Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.152]) by air-db04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB044-86984d308503175; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:16:51 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5873F38000147; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:16:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PdnFh-0008MP-3x for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:15:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PdnFf-0008MG-4p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:15:51 +0000 Received: from nm14-vm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.247]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PdnFd-0000lR-8F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:15:51 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.69] by nm14.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 17:15:41 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.30] by tm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 17:15:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1030.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2011 17:15:41 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 242807.35491.bm@omp1030.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 15564 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2011 17:15:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1295025340; bh=N+O/l1kBvRe7e2d+cxwER4j2iGftsThZ9/tyjW4xoiI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QH/QbdTjiK0btZoO0TNkQjNUG2vnS/SG3YRUK4Ri7qfpfnZZlqIQW8IW6bo/lh/I2iZqBxjx/tv0j8OLf5aZfVM0BT4NeoC3QYNJZxpjlGIzisp+IiSmAXK3O08iXZ52XCNq3LBuPlNh9tqOru70O20QM3C6/6f/XXBreM9ciEg= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xp0pbsYPfhzDSVZkqGg2ZN0TV2rBkKW392ZMci6JxatIff3K1/NefLf18/jBsfqtqn63uVcu43wUq1Cv+AR6bpesiAJlevpkw7sTOy23G+Rs9Drh/ey0zuqNs/f0db5NcpVU1BT/A5NOTaHkV8Mm5t/o7NaZXB3KLMiN75Z365s=; Message-ID: <647472.13745.qm@web111916.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: u4WmL1wVM1lcSK7RYy0MNMqeR9VufimgK1y181cdysFFQ7. a5yUfQjOYYc4hHb5Yfh_Cp4SuRSxMsOtGbGpcagGaTtWNf3kUVTJdwBXZ5ei rJquwHUMVPx_9xqtYFuvwCsiLnv_WNclNKxo82pPGAcjqdL3OBnD9qgTTRzo FhynyM9JyQM8T.f4wVYJ7Cn6DCpXREgukMBgg0SuOnxiMSntoerpt9nx14Xd OJXLbMTAobW3640paViqGWk2du9Z._.Wy.YtV_glN_z_T7wfQD9Wn.VEbfkp I8E5FePMzaE271nR6XVd2dGZpXPs3DnzcJPxR345G1ff1SB_XUTLBbLMAmNT d0nNYB7mcrQ-- Received: from [151.99.187.181] by web111916.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:15:40 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/555 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <4D7062BE2D504CA4A55BDE1C7103CF31@gmc.net> <1295011560.4164.19.camel@pat-compaq-evo> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:15:40 -0800 (PST) From: Daniele Tincani To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1553211972-1295025340=:13745" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m248.2 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40984d30850220ef X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 --0-1553211972-1295025340=:13745 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello Roelof, what do you mean exactly by "difficult cases"? Regards Daniele ________________________________ From: Roelof Bakker To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 5:36:08 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna > Hi Roelof, > > Some interesting comments there. > > On the topic of feeder pick up Alan G3NYK and myself have had many > conversations over the years about ways to deal with the problem and a > method we've never got around to trying but I now have some components > to try (when I get a "roundtooit") is to convert (E/O) electrical to > optical at the feedpoint and then conduct by fibre through the noise > field converting back to demodulated baseband in the shack. The problem > of powering the feedpoint equipment may be overcome by using batteries > (possibly solar-charged) thus avoiding further noise pick up and > re-radiation from power source cabling. > > 73 Yes, this is an excellent idea and to be honest I have already acquired the necessary parts for some time, but have not come round yet to use them. An other idea that I have tested and can give excellent results in difficult cases is to use CAT5 network cable. I used rf-isolating transformers at both ends for the signal pair and common mode chokes at both ends for the pair carrying power to the antenna. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt --0-1553211972-1295025340=:13745 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Hello Roelof,
 
what do you mean exactly by "difficult cases"?
 
Regards
Daniele


From: Roelof Bakker <roelof@ndb.demon.nl>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 5:36:08 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna

> Hi Roelof,
>
> Some interesting comments there.
>
> On the topic of feeder pick up Alan G3NYK and myself have had many
> conversations over the years about ways to deal with the problem and a
> method we've never got around to trying but I now have some components
> to try (when I get a "roundtooit") is to convert (E/O) electrical to
> optical at the feedpoint and then conduct by fibre through the noise
> field converting back to demodulated baseband in the shack. The problem
> of powering the feedpoint equipment may be overcome by using batteries
> (possibly solar-charged) thus avoiding further noise pick up and
> re-radiation from power source cabling.
>
> 73

Yes, this is an excellent idea and to be honest I have already acquired the necessary parts for some time, but have not come round yet to use them. An other idea that I have tested and can give excellent results in difficult cases is to use CAT5 network cable.
I used rf-isolating transformers at both ends for the signal pair and common mode chokes at both ends for the pair carrying power to the antenna.

73,
Roelof, pa0rdt


--0-1553211972-1295025340=:13745--