Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Received: from mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.137]) by air-mc05.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINMC052-a9684ba3540e1ac; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:38:06 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2DA313800008B; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:38:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NsZZl-0004r7-EK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:37:09 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NsZZk-0004qy-Tc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:37:08 +0000 Received: from cpsmtpm-eml105.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.9]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cpm@planet.nl>) id 1NsZZi-0003As-BU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:37:08 +0000 Received: from ns94d01ae4d850 ([81.204.139.159]) by CPSMTPM-EML105.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.0.6001.18000); Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:37:05 +0100 Message-ID: <6A859CF85CA14F5591C7EEF4DBE10D48@ns94d01ae4d850> From: "henny van elst" <cpm@planet.nl> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> References: <BFF6723B062BFF40B4B7A6CF670160B403272640@argos2.clb.tcfr.thales> <4BA25218.7040905@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <EEAD9480C9204B99B75EC1EBB9BB78B1@ns94d01ae4d850> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B74@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:36:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2010 10:37:05.0376 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E563E00:01CAC750] X-Spam-Score: 3.4 (+++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK=3.36,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: VLF: more RX stns needed Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001A_01CAC758.792863A0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60894ba3540d3fc6 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01CAC758.792863A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, our distance is 357km, henny cpm best 73s ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 10:01 AM Subject: AW: VLF: more RX stns needed Henny, thank you! That's nice. Your RX stn is very good on LF and i= am sure you will also have a good VLF RX :-) What is our distance? I think less than 400km!? Let's dream :-) 73, Stefan PS: The next time i think it is a good idea to transmit a "K" in DFC= W-600. That's a combination out of a long carrier and a real informati= on and a good mode for first dx tests. Since i transmit DFCW without= gaps between dash and dot it will take exactly 30 minutes, further in= formation. After that secqence, the full callsign and a message in DFC= W-60 might be an idea... Let's see... PPS: Our radio club has a long friendship with the radio amateurs in= bar le duc, france. There, near verdun, we stay each year (for me sin= ce 10 years) and participate on the VHF contest but also some acty on= HF. This year i plan to be qrv as F/DK7FC on LF and maybe also on VLF= (if there is still interest ;-) ). It is always the first fully weeke= nd in september. Last year i was active with a J-antenna on 160m, so= a vertical end fed half wave antenna, 82m long, 100m up. No nerving= radials, no lossy matching coil. The transformer is a RG58 cable, abt= 28m long, surely with some losses but it must be less than 3db since= i apply 600W (here in DL) without any SWR-changes. So, the kite took the 82m wire PLUS the 28m RG58, without problems!= And the wind was not too strong. The best thing about this story is= that i have put this antenna into the sky on saturday afternoon and,= since 160m is rather interesting at night, have let it there until i= was tired and go to bed/marquee. Since i was to tired and it was dark= i just let the kite at the sky! And, in the morning, it was still on= the sky! If it would have dropped once, it would never go up again si= nce there were trees that cause turbolences... I put it down in the af= ternoon, after 24hours! So, what this tells us here, discussing VLF, is, that it is often no= problem to be QRV with the kite without watching it the whole time an= d have to be afraid that it comes down. So DFCW-600 is no problem, if= the wind comes from south-west. That's my observation on this QTH. So= i will choose a good time for the next test, just like at the last... That it get's not boring just to transmit there, all those german (o= r other) stns who have received the signal should come with a bottle= of wine and so on, to have a big party,hi ;-) You know the exact QTH!= :-)) 73, Stefan/DK7FC ----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------- Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org im Auftrag von henny van els= t Gesendet: Do 18.03.2010 23:12 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: VLF: more RX stns needed Hi Stefan, I am also standby on 8,9khz henny pa3cpm best 73s ----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com=20 Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2755 - Release Date: 03/1= 8/10 19:33:00 ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01CAC758.792863A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML dir=3Dltr><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-88= 59-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.21089" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY text=3D#000000 bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi Stefan,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>our distance is 357km,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>henny cpm</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>best 73s</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-L= EFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color:= black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dschaefer@hst.tu-darmstadt.de href=3D"mailto:schaefer@= hst.tu-darmstadt.de">Stefan Sch=E4fer</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=3Drsgb_lf_group@= blacksheep.org href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_l= f_group@blacksheep.org</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, March 19, 2010= 10:01=20 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> AW: VLF: more RX stn= s=20 needed</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV id=3DidOWAReplyText19486 dir=3Dltr> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Henny, th= ank you! That's=20 nice. Your RX stn is very good on LF and i am sure you will also hav= e a good=20 VLF RX :-)</FONT></DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>What is our distance? I= think less than=20 400km!?</FONT></DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Let's dream :-)</FONT></D= IV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>73, Stefan</FONT></DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>PS: The next time i think= it is a good=20 idea to transmit a "K" in DFCW-600. That's a combination out of a lo= ng carrier=20 and a real information and a good mode for first dx tests. Since i= transmit=20 DFCW without gaps between dash and dot it will take exactly 30 minut= es,=20 further information. After that secqence, the full callsign and a me= ssage in=20 DFCW-60 might be an idea... Let's see...</FONT></DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>PPS: Our radio club has= a long friendship=20 with the radio amateurs in <EM>bar le duc</EM>, france. There, near= =20 verdun, we stay each year (for me since 10 years) and participa= te on the=20 VHF contest but also some acty on HF. This year i plan to be qrv as= F/DK7FC on=20 LF and maybe also on VLF (if there is still interest ;-) ). It is al= ways the=20 first fully weekend in september. Last year i was active with a J-an= tenna on=20 160m, so a vertical end fed half wave antenna, 82m long, 100m up. No= nerving=20 radials, no lossy matching coil. The transformer is a RG58 cable, ab= t 28m=20 long, surely with some losses but it must be less than 3db since i= apply 600W=20 (here in DL) without any SWR-changes.</FONT></DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>So, the kite took the 82m= wire PLUS the=20 28m RG58, without problems! And the wind was not too strong. The bes= t thing=20 about this story is that i have put this antenna into the sky on sat= urday=20 afternoon and, since 160m is rather interesting at night, have let= it there=20 until i was tired and go to bed/marquee. Since i was to tired and it= was dark=20 i just let the kite at the sky! And, in the morning, it was still on= the sky!=20 If it would have dropped once, it would never go up again since ther= e were=20 trees that cause turbolences... I put it down in the afternoon, afte= r=20 24hours!</FONT></DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>So, what this tells us he= re, discussing=20 VLF, is, that it is often no problem to be QRV with the kite without= watching=20 it the whole time and have to be afraid that it comes down. So DFCW-= 600 is no=20 problem, if the wind comes from south-west. That's my observation on= this QTH.=20 So i will choose a good time for the next test, just like at the=20 last...</FONT></DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>That it get's not boring= just to transmit=20 there, all those german (or other) stns who have received the signal= should=20 come with a bottle of wine and so on, to have a big party,hi ;-= ) You know=20 the exact QTH! :-))</FONT></DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>73, Stefan/DK7FC</FONT></= DIV></DIV> <DIV dir=3Dltr><BR> <HR tabIndex=3D-1> <FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>Von:</B> owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksh= eep.org im=20 Auftrag von henny van elst<BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Do 18.03.2010=20 23:12<BR><B>An:</B> rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org<BR><B>Betreff:</B>= Re: VLF:=20 more RX stns needed<BR></FONT><BR></DIV> <DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi Stefan,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I am also standby on 8,9khz</FONT><= /DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>henny pa3cpm</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>best 73s</FONT></DIV></DIV> <P> <HR> <P></P><BR>No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>Checked by AV= G -=20 www.avg.com <BR>Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2755 - Re= lease=20 Date: 03/18/10 19:33:00<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01CAC758.792863A0--