Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 390673800008A; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:44:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T8Ism-0002Z7-Ro for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:43:08 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T8Ism-0002Yy-ES for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:43:08 +0100 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Isk-0003hj-ER for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:43:07 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.21.75]) by mwinf5d30 with ME id uNj51j0021dBpUa03Nj57L; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:43:05 +0200 Message-ID: <615B2E2B99844240986CD30EF0046CB8@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <000001cd8810$7b23f220$716bd660$@com> <002d01cd8853$3f197af0$bd4c70d0$@com> <68C1B4735C85472DA442B70F4963742A@AGB> <000001cd88d1$4ce8a5b0$e6b9f110$@com> <2EF53A3E645341B3BD7233250660338E@AGB> In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:43:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes , Thanks to those who tuned in for you ! As usual no decodes at this qth , but this time the reason is not quite as obvious in the past as the local noise level has dropped, if g3xdv is running later , Im sure you will decode , [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4acf5043e13b293f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Yes , Thanks to those who tuned in for you ! As usual no decodes at this qth , but this time the reason is not quite as obvious in the past as the local noise level has dropped, if g3xdv is running later , Im sure you will decode , Well for Opera tx/rx , stability requirements are only +/- 1 hz over the 32 mins , but its possible that higher stability will lower the min s/n level but only fractionally, the system is designed to use 'normal' radio equipment ! Frequency setting accuracy is also not a problem as long as the signal falls inside the 100 Hz pass band , may be 1 hz clear each side is enough for a decode ! These represent the minimum decode level for OP32 > 23:59 136 VO1NA de F4DTL Op32 -40 dB in Paris France > 23:59 136 VO1NA de W1TAG Op32 -41 dB in Raymond, ME Terry's 01:39 136 VO1NA Op32 -25 dB is some 15 dB over the level , so what ever the power was , its was eventually 15 dB in hand ! 73 All - G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 11:12 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA > Dear Group, > > Thank-you to all who provided reports: GW0EZY, F1DTL, W1TAG, G4WGT > and DF6NM to whom I apologise for not having phase coherent keying! > I will give this some thought, along with Grahams suggestion to > try the pencil method of lowering the QRG. Perhaps it might be best to > keep searching for a caesium standard to use with a synthesiser. > > The present reference is an OCXO at 13.7770 MHz which was last calibrated > against the LORAN sidebands. > > Some RX antenna work was completed today so the RX will be on for OPERA32 > on 136.00 kHz. > > 73 and thanks again. > > Joe VO1NA > > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >