Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2E734380000B2; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:38:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Uq3pr-0004TK-2z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:05:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Uq3pq-0004TB-JD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:05:14 +0100 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Uq3po-0007Ir-8l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:05:13 +0100 Received: from AGB ([95.145.211.204]) by mwinf5d48 with ME id r4581l00B4R9LNv03458qF; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:05:11 +0200 Message-ID: <6AAA136040F6401A91A8D2B2D6F06F0B@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <6CCE2CE4841C49D39BC5810DDC9E4D88@White> <51BE367C.3040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51BE6AB5.4030505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51BEF3FD.90605@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <71C2BD63B2FC4F2EA23383DFA6657557@AGB> <51C04EED.60908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51C0E571.2020107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <145A8CBDD36B4CB7B78A5B750BBCE398@AGB> <000e01ce6c93$f23eb030$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <51C1914F.70503@charter.net> <51C1A4FD.6030400@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <227A9E203A3F40F7A5CF50E8FC7C7822@AGB> <51C2FC05.4020009@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <98415A615E4C4DF08B26461C02C274A7@AGB> <51C36896.5060900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <081A3386AB9D4358A821F4E5C0F31D80@White> In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:05:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Joe, Sorry to read that , nothing showing on the map , Not sure if you need to leave a 'gap' after each tx 'cycle' the software switches to Rx , to scan for the lowest s/n qrg , then returns to Tx , this only takes a very short time 1-2 seconds and applies only to audio 'tx drive' [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA OP32 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604951c4819117be X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Joe, Sorry to read that , nothing showing on the map , Not sure if you need to leave a 'gap' after each tx 'cycle' the software switches to Rx , to scan for the lowest s/n qrg , then returns to Tx , this only takes a very short time 1-2 seconds and applies only to audio 'tx drive' As the clocking is self generating , its possible , no gap is needed , but short gap would do no harm [ couple of seconds] the dsp engine will handle multiple 'randomly spaced' decodes , so there are no start/stop over lap issues , as a minimum of 50% randomly distributed of the tx stream is needed to de-code , missing the start or any part of the signal is not de-bar to the final de-code Good luck -73 -Graham -------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 8:34 AM To: Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA OP32 > Hi Markus, > > Thank-you for monitoring. There may have also been a problem at this end > after the first transmission. Will get it sorted and try again tonight > starting at 00 utc, using Grahams suggestion to maximise the duty cycle. > > 73 > Joe > > On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Markus Vester wrote: > >> Joe, >> >> sorry not a trace here yet, neither in the spectrogram nor in the >> correlator output. We've had unusually hot and humid weather here this >> week and the grabbers were completely swamped by QRN. Early this morning >> a cold front passed by. The Loran lines have reappeared, and we can hope >> for improved receive conditions for the nights to come. >> >> Best 73, >> Markus (DF6NM) >> >> >> From: jcraig@mun.ca >> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 12:14 AM >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: LF: VO1NA OP32 >> >> >> Dear Group, >> >> With many thanks to the group members for their kind assistance, Markus >> and Graham in particular, A satisfactory exciter is presently QRV >> and will be returning the OP32 code (that Makus recently sent by email) >> on 137.555 kHz starting tonight 20 June at 2359 utc. The back-yard photon >> flux will be ~10^30/s. >> >> Good luck to any who will be monitoring and please feel free to let >> me know if you receive an indication of the sigs. >> >> 73 >> Joe >> > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >