Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dh07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dh07.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.27]) by air-mc08.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMC084-a98e4b4ceb393dc; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:35:53 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dh07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 66EEE3800018F; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:35:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NUoOC-0001sQ-MS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:00 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NUoOC-0001sH-5N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:00 +0000 Received: from smtp5.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.151] helo=smtp6.freeserve.com) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NUoOA-0001Le-N2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:00 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3509.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 586EA700008F for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:34:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3509.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4BBE07000097 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:34:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.7.57]) by mwinf3509.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 0592E700008F for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:34:52 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20100112213453229.0592E700008F@mwinf3509.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <6B4084BD5301434698A5AB201CD4999E@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <13bd0.a4f87a8.387d2050@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <13bd0.a4f87a8.387d2050@aol.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:34:42 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0049_01CA93CF.0D59C220" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411b4b4ceb363b4e X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01CA93CF.0D59C220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok Klaus ,=20 Well yes for me I have no problem , my cw rx is not as good as = tx hi but its ok and data is just as much fun as well ..... the pro= blem is when you have spent all your life operating a radio as you= career .. and now it is only a hobby .. you see the 'evil data'= as the devils device that put you out of a job ...the same with= sail boats, steam trains and old motor vehicles... full of expe= rts .. .. for me .. well my job is to think of new , commission= and modify so for me no difference tapping plastic keys (like= now) or brass ones now and then=20 73 - G .=20 From: kkorn42@aol.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 12:46 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW... Hi dr Graham, well, it was funny to read the mails for a while ... but not any longe= r. Yes I know that song and its ending: "backfill" and "poetic justice"= are good words.=20 I stand for an amateur community that is tolerant! I do CW in 99% of my QSOs (since 50 years) - but I am also vy interest= ed in WSPR. I can see no problem in this, fullstop. The whole thing will come to an end in the not too distant future, whe= n none of us old chaps will be around anymore - and no young hams will= be there to fill the gaps and no authority will have to ponder about= frequ. allocations for a freak-community whose members think, that th= ey have to cross the ocean on foot. 73 de Klaus dj6lb ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01CA93CF.0D59C220 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok Klaus ,
 
Well  yes = for me I have no=20 problem , my  cw rx is not as  good  as  tx hi but= its ok=20 and data is just as much fun as well .....  the  problem is= when=20 you  have  spent all your  life operating  a radio= as=20 you  career .. and  now it is only a  hobby .. you = ;=20 see  the  'evil data' as the  devils device that put&nb= sp;=20 you  out of a job ...the  same with  sail boats, steam= =20 trains  and old  motor vehicles...  full  of&= nbsp;=20 experts ..  .. for  me .. well  my  job is=20 to think of  new , commission and  modify=20    so  for  me  no difference tapping pl= astic keys=20 (like now)  or brass ones now and then
 
73 - G .
 

Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 12:46 AM
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW...

Hi dr Graham,
well, it was funny to read the mails for a while ... but not any= =20 longer.
Yes I know that song and its ending: "backfill" and "poetic justi= ce" are=20 good words.
I stand for an amateur community that is tolerant!
I do CW in 99% of my QSOs (since 50 years) - but I am also= vy=20 interested in WSPR. I can see no problem in this, fullstop.
 
The whole thing will come to an end in the not too distant future= , when=20 none of us old chaps will be around anymore - and no young hams will= be there to=20 fill the gaps and no authority will have to ponder about frequ. alloca= tions for=20 a freak-community whose members think, that they have to cross the oce= an on=20 foot.
 
73
de Klaus
dj6lb

------=_NextPart_000_0049_01CA93CF.0D59C220--