Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 98038380000A1;
Thu, 24 May 2012 19:34:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1SXhXE-00014J-6R
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:33:36 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1SXhXD-00014A-Mr
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:33:35 +0100
Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62] helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com)
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <radiodog77@pobox.com>)
id 1SXhXB-0003Ad-Ik
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:33:34 +0100
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2386C9929
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:33:30 -0400 (EDT)
X-DKIM-Result: Domain=pobox.com Result=Signature OK
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=message-id
:date:to:from:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
:content-type; s=sasl; bh=vRMO7mrsvTXrpknD9yUjLhdr5CI=; b=Shm1Zb
QcU2bZVAQnpbHWD9rob+f4z5EhnvE8MGsebJUBJIElBF3WglG+N0bELinEvgagmI
L4W5FSftyE4rI7mEEvAEdCZfWO5wbAqAhTMD/+dgLYp5oy5LzOwe6WgE80cw/8ZA
8GZWrHVyal0w9EYyuQpDXfV73HMLvtXYnQVZ4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=message-id:date
:to:from:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qkn03JS2TeC8ZUYQLxCwZMdsZ+SarcK6
2kuIvTeuQzfMWUGypcvqbR4x6MYIJN+WDfMVc7W682rEUi04adw1LheI8KGoJIeG
lP5BHwsx5E3SFzW6kQtBUSK7vHbNBZnhPXm1tT0LSQfvoGtbJBWQo9OJITPWDiDi
aaz5ndui4pI=
Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A19D9928
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:33:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fast-one.pobox.com (unknown [71.163.225.192]) by
a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BFB139927 for
<rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:33:27 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20120524192418.03a9a868@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 19:33:12 -0400
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: Nan and Sandy Sanders <radiodog77@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPTN-fxZoT=LZYbx7mt9pi0tPZQXE8nYX0Q0HwLc+obXczOi7g@mail.g
mail.com>
References:
<CAHAQVWPELGnAZKqF3T7AaYo7pgd4GCTZO-L5iTCU3p3vYM+AEw@mail.gmail.com>
<4FBE62F1.9020203@psk31.plus.com> <4FBE6D2A.6000907@usa.net>
<CAPTN-fxZoT=LZYbx7mt9pi0tPZQXE8nYX0Q0HwLc+obXczOi7g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Pobox-Relay-ID:
DD2547FC-A5F8-11E1-9D22-E981AF15ED39-16367692!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Another lurker here, one of the AMRAD LF crew. I have been
on this list several years but only post every 2 or 3 years. Just trying
to keep up with LF. Sandy WB5MMB At 06:16 PM 5/24/2012, you wrote: >On Thu,
May 24, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alberto di Bene <dibene@usa.net> wrote: > > Another
suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning that each > > request
for membership should be > > accompanied by a very short introductory message
explaining why that > > membership is requested. > > Then the moderator(s)
of the group will decide whether to accept it or not. > > I suppose the same
is done > > presently with the Majordomo mailer. > > > > And, if that introductory
message is convincing, but up to a point... then > > the moderator can accept
the individual, > > but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every
message from him > > must be examined by the moderator(s) > > before being
published. The moderation status can be removed > after a couple > > of legitimate
messages from the guy, > > showing that he is not a troll or spammer. > >I
see where you're coming from, but there's probably more than me on >here
who are just lurkers, and we'd be excluded because we don't post. >I've been
signed up to the list for months (nearly a year?) purely >because I'm interested
in LF. I don't have the equipment or the space >for LF operation but I've
followed the achievements that have been >made between some of the members
on this list and it always makes for >interesting reading. > >Running a mailing
list isn't difficult, but Yahoo groups is probably >the best way to go. Those
who want to get the messages by e-mail >notice no difference, and there's
the occasionally useful extras if >needed. > >My 2p worth! > >Andy >M0VKG
> >-- >Andy Smith >+44 7848 958821 : http://m0vkg.org.uk/ : http://andys.org.uk/
[...]
Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[74.115.168.62 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18
Subject: Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:462673664:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m021.2 ; domain : pobox.com DKIM : pass
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d4fbec58a255d
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror
Another lurker here, one of the AMRAD LF crew. I have been on this
list several years but only post every 2 or 3 years. Just trying to
keep up with LF.
Sandy
WB5MMB
At 06:16 PM 5/24/2012, you wrote:
>On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alberto di Bene <dibene@usa.net> wrote:
> > Another suggestion is to not make it an open group, meaning that each
> > request for membership should be
> > accompanied by a very short introductory message explaining why that
> > membership is requested.
> > Then the moderator(s) of the group will decide whether to accept it or not.
> > I suppose the same is done
> > presently with the Majordomo mailer.
> >
> > And, if that introductory message is convincing, but up to a point... then
> > the moderator can accept the individual,
> > but putting him in moderation status, meaning that every message from him
> > must be examined by the moderator(s)
> > before being published. The moderation status can be removed
> after a couple
> > of legitimate messages from the guy,
> > showing that he is not a troll or spammer.
>
>I see where you're coming from, but there's probably more than me on
>here who are just lurkers, and we'd be excluded because we don't post.
>I've been signed up to the list for months (nearly a year?) purely
>because I'm interested in LF. I don't have the equipment or the space
>for LF operation but I've followed the achievements that have been
>made between some of the members on this list and it always makes for
>interesting reading.
>
>Running a mailing list isn't difficult, but Yahoo groups is probably
>the best way to go. Those who want to get the messages by e-mail
>notice no difference, and there's the occasionally useful extras if
>needed.
>
>My 2p worth!
>
>Andy
>M0VKG
>
>--
>Andy Smith
>+44 7848 958821 : http://m0vkg.org.uk/ : http://andys.org.uk/