Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.1.100 with SMTP id 4csp39145igl; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:56:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.14.149.2 with SMTP id w2mr41805289eej.126.1373558160247; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a48si3041481eep.263.2013.07.11.08.55.59 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UxIwn-0002KP-T4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:38:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UxIwn-0002KG-AB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:38:21 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UxIwk-0001UA-Rv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:38:20 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.31.68.35]) by mwinf5d23 with ME id z3eD1l00a0lfBvm033eEX8; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:38:17 +0200 Message-ID: <626B323FEA1248488C2ACB85F964AD31@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <51D975FA.60008@virginbroadband.com.au> <51DD1434.2030300@virginbroadband.com.au> <20130710173020.GA22574@cs.utwente.nl> <51DDADB2.5090905@aol.com> <51DDC00E.1000401@aol.com> <51DE7A0C.4030104@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <51DE7A0C.4030104@aol.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 16:38:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: It is only a 'lite' read as actually its not a viable configuration .. G.. From: pat Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 10:25 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: Graham Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money X-Scan-Signature: ba91b3da87b600e195a477da13512b8e Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0036_01CE7E55.09805B90" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1845 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01CE7E55.09805B90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It is only a 'lite' read as actually its not a viable = configuration .. G.. From: pat=20 Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 10:25 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Cc: Graham=20 Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna Thanks, Graham. Looks interesting, will have a proper read later. 73 On 10/07/13 21:41, Graham wrote: Or if you want a slightly lighter read , try this = http://www.google.com/patents/US4622558 =20 G ) From: pat=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:11 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Cc: Warren Ziegler=20 Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip antenna AND Warren, there are those who hold that the only place from which we = may observe our universe is from one of the other(s)! At this point in the narrative the little folk like me retreat deeply = into papers and books by the likes of Hawking and Penrose :>))) 73 On 10/07/13 20:06, Warren Ziegler wrote: Pat,=20 "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers = exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly = disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and = inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already = happened." -Douglas Adams On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:53 PM, pat wrote: Of course, it also holds to be true that the "rest of the = universe" that is the "other plate" of my capacitor is also the "other = plate" of everyone else's similar capacitor and is the common circuit = element to which we are all referenced! 73=20 On 10/07/13 18:30, Pieter-Tjerk de Boer wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:58:44PM +1000, edgar wrote: Surely every conductor in the unit will have a difference in = potential due to being in a electromagnetic field. Even in the legs of the FET. Although the potential will be = extremely small. Yes, of course that's correct. I should have written that with a fiber optic cable instead of = the coaxial cable, all circuit elements are coupled to the field at _almost_ = the same place, and thus are at _almost_ the same potential, and thus = _almost_ no signal will come out: very much less than with the coax still in = place. B.t.w., some mini-whips are built using a metal can as the = probe, with the entire electronics inside the can; such an arrangement would = get quite close to zero output when the coax is replaced by the = fiber optics. Anyway, it was originally claimed that the functioning of the = mini-whip does not depend on the coaxial cable; I just intended to explain = why I think it does. 73, Pieter-Tjerk, PA3FWM --=20 73 de pat g4gvw es gd dx qth nr Felixstowe East Coast UK --=20 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ=20 WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 =20 --=20 73 de pat g4gvw es gd dx qth nr Felixstowe East Coast UK --=20 73 de pat g4gvw es gd dx qth nr Felixstowe East Coast UK ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01CE7E55.09805B90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It is  only  a  'lite'   read  = as =20 actually  its   not    a  = viable  =20 configuration  ..
 
G..

From: pat
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 10:25 AM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Cc: Graham
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip=20 antenna

Thanks, Graham. Looks interesting, will = have a proper=20 read later.

73



On 10/07/13 21:41, Graham = wrote:
Or if you  want a  slightly   lighter =  =20 read  , try  this      http://www.google.com/patents/US4622558 = ;  
 
G  )
 
From: pat
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:11 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Cc: Warren = Ziegler=20
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: LF: VK1OD's analysis of the MiniWhip = antenna

AND Warren, there are those who hold that = the only=20 place from which we may observe our universe is from one of the=20 other(s)!

At this point in the narrative the little folk like = me=20 retreat deeply into papers and books by the likes of Hawking and = Penrose=20 :>)))

73


On 10/07/13 20:06, Warren Ziegler=20 wrote:
Pat,=20
   "There is=20 a theory which states that if ever = anyone=20 discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is = here, it will=20 instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre = and=20 inexplicable. There is=20 another theory which states that this has already = happened."
-Douglas=20 Adams


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:53 PM, pat <g4gvw@aol.com> wrote:
Of course, it also holds to be true that the = "rest of=20 the universe" that is the "other plate" of my capacitor is also = the "other=20 plate" of everyone else's similar capacitor and is the common = circuit=20 element to which we are all referenced!

73=20



On 10/07/13 18:30, Pieter-Tjerk de Boer = wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:58:44PM +1000, = edgar=20 wrote:

Surely every conductor in the unit will have = a=20 difference in potential
due to being in a electromagnetic=20 field.
Even in the legs of the FET. Although the potential = will be=20 extremely small.
Yes, of course that's = correct.

I=20 should have written that with a fiber optic cable instead of the = coaxial
cable, all circuit elements are coupled to the field = at=20 _almost_ the same
place, and thus are at _almost_ the same = potential,=20 and thus _almost_ no
signal will come out: very much less = than with=20 the coax still in place.

B.t.w., some mini-whips are = built using=20 a metal can as the probe, with
the entire electronics inside = the can;=20 such an arrangement would get
quite close to zero output when = the=20 coax is replaced by the fiber optics.

Anyway, it was = originally=20 claimed that the functioning of the mini-whip
does not depend = on the=20 coaxial cable; I just intended to explain why I
think it=20 does.

73, Pieter-Tjerk,=20 PA3FWM




--
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr = Felixstowe
East Coast=20 UK





--
73 Warren K2ORS
        =  =20       WD2XGJ
          =  =20     WD2XSH/23
            =  =20   WE2XEB/2
              =  =20 WE2XGR/1

  

--=20
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK


--=20
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK
------=_NextPart_000_0036_01CE7E55.09805B90--