Return-Path: Received: from mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.215]) by air-dd09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD094-86b14cd808451ba; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 09:25:10 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D887538000085; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:25:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PFScm-0004DD-Ud for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:23:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PFScm-0004D4-HI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:23:08 +0000 Received: from smtp815.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.20]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PFSck-0005H3-78 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:23:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 58342 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 14:23:00 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=kFrlnyXGhJiU/cpqJ0lMcdKs3XOY80AhAJYOxMCkNvRetx9ovrVmLYxDnofLc5jFt9z/m69mbZXc+PhW+RKvvt4Vd18zoH8aNnX0fKfEBhN/dL7f7SO1k1Jv+qsEAxLfA3yhibjIvP1OwscpYPwTPv2+TNKMHT1W8b1xpWQwO70= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1289226180; bh=tVAWAdQJc11k+voZtGsf2fxjlJHbTrM1qfy1lO1eRXY=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=DWq6aGjXkaPNaW0QLoruEQ7IvCG3+IT1ZV6XL4NItPMyDu+YB6ToxiVD+aFeTvy6ZvpNuySlSXJ81U1xzwIleOIZ3TIezqZ1A8V0+SxfTUqua7zHEW/qEQwctnkSDuf8RHjJPF7Xq7FVpb9NIhdNkO9RJmljZUjxTcnOydDmXhg= Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@86.179.210.103 with login) by smtp815.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 08 Nov 2010 14:23:00 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- X-YMail-OSG: idBr0D8VM1mqfF5Jo0fRMDPcK60pEvLOuIz8LuvJYESdZdL z4y5d6lFMQZ1SEgfPDM34GfWTDk7bQw3b7wvLym87nhNmA8qELchFVBglWKp YMa5yXNzsmMYvlYa2w0fpCbVOtJEp2rqvk5vLosREZIkZHq.DErYY8lOkYl3 cFkWiGQ7qOCfS5EextlJx7uQf9uPmcj4yrSIJz9gwh5XCxYzd5RwyvlX.Nyg KEh4f0bD5wjoNtX3EzMU- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <6EEAA299A2084FACB780B4F9A675C31C@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <798586.46009.qm@web111901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <798586.46009.qm@web111901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:22:59 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: BBB-4-like receiver ready for first tests Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m237.2 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d74cd808437966 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear Daniele, LF Group, You wrote: ...>The spectrum taken at the Agilent output appeared to be pretty flat at -114dB on SpecLab from DC to about 22KHz The info missing from your test is what noise output level the Agilent AWG is set to - I imagine this would be volts RMS over some noise bandwidth. The -114dB level you quote is very low, and possibly just due to the internal noise of the sound card itself (my PC shows a level of about -118dB). Does the noise floor fall when the sound card input is disconnected from the generator? If the generator level is very low, this would account for there being little change in output level with the generator disconnected. Try increasing the generator output level - does the output from the circuit increase by the same amount? If you want to check the circuit gain, it would probably be better to use a sine wave input signal. ...>The resulting signal at the output of the receiver looked in good accordance with the response curve I had obtained from circuit simulation in LTSpice. Yes, that looks reasonable - so the circuit is probably mostly working, although without positively measuring the gain, it is still possible there is some fault around the input. I would expect an overall voltage gain roughly around 60dB. ...>Q1: could such a response curve be suitable for reception of sub-9KHz transmissions in the dreamers band or for chasing whistlers only? The filter rolls the gain off rapidly below about 1kHz and above about 10kHz. So this would be OK for whistlers and 9kHz reception, but would attenuate VLF utilities at higher frequencies. This could be a problem if you wanted to use a VLF utility for frequency-locking purposes. Reducing L1 to 22mH increases the upper cut-off frequency to over 20kHz - it also increases the in-band gain slightly too. C3, R4 and D1, D2 also will reduce the gain at higher frequencies, so you may wish to reduce R4. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU