Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CC542380001B0; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 13:43:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U1i24-0000EM-48 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:41:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U1i23-0000EC-NP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:41:43 +0000 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U1i22-0005rW-6X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:41:42 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.16.88]) by mwinf5d23 with ME id vWhL1k00H1u02qi03WhLmk; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:41:21 +0100 Message-ID: <6C230B07F678435FBE63BBFCA054CA90@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <014001ce0171$3da07060$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <014001ce0171$3da07060$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:41:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Kejserens nye Klæder Ring any bells ? From: mal hamilton Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 6:15 PM To: rsgb Subject: LF: wspr sigs [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 0b36c952c26be93e626fe2fa1c93657f Subject: Re: LF: wspr sigs Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CE0174.E4CFC9A0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6186510d5e4314ad X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CE0174.E4CFC9A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kejserens nye Kl=E6der Ring any bells ? From: mal hamilton=20 Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 6:15 PM To: rsgb=20 Subject: LF: wspr sigs WSPR experts. I am receiving two signals at 10dB different time slots that are = swamping the weaker WSPR signals active at the same time. Are these strong signals swamping the weak signals therefore rendering = decoding of weak signals impossible ?? I have switched to the larger antenna and getting very strong signals at = over 10db covering up the weaker signals=20 Your observations pse de g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CE0174.E4CFC9A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Kejserens nye = Kl=E6der
 
Ring  any  = bells =20 ?

From: mal hamilton
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 6:15 PM
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: wspr sigs

WSPR experts.
I am receiving two signals at 10dB different = time slots=20 that are swamping the weaker WSPR signals active at the same = time.
Are these strong signals swamping the weak = signals=20 therefore rendering decoding of weak signals impossible ??
I have switched to the larger antenna and = getting very=20 strong signals at over 10db covering up the weaker signals
Your observations pse
de g3kev
 
------=_NextPart_000_00CC_01CE0174.E4CFC9A0--