Return-Path: Received: from rly-mg10.mx.aol.com (rly-mg10.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.116]) by air-mg08.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMG082-a384b02e590f5; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:04:46 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mg10.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG102-a384b02e590f5; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:04:02 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NASO9-0004m3-JV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:02:49 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NASO9-0004lu-3C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:02:49 +0000 Received: from web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.122]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NASO8-0001Qa-Tq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:02:49 +0000 Received: (qmail 30722 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Nov 2009 18:02:42 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1258480962; bh=kv2i7Im9KnkRqUi1So3LxEJ/JLGf/1WxDDHvWmv1I6Y=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=io/NcwHUjQ8InTEvFVtz4B+ZnGecdHVl2EQJgiLWPXKqC2pDiR9TmjwP+wOXPjWmTkOknvfU+BwuCfj4shZ9iFgOsxqHz2YmRk5V4wWEK7WplMJOCfTEvFjgDb1yiu6LktXntqaNoVYESLGvAxSJFRnZcLOdO0LvtXq+6nRjdP8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=w9zDpxyXwClPgq/xWKFHIaHMH4B0+1iMioDsdkB+Y3njwH+LZCvWxS0OKd7lhGWCKi6Dw23vL9dltJ+flYZRoyh61sgrUcxUS8BXjimFZpQP1vN/PVjfsSkkVqmQrs7O+QuAnGeSW+1PkliFtSZ1DI7VmL9S1CbjcMqlkbQq1UQ=; Message-ID: <689208.30151.qm@web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: zKnKseEVM1k5dfUj.P97Dj3bnUyKpe2bKbWzNHdQIVUd5ryqg_jNpl0yozT8Ed7pFlVlNjJXmgO_5Dlx_MONbVpPVxQTwVQ3icGbysNPI8iPLRyyVnLTKt9f7pCfqzes75p2SvefEuPXx.9g84jENld25tff3.8HoQx0jcvAJBoLUffgO0j_aRfTLfzyTgp.O0WfbsyzWjSRdPdTmmMxCcuIWJnyQBfgYWZpsrgJPnAoFoRZABr31YaIzzwooVSwEU5oJiiCqw37e3BviVioYrEPJ9jz0jQxth1KmNByByzhOP3w45FmncmFqw7K6.vD9FXUGdYe Received: from [81.155.114.50] by web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:02:42 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/8.1.6 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.4 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:02:42 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4B02D31B.9090106@usa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Karma: unknown: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1026257346-1258480962=:30151" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d263.2 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : pass --0-1026257346-1258480962=:30151 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tnx Alberto =A0 I think the SR front end is quite wide infact so it would be really good= to have so much BW. Anyway=A0its not a problem to broarden the F/E filter= ing. Currently use same input for Rx on 3.5 through 10 megs and my guess= is with degraded performance it would do 14megs as well. =A0 Yep I have a choise of SC=A0ASIO driver for the current arrangement. I hav= e to say that when all else fails Winrad just ploughs on such a robust app= lication. =A0 I currently integrate=A0all my Data applications with SDR on RX via=A0a VA= C=A0a very=A0neat arrangement no messy multiple PC connectivity!. Built an= RXTX some time ago and now working on=A0Data TX side of things. =A0 Anyway thanks again info well receiver here.=A0=A0=A0 73 petefmt=A0 --- On Tue, 17/11/09, Alberto di Bene wrote: From: Alberto di Bene Subject: Re: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr? To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tuesday, 17 November, 2009, 16:45 M0FMT wrote:=20 Veeeery interesting Alberto =A0 Would that give me 192 Kc/s of tunable band width on my SDR radio given th= e right software? There has been a lot of debate on the softrock reflector but this one seem= s to quite good. Do you have first hand experience of it? Christmas is com= ing ...hee hee. =A0 73 petefmt Pete, =A0 yes, I have one and I am quite satisfied with it. It can sample at 192= kHz, so it will give you from -96 to +96 kHz of band around the center frequency tuned with the Softrock. Assuming of course th= at the low pass filters of the Softrock let such a large portion of the spectrum pass unaffected... usually they cut at a= value rather lower than that.... you will probably=20 have to change some capacitors. The fact that it does not need an external power supply is handy too... A suggestion : if you will use Winrad for it, set it to use the ASIO drive= rs to interface the card. You will then fully benefit of the 24-bit amplitude resolution. 73=A0 Alberto=A0 i2PHD =20 --0-1026257346-1258480962=:30151 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tnx Alberto
 
I think the SR front end is quite wide infact so it would be really= good to have so much BW. Anyway its not a problem to broarden the F/= E filtering. Currently use same input for Rx on 3.5 through 10 megs and my= guess is with degraded performance it would do 14megs as well.
 
Yep I have a choise of SC ASIO driver for the current arrangemen= t. I have to say that when all else fails Winrad just ploughs on such a ro= bust application.
 
I currently integrate all my Data applications with SDR on RX vi= a a VAC a very neat arrangement no messy multiple PC connec= tivity!. Built an RXTX some time ago and now working on Data TX side= of things.
 
Anyway thanks again info well receiver here.    73 pet= efmt 

--- On Tue, 17/11/09, Alberto di Bene <dibene@u= sa.net> wrote:

From: Alberto di Bene <dibene@usa.net>Subject: Re: LF: G7NKS - Double Side Band: wspr?
To: rsgb_lf_group@bl= acksheep.org
Date: Tuesday, 17 November, 2009, 16:45

M0FMT wrote:=20
Veeeery interesting Alberto
 
Would that give me 192 Kc/s of tunable band width on my SDR radio= given the right software?
There has been a lot of debate on the softro= ck reflector but this one seems to quite good. Do you have first hand expe= rience of it? Christmas is coming ...hee hee.
 
73 petefmt

Pete,

  yes, I have one and I am quite satisfied with it. It= can sample at 192 kHz, so it will give you from -96 to +96 kHz of bandaround the center frequency tuned with the Softrock. Assuming of course= that the low pass filters of the Softrock let such
a large portion of= the spectrum pass unaffected... usually they cut at a value rather lower= than that.... you will probably
have to change some capacitors.
The fact that it does not need an external power supply is handy too...<= BR>
A suggestion : if you will use Winrad for it, set it to use the ASI= O drivers to interface the card. You will then fully benefit
of the 24-= bit amplitude resolution.

73  Alberto  i2PHD


=20 --0-1026257346-1258480962=:30151--