu.net/=0A>>>>>>>> --0-1343312524-1308146041=:48029 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan,
=0A
in fact I tried to compare a small and simpl= e-to-build active loop for VLF reception (ref. http://www.vlf.it/easyloop/_easyloop.htm) with= a short E-probe based on your design and with another short active whip ba= sed on Steve McGreevy's BBB-4. Unfortunately, noise conditions at my locati= on (in Livorno, Italy) are so bad that it was very hard to get acceptable r= esults under 10KHz. Additionally, I didn't perform specific tests with the = E-probes, like for example attaching them to a fishing rod (or other suppor= t) to put them well outside of my balcony at 5th floor, that probably would= have given a substantial improvement. Anyway, I think I have some test res= ults and screenshots stored on my hard disk and I will be pleased to share = them with Jose. I will be sending a more informative message (hopefully) on= the reflector when back to home this evening.
=0A
Now I have a ne= w soundcard (the popular E-MU 0202) and a new portable PC, so there could b= e room for repeating my tests in autumn.
=0A
Best regards=0A
Daniele
=0A

=0A
= =0A
=0AFrom: St= efan Sch=E4fer <schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 2:19:56 PM<= BR>Subject: Re: LF: Re: VLF= in Spain

Hello Jos=E9,

OK, but if you live in a city,= brobably it is better to try a small E field antenna first. Daniele Tinaca= ni has done many tests with loops and E field antennas on 9 kHz. Maybe he c= an give some further advice (if he reads this mail).
It would be worth = to monitor a wideband screen to see which kind of noise affects the RX. Som= e EMC tricks may improve things easily by 20 dB, depending on the source an= d path of the noise. You can find these by testing, e.g. trying a battery i= nstead of a normal power supply, trying a battery fed notebook instead of a= normal PC, trying to ground (or not) the antenna either on the RX or antenna side, using an aud= io transformer to decouple an earth loop, rising the antenna by 2m (to redu= ce the gain and improve the wanted signal strength) and and and :-)
I re= member these works and email exchanges by 4X1RF, TF3HZ, G3ZJO and others. A= ll they have gained a lot after seeing and experimenting where the noise co= mes from. So the wideband screen is essential i mean...

73, GL,
=
Stefan/DK7FC

Am 14.06.2011 23:28, schrieb jos=E9 manuel: =0A=0A
Hello Stefan,
=0A
 
=0A
My idea is= to use the PC as VLF RX under 10 kHz. I think that the level noi= se increased in my urban environment because I don=B4t copy  the Alpha= =B4s transmissions now, however I could copy them some years ago, = ;when I worked on 137 kHz. I=B4ll try to improve my provisional antenn= a system, perhaps with a loop I can reject some of the "made man noise" :-)= I=B4ll tell you about the experiences.
=0A
 
=0A=
73 de Jos=E9, EA1PX
=0A
&n= bsp;
=0A
 
=0A
 
=0A
=0A
----- Original Message -= ----
=0A=0A=0A
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 12:18 = PM
=0A
Subject: LF: VLF in Spain
=0A

Hello= Jos=E9,

OK. Do you already have a receiver for VLF? If so, which on= e? The PC's soundcard? Or do you just guess that you have strong QRM?
M= any stations are in the city, like 4X1RF, SQ5BPF and me. Anyway there is go= od reception, 4X1RF even at above 2500 km! Others are in the countryside an= d have never really got good reception, so mostly its an EMC issue.
Thu= s i would suggest to built a suitable antenna and run a suitable software a= nd monitor the total spectrum of your soundcard input which is mostly 0...2= 4 kHz, often called "wideband". You can see these windows running on many g= rabbers such as
http://www.mydarc.de/df6nm/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm
http:/= /www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber/
http://qsl.net/4x1rf/yo/vlfgrabber.htm
htt= p://simnet.is/halldorgudmunds/TF3HZ_VLFgrabber/index.html
http://www.iup= .uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html and many others.
= Then, you'll get immediately an impression of the actual situation and see effects like mains hum, sferics and the Alphas sy= stem and some MSKs.
Seeing the Alphas and the sferics (i.e. the gap arro= und 8...11 UTC) is a first good indicator for sensitivity!

Actually = all you need is a few Euros to build that RX antenna which can be a loop or= a E field antenna. Mosty receptions were done with the E field antennas wh= ich have some advantages due to their low weight and volume. But loop anten= nas have shown very good results as well, mostly in quiet locations (like P= aul Nicholson, F4DTL, M0BMU...).

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am = 14.06.2011 00:08, schrieb Jose Manuel: =0A
=0AStefan,
=0A
 
=0AI=B4ll try to do some experience on sub 9kHz = reception; I=B4ll try to find a quiet location on holiday, because I live i= n a very noisy urban environment.
=0A
 
=0A
<= FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Regarding 137 kHz I had some 2-way QSO=B4s in th= e past with your country, with Wolf, Markus and others, but currently my LF= antenna is down and I need to repair the SLM as well.
=0A
=  
=0A
 
=0A
73 de J= os=E9, EA1PX
=0A
 
=0A
 
=0A
&n= bsp;
=0A
 
=0A
=0A
----- Original Message -----
=0A=0A=0A
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 11:42 PM
=0A
Su= bject: Re: LF: ZEVS tonight.jpg
=0A

Jos=E8,

= You can get many informations about the Dreamers Band (<9) at G3XBMs sub= 9 kHz website:
https://sites.google.c= om/site/sub9khz/
Here you find record lists and advice for antennas.= And you can get every information needed HERE! :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC=

Am 13.06.2011 23:30, schrieb Jose Manuel: =0A
=0A=0A=0A
Mal and all,
=0A
 
=0A
You know= that reception on 9 kHz is much more difficult than on 137 kHz.=0A
I never tried to receive below 10 kHz= , perhaps in a couple of weeks, when I=B4m on holiday ;-)
=0A 
=0A
73, Jos=E9, EA1PX=
=0A
 
=0A
 
=0A
=0A
----- Original Message -----=
=0A=0A= =0A
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 7:53 PM
=0A
Subject: Re: LF:= ZEVS tonight.jpg
=0A

=0A
Jose
=0A
In the past you were= able to copy me on CW no problem, with XBAND qso
=0A
de mal/g3kev
=0A
 
=0A 
=0A
=0A
----- Original Message -----
=0A=0A=0A
Sent: Monday, June 13= , 2011 4:14 PM
=0A
Subject: Re: LF: ZEVS tonight.jpg
=0A=

=0A
Hi Stefan and all,
=0A
 
=0A
I=B4m in the= NW of Spain, locator IN53ti, but with a very long path with you ;-)=
=0A
 
=0A
73 de Jos=E9,= EA1PX
=0A
 
=0A
 
=0A
 =0A
 
=0A
=0A
----- Original Message -----
=0A=0A
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <= /DIV>=0A
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 11:57 PM
=0A
Subj= ect: Re: LF: ZEVS tonight.jpg
=0A

Eddie,

Whe= re in France will you be? http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/ :-)
Will you be = RX QRV on LF/VLF? If you are in the south, this would be an interesting reg= ion. Unfortunately there is nothing yet from Spain on VLF...

QRN wil= l be high i assume so maybe it wouldn't be easy. Anyway iz would be worth a= try. BTW i just checked for wind and the next weekend looks promising so f= ar. If it will hold on, i'll try a kite VLF experiment but still much can c= hange until then...

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am 12.06.2011 23= :27, schrieb qrss: =0A
Hello Nicolas

Yes al= most 100% transmissions at 0800 and 1700UTC.

Each data element is 4m= in  and there are 6 of those plus 'start' and 'space' makes 8 total, 3= 2 minutes then the final long carrier 'stop' is 1 Hour.

Good luck wi= th the antenna, yes urban noise is the big problem. Soon I will come to Fra= nce to try some really quiet places, I look forward to that.

73 Eddi= e G3ZJO

On 12/06/2011 21:34, F4DTL@aol.com wrote: =0A
=0A
Henny, Ed= dy beautifull captures.
=0A
 
=0A
It's every day at = the same hour ? 0800 and 1700 UTC ?
=0A
How long the ZVES transmis= sions ?
=0A
I built an new VLF antenna and I'll start soon recepti= ons.I would be in campaign to reduce urban noise.
=0A
 <= /DIV>=0A
F4DTL Nico= las JN18FP
http://lfistes.erst.azerttyu.net/

--0-1343312524-1308146041=:48029--