Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v38I4okK009964 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2017 20:04:51 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cwugV-0002Fo-MV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 19:02:03 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cwugV-0002Ff-45 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 19:02:03 +0100 Received: from nm49-vm2.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.87.232]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1cwugR-0000Fp-7Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 19:02:01 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.ca Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s2048; t=1491674516; bh=uzsv69+QxJE8Jng/uIzbNA9gM9eRAWeiFnjVVYMq0oY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=sleiWihM2PLzAVw6E09hchP96kZe2hys/I0sNSMs0gks+b7KVowNMRgACJ4eXKgVXXuM06cg2WvWujFmBr+6CLHbv8iKQ0BtfqNFhv+JrO4rQFj0B5eN52EQK+2PHiKlLHEUJY7udwtZmFW3+Ybm0xfIL2UkLRhzwe92n6/QRuymuaGr8f3Q1G4NE9WAo89qzAYE/w16EoLSoTuS6RhMn+f9RXE9a7mYON5FGW+Lf/UINy1Wo35o1fe7ETRep4a+e0ZJfZ3l5MFotxzqxcrNYWEDnUw7AW+bfh8ZlOejw3oU1F9pCTkOM+dUtf3JzUCw8/OOGpfakftUycRz+KaOew== Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm49.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2017 18:01:56 -0000 Received: from [98.137.12.191] by nm49.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2017 17:58:55 -0000 Received: from [98.137.12.200] by tm12.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2017 17:58:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1008.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2017 17:58:55 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 237059.32053.bm@omp1008.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: uYjrwbYVM1kHmTRaG7PckHj3rJ1W0xzEgRlxv0RFZuEjGB3xDARJasE6ZG0maFf 3bp20dammzEgszuOaWdJATfUREroJ84h0gLbkNF3JagiiwMdPz_9FTKHhUFzmlyrq6E.7F5mEH6D 8rEbNFhujsVNwaXAg_N7uiQLH_3bwKlWFtgGBAvi1LhLYOIwzKqUe_YH3Inl3C79Ifm16A6M7Z7M UYpLHjhDvG7xFV6edLKPvCgNyNUYhFoVrWQlTHilH4kRqs0_f2iZfHSWjxpn.B.PPIss.v9WVJ.m avJIw6ec3Zx9l8TbNQxtkbQDG0xSlyHNeFMLGofVV_GH4dXTHlu9bm6oS0NjOySOPTJHkt1gGE7. n4p4dS8O1FgKPrjRqpEptt4A00gTnpyUeviR3ejTNvBYs4OFPiTOYRd7Eyhf5jI1r0n_ODRLNKUA nocMHfWQKIdiR_f6htNdZ43L1h_SyW8VW0ZV7T4Cpfq2e.JBfFIrCyorD1xTo1hUD4yogGP8YJ5O TzS2hbJ._X0RTBKXIS0FI66lUZ_2Au8vlpZVMATyk6CYOuhFB2k9vtyyTQbDTMDt0A.SA6hD7uFx fvAI- Received: from jws300075.mail.gq1.yahoo.com by sendmailws117.mail.gq1.yahoo.com; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:58:54 +0000; 1491674334.875 Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 17:58:54 +0000 (UTC) From: John Fisher To: Cc: Message-ID: <68858815.2799186.1491674334546@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <68858815.2799186.1491674334546.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.9272 YahooMailBasic Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/56.0.2924.87 Safari/537.36 X-Scan-Signature: d63ea50e288c5ecb9bd7a86eeabe94f2 Subject: Re: LF: Wilkinson combiners Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by lipkowski.org id v38I4okK009964 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11160 Hi Chris, To me, it doesn't sound like a good idea to combine two switching square wave signals together...Might be okay if they were synchronized...Better to filter them into sine waves first and then combine them...More expensive for double the number of iron powder toroids though... Jay is combining them ahead of the filter...That type of combiner must work okay that way. Cheers, John VA3VVV -------------------------------------------- On Sat, 4/8/17, Chris Wilson wrote: Subject: Re: LF: Wilkinson combiners To: "Markus Vester" Received: Saturday, April 8, 2017, 12:42 PM Hello Markus, Thanks for the detailed reply, let me see if i have this straight though please, sorry if I appear a bit dense, it's probably because I am.... :) Right now I run one voltage mode Class D push pull amp into a T type low pass filter. All works great, nice gate and drain wave forms, and my Scopematch box shows perfect sinusoidal wave forms for voltage and current after the T type filter. Modest output transformer warming, each pair of FET's near as damn it cold. I add another duplicate amp and the Wilkinson combiner. The combiner feeds the T type filter. With either one or both amps running the gate and drain wave forms go to pot, the FET's run mad hot, as does the output transformer (and the power input choke gets hot, too, which it doesn't with a single amp straight into the filter). Are you suggesting I build a duplicate T type filter bank and put a filter between each amp and the combiner, with no filter on the output of the combiner, just run the antenna co-ax to the matching transformer and loading coil which are outside? I can do this, it means finding and buying some more big toroids, but it's perfectly possible.... Is the W1VD combiner what people call a "broadband" combiner? And if I built this instead of the Wilkinson one would I be able to run it in front of my single T type filter? Or do I still need a pair of filters between it and the two amp's outputs? To remind, the W1VD one is here: http://www.w1vd.com/137-500-500WCombiner.pdf Thanks  for  your patience, and thanks Graham for your input too, just don't  want to waste time and money building things that are incorrect due to my ignorance! > Hi Chris, > the PI-type combiner per se is not the problem. All I was trying to > say is that you have to prevent it from short-circuiting the > harmonics directly at the output of a (voltage-mode) class-D PA. In > that case, I would recommend a T-type low-pass filter between each > PA and combiner input, starting with a series inductor rather than a shunt capacitor. > Note that the desired harmonic load impedance depends on the type > of Class-D PA: Voltage-mode class D with rectangular voltage and > sinusoidal current should see a high impedance termination for > harmonics, i.e. an inductor or series resonant circuit. On the other > hand, current-mode class D designs would have sinusoidal voltage and > rectangular current, and require a low-impedance shunt for harmonics. > Best 73, > Markus -- Best regards, Chris                            mailto:dead_fets@gmail.com