Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 24E6E380000B6; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:36:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SNq0r-0000Ih-FA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:35:25 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SNq0q-0000IY-Uk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:35:24 +0100 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.8]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNq0o-0001uE-QK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:35:23 +0100 Received: from cpsps-ews12.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.179]) by cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:35:22 +0200 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF104.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.7]) by cpsps-ews12.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:35:22 +0200 Received: from Extensa ([195.241.183.120]) by CPSMTPM-TLF104.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:35:21 +0200 Message-ID: <6CA5F350F70342A783CA2FC7AD42BDE3@Extensa> From: "PA1SDB, Peter" To: References: <4F981FFA.20201@freenet.de> <4F98254C.9050300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4F982D4A.50405@freenet.de> <92C055C51C18431AAC57B494216C5E2F@Extensa> <9EDCCC1902C640C695BF491F98858756@Extensa> <4F9A75DC.9050207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <2C4BC078F362471597757D0586AB27B7@Extensa> <4F9AE19D.9080800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4F9AE19D.9080800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:35:21 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2012 18:35:21.0619 (UTC) FILETIME=[80B4EE30:01CD24A4] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, The reference is tuned into ICV on 20.270 KHz. It looks like that 3rd PC that I test now is the best of 3 sofar. But it runs to short to see details. The TX PC is connected to a passive loop. Not to the Mini Whip. ICV is stable here at that loop and not much effect at the signal during sunrise and sunset. GQD and GBZ fade out totaly at sunset/sunrise. ICV does'nt. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.8 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b42857a5fad6e32377447282c21f62b1 Subject: Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C4_01CD24A4.80C34610" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:480833088:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60494f9ae7243b3b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00C4_01CD24A4.80C34610 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Stefan, The reference is tuned into ICV on 20.270 KHz. It looks like that 3rd PC that I test now is the best of 3 sofar. But it runs to short to see details. The TX PC is connected to a passive loop. Not to the Mini Whip. ICV is stable here at that loop and not much effect at the signal during sunrise and sunset. GQD and GBZ fade out totaly at sunset/sunrise. ICV does'nt. I must say all 4 grabber windows at my Grabber website are locked at 22k1. The localy generated signal in that 47uHz window at my grabber looks good. I'm tuning the power a bit to get just over the noise. That's why it fades in and out :-) (if you just tuned in, I'm only local testing with few 100mW into 12 cm pice of wire :-) I leave the building now, I leave it as it is for now. Btw, I think to see traces of civilization on 8970.00 Hertz. 73's, Peter PA1SDB http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer € To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 6:12 PM Subject: Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ? Hi Peter, Which reference signal are you currently using? I think GBZ and GQD should be optimal for you. I'm using GQD for my 2nd VLF grabber in the moment. 73, Stefan Am 27.04.2012 13:12, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: Tnx Stefan, My 3rd experiment, a 10 year old notebook, ASUS PC has just (10h UTC) begun generating a trace at 8970.1 Herz. Lets see what happens in the next hours. I will buy such soundcard as you sugest for USB port if this 3rd PC fail's to... CU. Peter - PA1SDB ------=_NextPart_000_00C4_01CD24A4.80C34610 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Hi Stefan,
The reference is tuned into ICV on 20.270 KHz. = It looks=20 like that 3rd PC that I test now is the best of 3 sofar. But it runs to = short to=20 see details.
The TX PC is connected to a passive loop. Not = to the=20 Mini Whip. ICV is stable here at that loop and not much effect at the = signal=20 during sunrise and sunset.
GQD and GBZ fade out totaly at sunset/sunrise. = ICV=20 does'nt.
 
I must say all 4 grabber windows at my Grabber = website=20 are locked at 22k1.
 
The localy generated signal in that 47uHz = window at=20 my grabber looks good. I'm tuning the power a bit to get just over the=20 noise.
That's why it fades in and out = :-)
 
(if you just tuned in, I'm only local testing = with few=20 100mW into 12 cm pice of wire :-)
 
I leave the building  now,  I leave = it as it=20 is for now.
 
Btw, I think to see traces of civilization on = 8970.00=20 Hertz.
 
73's, Peter PA1SDB
 
http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/=
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=C3=A4fer=20 =E2=82=AC
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 = 6:12=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Generating = 8970 Hz=20 carrier with Spectrum Lab ?

Hi Peter,

Which reference signal are you = currently=20 using? I think GBZ and GQD should be optimal for you. I'm using GQD = for my 2nd=20 VLF grabber in the moment.

73, Stefan

Am 27.04.2012 = 13:12,=20 schrieb PA1SDB, Peter:=20
Tnx Stefan,
My 3rd experiment, a 10 year old notebook, = ASUS PC=20 has just (10h UTC) begun generating a trace at 8970.1 Herz. Lets see = what=20 happens in the next hours.
I will buy such soundcard as you sugest = for USB port=20 if this 3rd PC fail's to...
 
CU.
 
Peter - PA1SDB
 
------=_NextPart_000_00C4_01CD24A4.80C34610--