Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0G9iFGN001818 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:44:26 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gjhWC-0000MZ-2v for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:29:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gjhSk-0000MM-Ag for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:26:18 +0000 Received: from out2-22.antispamcloud.com ([185.201.17.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gjhSW-0002Ja-09 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:26:05 +0000 Received: from [85.60.35.36] (helo=servigilant.vigilant.es) by mx120.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gjhSJ-0018uV-Nh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:26:00 +0100 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448]) by servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:25:41 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?VklHSUxBTlQgTHVpcyBGZXJuw6FuZGV6?= To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :) Thread-Index: AQHUrONQXy67lIFmt0ebFdIL8ZzSFaWwZ02AgABodACAAM5OAA== Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:25:41 +0000 Message-ID: <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA315170AE@servigilant.vigilant.local> References: <176712857.20190115154229@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.0.22] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 85.60.35.36 X-MailAssure-Domain: vigilant.es X-MailAssure-Username: smtpsolarwinds Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=smtpsolarwinds@vigilant.es X-MailAssure-Outgoing-Class: ham X-MailAssure-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.10) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5n3dh958lgrCyR7ilVHTpa1602E9L7XzfQH6nu9C/Fh9KJzpNe6xgvOx q3u0UDjvOw5j2C7YKailx2Uop+U2Gs8m9etQhNgzEtWqBtUXOJSHVTGbEWWnE2yTxqfzAQugcdV0 5VHgj0NwaT3QWPmF1H9IeZjZv1oz6oWKgngYgisMJ0bZP3eYDXxLY7bneVfI6bVpAmL0uQQ1JgMS WpL2zqAf0wQn+qGFwFhnrZWr3AIwIkRInETzFeWnWEMjTrypoGqvX+Tr45cvyJ5XcQcyxd/XcGw+ NQ1dyHKh3d7ssbLrgWkCIn3WhszKF3IF5zl37EQMF99VlWOZVo1sbhkkbsVPcYApuvossj7K7Uun RaN7j99OwzUMJT3GezzeyIFmHLnr7jXzNR45DRBcGqXviIDXs2KsRjKrCowEavDwQuKo7G6HBtyo C/KKjV9r0h9D7JnckpWaLvahyBjmQxBKOzsnNZ6tILGOfNglqio4kQd7pMsJmbYg5MneJhAYyRhh CRNnedn2NHf9ZpIH31pHTuEBIkUL/j1Y48GvmeURQjjE+8FgkNWzVcVRzLdRyqRJAtNfY5JAWnyD N5P6UvtRUSoXixydV//qGKZVGECIv2dJ61OVLoP1Q6wnb/hRIZlIfLEaHGHDukmsgviQSXpmsN22 Tb4Tdy0JXF1Ju3PuLCUkNq5V4WAtJZXC2qV+0qJ7bg11ReDL66hOJ5d8pkycCvucl3Hugae/waPe eXVCBS5QPAlbDjazCbhs7qBpykynMklGXe6NtxCucctsAhNAxppieQn/z8UtFOqwH/iKkWNT4Qw/ si0LtfynHXJe8jzMLqSnt0bc9wObVlKbHN8OtHofiwMSNhsPEiy5Xyanx+eL/lmcqrp+ZgP1Lb5j QzN+1Q6adtB2Oe88dNhukQEZwoi5Rv4UBMc5RaTDZvGKfpBOXyvnBLFBPBorebXvRPde/zEvuGsl KTrRIXcXpFg5ivY= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine3.antispamcloud.com X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Sorry to see the damages Paul. As Chris said very certainly "LF without smoke is QRP" ;-) I would add that LF stands for "Let's Fire" and a "!" should be added at the end 73 de Luis EA5DOM Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [185.201.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [85.60.35.36 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by klubnl.pl id x0G9iFGN001818 Sorry to see the damages Paul. As Chris said very certainly "LF without smoke is QRP" ;-) I would add that LF stands for "Let's Fire" and a "!" should be added at the end 73 de Luis EA5DOM -----Mensaje original----- De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] En nombre de N1BUG Enviado el: martes, 15 de enero de 2019 22:56 Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Asunto: Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :) Eventually I will rebuild it perfect... although I would prefer to start over with a new coil as this one requires too much maintenance. Right now I don't have the luxury of time for any of that. It's solar minimum and I need this thing working. :) I don't trust the inner coil form for HV now, too much carbon: http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-2-1200.jpg So that'll have to get replaced. I will make the connections differently this time! 73, Paul On 1/15/19 10:42 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Hello N1BUG, > > I too have had issues with bolted connections to the variometer. Not > an expensive fix so long as you don't mind a few battle scars, but > knowing you, you probably want it cosmetically perfect again ;) LF > without smoke is QRP... > > Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 2:50:18 PM, you wrote: > >> Thanks to all who monitored and provided reports on this latest test >> of slow JT9 modes. > >> The test ended suddenly around dawn this morning. Here is the reason: > >> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-1-1200.jpg > >> It's the inner coil from the 2200m loading coil / variometer: > >> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-0-1200.jpg > >> I had hoped to be on looking for QSOs tonight, but obviously that is >> not going to be possible. I do not know when I will be QRV again. > >> I have a very busy day today, so the final report on the JT9 test >> might not be ready until tomorrow. > >> 73, >> Paul N1BUG