Return-Path: Received: from rly-da01.mx.aol.com (rly-da01.mail.aol.com [172.19.129.75]) by air-da03.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA034-a5047a0bba91ec; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:02:57 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-da01.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDA018-a5047a0bba91ec; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:02:20 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JKHFB-00056A-Ex for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:01:05 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JKHFA-000561-Uj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:01:04 +0000 Received: from web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.124]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JKHFA-0008Gb-Pw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:01:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 51336 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jan 2008 18:00:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=UvlqkoCjCqVrBm6/JG6gvziT3xrIGjB0pZuhD5C68NnW6xJoeuJ0GVFW7VaBAFp1hAYxvIFD/xSV49tmW0j22TYc/jlwbPSsSTIiPEKGEjb+SYwedqxfauVWg3JSlhVptBQTySboVvI7wPuHG6krramjAVfKxHBbFOnen2B+yLc=; X-YMail-OSG: HEZ1oDAVM1l7vU5bydlEUo4GJr_2XNCDKVNrlEs0nmJsuOGXXJ6yuIJ6PzmzyoHMVw-- Received: from [86.130.73.228] by web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:00:35 GMT Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:00:35 +0000 (GMT) From: Peter March To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <004201c86362$242e7b70$3005a8c0@AndrewPoodle> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <664896.50557.qm@web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-Karma: 0: DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: RE: TNX Dom ... Feb 1st approaches ...600m ... SP? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1005917421-1201716035=:50557" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0-1005917421-1201716035=:50557 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Many thanks Dominic. I obviously have not been reading the mail closely enough. Looks like you asked the right question. I have not progressed my rig beyond Xtal control because of the uncertanty about access to 600m. Once again many thanks for the reply. Hope to work you on 600m if we can hang on to it. 73 Petefmt ines@netbanx.com> wrote: v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } Peter, I asked this and John Gould said this: Dom, thanks for raising the issue of the NoV, as I guess others are keen to know where we all stand. RSGB, at its quarterly meeting with Ofcom last September, raised the issue of NoV extension, as well as requesting an increase of ERP. As you may recall several of the correspondents on this reflector provided me with some useful material for our case. Ofcom commented then that they would need to gain a view from the primary user, Maritime and Coastguard Agency, as well as wait until the outcome of WRC-07 was known. I view that as sensible, since apart from the small matter of RR5.83 that prohibited non-distress use of the band 495-505kHz, there was an WRC agenda item concerning maritime use of the spectrum in this area of interest. We had a further quarterly meeting with Ofcom last week and we were told that they would be making an announcement concerning the matter during the first half of February. There is nothing that individual NoV holders need to do apart from wait patiently! As far as your own NoV is concerned I suggest that you progress it again - I haven't seen the application. 73 John, G3WKL RSGB HF Manager g3wkl@btinternet.com 73 Dom --------------------------------- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Peter March Sent: 30 January 2008 16:43 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Feb 1st approaches ...600m ... SP? Hi All Does any one know the fate of UK 600m ? Nothing on the RSGB News other than the ON killer Watts ;-) 73 Petefmt --------------------------------- Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! for Good --------------------------------- Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! for Good --0-1005917421-1201716035=:50557 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Many thanks Dominic.
 
I obviously have not been reading the mail closely enough.
 
Looks like you asked the right question.
 
I have not progressed my rig beyond Xtal control because of the uncertanty about access to 600m.
 
Once again many thanks for the reply.
 
Hope to work you on 600m if we can hang on to it.
 
73 Petefmt

ines@netbanx.com> wrote:
Peter,
 
I asked this and John Gould said this:
 
Dom, thanks for raising the issue of the NoV, as I guess others are keen to know where we all stand.
 
RSGB, at its quarterly meeting with Ofcom last September, raised the issue
of NoV extension, as well as requesting an increase of ERP.   As you may
recall several of the correspondents on this reflector provided me with some useful material for our case.  Ofcom commented then that they would need to gain a view from the primary user, Maritime and Coastguard Agency, as well as wait until the outcome of WRC-07 was known.  I view that as sensible, since apart from the small matter of RR5.83 that prohibited non-distress use of the band 495-505kHz, there was an WRC agenda item concerning maritime use of the spectrum in this area of interest.  We had a further quarterly meeting with Ofcom last week and we were told that they would be making an announcement concerning the matter during the first half of February. 
 
There is nothing that individual NoV holders need to do apart from wait patiently!
 
As far as your own NoV is concerned I suggest that you progress it again - I haven't seen the application. 
 
73 John, G3WKL
RSGB HF Manager
 
g3wkl@btinternet.com
 
 
73
Dom
 
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Peter March
Sent: 30 January 2008 16:43
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Feb 1st approaches ...600m ... SP?
 

Hi All
 
Does any one know the fate of UK 600m ?
 
Nothing on the RSGB News other than the ON killer Watts  ;-)
 
73 Petefmt
 
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! for Good

Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! for Good --0-1005917421-1201716035=:50557--