Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Received: (qmail 14121 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2000 19:31:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Dec 2000 19:31:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 21033 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2000 19:33:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 13 Dec 2000 19:33:23 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 146HYh-0003AC-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:27:23 +0000 Received: from imo-r19.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.73] helo=imo-r19.mail.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 146HYg-0003A7-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 19:27:22 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from DL4YHF@aol.com by imo-r19.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.34.) id l.6f.e593faa (4008) for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:26:33 -0500 (EST) From: DL4YHF@aol.com Message-ID: <6f.e593faa.27692768@aol.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:26:32 EST Subject: LF: Re: PSK sidebands with "slow phase changes" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 69 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Hello Andy, Steward and others, I also think that modifying the PSK generator with a 'slow phase change' as suggested by Steward (KK7KA) is a very good idea so we don't need linear transmitters / transverters for this task. I will try to program a kind of "test generator" (no real PSK modulator) to see what the spectrum looks like. Or has someone done this before so we don't have to invent the wheel twice ? 73's Wolf (DL4YHF)