Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.101 with SMTP id vb5csp17323igc; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:15:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.95.195 with SMTP id dm3mr15128814wjb.17.1394997354310; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f18si3436921wiw.2.2014.03.16.12.15.53 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WPFjb-0001SQ-L2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 18:24:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WPFjb-0001SH-53 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 18:24:31 +0000 Received: from omr-m01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.143.75]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WPFjZ-0006wS-1f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 18:24:30 +0000 Received: from mtaout-mbb02.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mbb02.mx.aol.com [172.26.254.110]) by omr-m01.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 8EF027020C952 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 14:24:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Black (95-91-237-52-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.237.52]) by mtaout-mbb02.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 0FE1F3800009C for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 14:24:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <66969CAA0F5048F88FCF921DEE91B516@Black> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <094701cf411d$421dcce0$c65966a0$@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:24:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1394994265; bh=75ZHgBTBRwRlZU4+eZhdTLXNei11CJvufLMTmULa6y8=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Z491EeQkbMiRr7teIX6z3cCiwn/jUWTrTG/+k2yXJsetgIEvuUDqbXzV29LJLdKy3 ab5/FUhZpN63VR4sprCAQKJrqodRuzGrISkSD2f4tww5BmuFbPkwR0/eYk1NHMe9A1 QKCgNCIrrU2tAK+m2AWAr9mOvwTpFJJ828qKdK7s= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afe6e5325ec580f3c X-AOL-IP: 95.91.237.52 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ah, solar zenith angle, not that of the VLF ray. Got it. 73, Markus ----- Original Message ----- From: Markus Vester To: Sunday, March 16, 2014 6:05 PM Subject: LF: Re: DHO Link ... Not sure if I understand zenith angle dependence of the beta parameter - is this not just an electron density gradient, vertically measured? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [64.12.143.75 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 47a967f57bae6380aac0a0062beb1b4e Subject: LF: Re: Re: DHO Link Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01CF414D.514928B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CF414D.514928B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ah, solar zenith angle, not that of the VLF ray. Got it. 73, Markus ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Markus Vester=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 6:05 PM Subject: LF: Re: DHO Link ... Not sure if I understand zenith angle dependence of the beta parameter - = is this not just an electron density gradient, vertically measured?=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CF414D.514928B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ah, solar zenith angle, not that of the = VLF ray.=20 Got it.  73, Markus
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Markus = Vester=20
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 6:05 PM
Subject: LF: Re: DHO Link

...
Not sure if = I understand zenith angle=20 dependence of the beta parameter - is this not just an electron = density=20 gradient, vertically measured?
 
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CF414D.514928B0--