Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w0RGJ4Ic012725 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 17:19:06 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1efT6s-0004pv-ST for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 16:13:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1efT6W-0004pm-Qn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 16:13:20 +0000 Received: from mail-wr0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22d]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1efT6S-0003e4-Lg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 16:13:19 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id t16so2964324wrc.10 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 08:13:16 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QS2RQCaTdTF/cxg3ens7gkLqJXkh35sXh0GuO8QiwWs=; b=Tv+2ZkUuA7nr7CrsgBEI2PNsQud5Lc9JWreAeQql3cgXzh/xJ0urlvBoHY8bmhrvsz lI+VDeVA2YXNpNHzB8BLQuXoEg7Hn6D7iKH8eRRupS6dsxNvdYobtY3MI58vg6+LJUjW FzQZBZGX5a2WrU6JTuxywF9rgQyZJjMVJgnpMQmok9rASndwoAUCTN1Og5EMMOC8WraP WUlMbAT0KGvJ0c0BuLFWc8tGgb38pQcw3e7uCzP5BujS07JQdIZ31tGwQ45g3iJU3/s2 x+r2uGyVgLAiylXELQSGz3Bta6uD4kBm/Yzr/MkcIueN3sNbx8WeIddngXhQVTb7Q32G nsSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QS2RQCaTdTF/cxg3ens7gkLqJXkh35sXh0GuO8QiwWs=; b=jzYRn+c5nV/j0Ou4GL/ggHJmHvQv/K6NN9k1Pe/EKRar4PpMoQk+10JX/vncjPugwZ B+nRlurkw9zR5tyfdYgEbtMRKEBABOpl5eDB1WahUk6aBETXq6OSwAW+guH+/zNPRjT+ u5px0ERSIry1Ee8eytsyfksgVN7vDQzGGfXUy8T4Jj6U1SG/3SqnFHVeDqR6JHppAGTO XJ1q4TJYP1/rylIQuiDT3krCzTFJIGtYmCEK/U7PJ1Rz10I0Ocgkzl+zrmoS++zi64fy YOBSIYMF4VMTOHVoUJYnk3c3h3GoRHU5bdsYWo3It41r31i8ILKlwSx7cx3MgsA7695s glSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfjxuJ5HLiSWzBHAe4P9vfejGcwjYXNg0hKacNelX4mcxcZkVIE cZfvidasHRlIwNXhW2OhNQwQAg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227puNClB0fBqvYSkPFI81sHkHwzoKMImbwz6irR56hp0VQQBc2aE46i1T0EZzUgS9rd5i2rMQ== X-Received: by 10.223.145.129 with SMTP id 1mr1450959wri.18.1517069595026; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 08:13:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z74sm6604278wmz.21.2018.01.27.08.13.13 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Jan 2018 08:13:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 16:13:12 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <7010021367.20180127161312@gmail.com> To: M0FMT CC: dead.fets@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <1371247928.20180126134524@gmail.com> <1397698645.2553258.1516983835152.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe7.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> <686847880.20180126193617@gmail.com> <791320206.20180126221646@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello all. Today when powered up there was rarely any output from the divider at all, so I started again. I decided to try two things, build a little test rig with a spare xtal of the same 461.5kHz as the one in the RX with the same C10 at 3900pF and C11 at 2700pF on a bit of pcb and excite it at 1v P to P sine wave from my sig gen around the xtal frequency and look at the output on the scope. That failed abysmally, no change in display, thinking about it maybe it's due to the big capacitances involved? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 118b9e608370528226a3c3b3aedcdda0 Subject: Re: LF: Softrock RX divider IC problem, unexpected frequency out Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id w0RGJ4Ic012725 Hello all. Today when powered up there was rarely any output from the divider at all, so I started again. I decided to try two things, build a little test rig with a spare xtal of the same 461.5kHz as the one in the RX with the same C10 at 3900pF and C11 at 2700pF on a bit of pcb and excite it at 1v P to P sine wave from my sig gen around the xtal frequency and look at the output on the scope. That failed abysmally, no change in display, thinking about it maybe it's due to the big capacitances involved? Anyway, back to the RX. C12 at 680pF, C10 at 3900pF and C11 at 2700pF. Waveforms taken with scope at DC coupling, but V scaling changes. I believe (dangerous with my lack of knowledge..) that C10 to base of Q1 is good. Base of Q2 looks ok. But with R16 at the recommended 10K I see half a sine wave at the emitter of Q2. With the original 20k (I don't have the oddball 20.1k around) the waveform is still part complete and of a much lower amplitude. Is this a bias issue with Q2 or something else please? I hope the file names are self explanatory! Note that V axis scaling changes in some shots!! Thank you for all your help! The schematic for the modded Softrock Lite II in question: http://www.gatesgarth.com/schematic2.jpg Scope screen captures: http://www.gatesgarth.com/lf-base-q1.jpg http://www.gatesgarth.com/lf-emitter-q1.jpg http://www.gatesgarth.com/lf-base-q2.jpg http://www.gatesgarth.com/lf-emitter-q2-r16-at-10k.jpg http://www.gatesgarth.com/lf-emitter-q2-r16-at-22k.jpg Friday, January 26, 2018, 11:52:20 PM, you wrote: > Hi again > Well all seems well if you are getting a good wave at the flip flop > output. Just a comment about your input wave forms yes the MF does > show a second harmonic petty low and as you have said the MF version > works OK. Please remember a square wave is in fact and infinite > number of harmonic frequencies so this is not an issue the dominant > wave is overwhelmingly the fundamental so that will be processed > into a square wave by the Flip Flop.  If the drive to the > multiplexer is good as you say (I can not open the JPG but it > doesn't matter) it sounds like the local oscillator divider chain is > correct. I can only conclude the instability reported is at the > oscillator suggest you concentrate on that as a source of your > problem. ..... I have run out of ideas. > Anyway good luck and please report the solution there are a lot of > people very interested. 73 petefmt -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com