Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9045 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2001 17:13:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 19 Feb 2001 17:13:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 9405 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2001 17:13:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 19 Feb 2001 17:13:24 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14Uti5-0007if-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:02:49 +0000 Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.37]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14Uti1-0007iW-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:02:46 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id l.70.7fbc5cf (3971) for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:01:55 -0500 (EST) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: <70.7fbc5cf.27c2ab83@aol.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:01:55 EST Subject: Re: LF: Slower and slower To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: << There's nothing to stop you integrating a signal over days, except that the frequency stability and accuracy required (not the same thing) gets tighter and tighter. >> And, as Alberto pointed out, the propagation path gets in the way of this kind of stability too. John