Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x55LF7P4001260 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 23:15:08 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hYd1n-0008PU-4V for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 22:00:59 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hYczQ-0008PG-Hy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 21:58:32 +0100 Received: from out2-22.antispamcloud.com ([185.201.17.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hYczJ-0006A6-H8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 21:58:28 +0100 Received: from [85.60.35.36] (helo=servigilant.vigilant.es) by mx148.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hYczD-000trl-3M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 22:58:22 +0200 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448]) by servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 22:58:14 +0200 From: =?Windows-1252?Q?VIGILANT_Luis_Fern=E1ndez?= To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: Re: EbNaut considerations for tomorrow... Thread-Index: AQHVGILh1CHiRmVdOUO3rVR+giePgaaIyujigAFwZYCAAPKDkIABSBWAgAEWkdU= Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 20:58:13 +0000 Message-ID: <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEBAD4F@servigilant.vigilant.local> References: <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA31596319@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<5CF283CC.9010701@posteo.de> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB7DAC@servigilant.vigilant.local> <5CF57C41.7020008@posteo.de> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEB9071@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<5CF75AE7.8080103@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5CF75AE7.8080103@posteo.de> Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [85.55.48.44] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 85.60.35.36 X-MailAssure-Domain: vigilant.es X-MailAssure-Username: smtpsolarwinds Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=smtpsolarwinds@vigilant.es X-MailAssure-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-MailAssure-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.43) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0WF37iHSchYgKnNGmAxHYR+pSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVbCUpsbSFZ4Mz JQKkJIJ520TNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKywOmJyM1qr8uRnWBrbSAGDJiPq8PmJuu7YOC8gdYyWscQz 4E/a7yDKGr49b/XGOm3nx8yeplRO3sLIqUlSH7OGw+g2h5xO4TUJCFMWombLo5OIWFXUh+IpRF9t B9BlKGiqF9ybpkhHmrxfD8EI7+syPM2DmctUkuqITdPZ8a3LudN/iuybv6sUYbxwwE+S8ketUL/7 I1A1y3ZusNYDb9Xr24o+Vv8i2z8nxEvhj+eMUYS1NmIuUeHtjbMGUlbwYp7yECL9mks5JA2WmV0j OQ2IRewdg89se8z6H0v0PT5/1AMhs6Vd/27IRcfPy6aCMyGlLE/ThVKYyBYw3bkIielYTN4iETsS vWr7oTdyZy4Etw5L6jqgSfWla2VKGKVqyxJ6E88rdNCCqLzbeGniXrNUbCXuYoR/PhqzJGU18gjb TB7lAnB94HxoyuzObyBmweApOMQJvQ/Ck3iiU+4DQAj3X9tlc742Vbpr3XVspeKJGAJP758ckBxk i8TFimWdolk0iLjohvzdmOZLYoPQj2XLzumxloh80B95me5BjQZ8TweYUOp7A73HI6oJg7w/VodX p4E1ZYFJ9YuYfszsL+9C+rqyfkKyO4Exa2qiy4MeWj1jX4Hk0CX5SIpbwK5S75x9JSP/g55D2eyA 8cd2bVn7cc6BDXMbon5uP1K9pkdiSqg/Y6uxqEP3/ImCWj8DFKJyrnSvClxbMzziZ9QovUfGP183 hFW3cVeuid3BKU87wFndan3YrDjIi+vVj4LktcSKKWAfdVc2btqIxy1cHs4fv+M4wO2MDjsVUdso wuCO7g03R+dC8dVwg9EvJV/whA7wBTL1+6vDOMemz/4I88NDX/lKbl56WEA43II2O5j3KS7RAcc7 JARA7A31W2KSc//SiAdaQR/U+bqw7EJwE89r X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine3.antispamcloud.com X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, VLF >Don't expect better results from a larger antenna at the same location Not the same location. I'm using my Tx antenna in Benidorm (IM98wn). My grabber runs in Albir, another location at 7km at IM98xn Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [185.201.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [85.60.35.36 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-Scan-Signature: bb953ecadee360a40f72202c1637b86b Subject: Re: LF: Re: EbNaut considerations for tomorrow... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEBAD4Fservigilantvigi_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_000_6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEBAD4Fservigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, VLF >Don't expect better results from a larger antenna at the same location Not the same location. I'm using my Tx antenna in Benidorm (IM98wn). My gra= bber runs in Albir, another location at 7km at IM98xn Finally used a simple audio transformer to connect the vertical LF resonant= antenna to the PC audio card And results are quite interesting. This is the 24KHz VLF band in a 20 minut= es spectrogram https://www.dropbox.com/s/fsmk8lbti8ap90d/Benidorm%2090m%20vertical%20LF%20= tuned%20VLF%2024KHz%20spectrogram%2020%20minutes.JPG?dl=3D0 Comparing with Paul's VLF receiver I can see also the same stations here. T= he lower JXN and the S/N are quite aceptable. http://abelian.org/vlf/spectrum.shtml The most important is that QRM from lift motors variators is produced just = in a few frequencies, not wipping all the band. You can see the elevators activity as signals around 16KHz, 1= 5KHz, 10.5KHz and strong at 8 and around 5.5KHz During the 20min there was a sudden reduction in background noise. This is = not due to modifications in my settings, but real QRM stopped. Has to investigate why it happens I made a detailed spectrogram around 8KHz https://www.dropbox.com/s/cjnsc0mpqdec5ho/Benidorm%2090m%20vertical%20LF%20= tuned%20VLF%208270Hz%20spectrogram.JPG?dl=3D0 Fortunately the offending signals are concentrated on 7700, 8000 and 8300Hz= . So 8270 with high integration will be out of the elevators interference, which is a very good news :-) I need a signal. And connect the audio to 1pps Tonight I will be tuning the 11.904 Alpha. Seems that there is a fainth tra= ce in my grabber 73 de Luis EA5DOM ________________________________ De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]= en nombre de DK7FC [selberdenken@posteo.de] Enviado: mi=E9rcoles, 5 de junio de 2019 8:02 Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Asunto: Re: LF: Re: EbNaut considerations for tomorrow... Hi Luis, Moving the grabber to a quiter place is an =93old=94 plan. There are some o= ptions but all of them requiere dedication and negotiation. in other words =85. time! I know :-) Everything needs dedication. Using the transmitting antenna for Rx in VLF may be the quick option Don't expect better results from a larger antenna at the same location. It may be an option to build an active symmetrical antenna, as recently des= cribed by DF9RB, and lift this as high as possible out of the 'cloud' of QR= M which surrounds the building. But this is a new experimental project whic= h, again, needs time and dedication :-) And it will never give the same goo= d results as you can get from a quiet location. I would suggest to use your existing VLF RX antenna and try it out on the a= lternative location, using a notebook running SpecLab. Just for a few minut= es. Use a fast running spectrogram, 500 ms/pixel covering 0...24 kHz. And t= hen take a screen capture... I=92m looking for 11.907Hz Alpha using the 90m vertical tuned for LF. I can= get fainth traces with the MiniWhip from 06 to 10 UTC which can be seen in my grabber. Let=92s see if there is = something detected with the vertical despite the elevators QRM The Alphas are OFF since some months, except some temporary periods taking = a few hours, sometimes with reduced power or not all transmitters active. ZEVS is back with good availability since some time again but it is more ch= allenging to receive it at all. I=92m using the Perseur for that. The PC soundcard would be better at that = frequency. Must make an interface T-O-D-A-Y ;-) That was yesterday. And did you? :-) 73, Stefan --_000_6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEBAD4Fservigilantvigi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan, VLF

>Don't expect better results from a larger antenna at the same loca= tion

Not the same location. I'm using my Tx antenna in Benidorm (IM98wn). M= y grabber runs in Albir, another location at 7km at IM98xn

Finally used a simple audio transformer to connect the vertical LF res= onant antenna to the PC audio card
And results are quite interesting. This is the 24KHz VLF band in a 20 = minutes spectrogram
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fsmk8lbti8ap90d/Benidorm%2090m%20vertical%20= LF%20tuned%20VLF%2024KHz%20spectrogram%2020%20minutes.JPG?dl=3D0

Comparing with Paul's VLF receiver I can see also the same stations he= re. The lower JXN and the S/N are
quite aceptable. http://abelian.org/vlf/spectrum.shtml

The most important is that QRM from lift motors variators is produced = just in a few frequencies, not wipping
all the band. You can see the elevators activity as signals around 16K= Hz, 15KHz, 10.5KHz and strong at 8 and
around 5.5KHz

During the 20min there was a sudden reduction in background noise. Thi= s is not due to modifications in my
settings, but real QRM stopped. Has to investigate why it happens

I made a detailed spectrogram around 8KHz
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cjnsc0mpqdec5ho/Benidorm%2090m%20vertical%20= LF%20tuned%20VLF%208270Hz%20spectrogram.JPG?dl=3D0

Fortunately the offending signals are concentrated on 7700, 8000 and 8= 300Hz. So 8270 with high integration will be out of the
elevators interference, which is a very good news :-)

I need a signal. And connect the audio to 1pps

Tonight I will be tuning the 11.904 Alpha. Seems that there is a faint= h trace in my grabber


73 de Luis
EA5DOM

De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [o= wner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] en nombre de DK7FC [selberdenken@posteo.= de]
Enviado: mi=E9rcoles, 5 de junio de 2019 8:02
Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Asunto: Re: LF: Re: EbNaut considerations for tomorrow...

Hi Luis,

= Moving the grabber to a quiter place is an =93old=94 plan. There are some o= ptions but all of them requiere dedication

= and negotiation. in other words =85. time!

I know :-) Everything needs dedication.

= Using the transmitting antenna for Rx in VLF may be the quick option=

Don't expect better results from a larger antenna at the same location. It may be an option to build an active symmetrical antenna, as recently des= cribed by DF9RB, and lift this as high as possible out of the 'cloud' of QR= M which surrounds the building. But this is a new experimental project whic= h, again, needs time and dedication :-) And it will never give the same good results as you can get from a qui= et location.

I would suggest to use your existing VLF RX antenna and try it out on the a= lternative location, using a notebook running SpecLab. Just for a few minut= es. Use a fast running spectrogram, 500 ms/pixel covering 0...24 kHz. And t= hen take a screen capture...

=

= I=92m looking for 11.907Hz Alpha using the 90m vertical tuned for LF. I can= get fainth traces with the MiniWhip

= from 06 to 10 UTC which can be seen in my grabber. Let=92s see if there is = something detected with the vertical

= despite the elevators QRM

The Alphas are OFF since some months, except some temporary periods taking = a few hours, sometimes with reduced power or not all transmitters active. ZEVS is back with good availability since some time again but it is more ch= allenging to receive it at all.

I=92m using the Perseur for that. The PC soundcard would be better at = that frequency. Must make an interface

= T-O-D-A-Y  ;-)

That was yesterday. And did you? :-)

73, Stefan
--_000_6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA5BEBAD4Fservigilantvigi_--