Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1102; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t9UH6PVa009841 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:06:25 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ZsD0g-0007wF-4h for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:58:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ZsD0f-0007w6-SL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:58:37 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsCzd-0007Gt-WA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:58:36 +0000 Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.237.142.13]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LgptO-1aEbpz2T9a-00oDLa for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:57:17 +0100 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <1887849276.20151030143118@chriswilson.tv> In-Reply-To: <1887849276.20151030143118@chriswilson.tv> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:57:16 +0100 Message-ID: <60A592FADEF748EFA1471925D327EF0C@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AdETIAq1veNB070UQheNYL3un9h3ZAAE1GzA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:MvvxKV4pvWZxgEA0IGG68dufEjE9WBnH4kigLsgIfwy+ygwPuSr YZfPbdPvuvVLk8YYysbdT+TJDJitW79BXPs80vUgYieyAu3POUgUME9zlqf0U8zKIdmVvsD /5lfiEgE83N4ngxqy/e31scSc4L4E3sLip5Yx99DGzGrabyuqtAeDkR3WiFsJtHEzBDyx1r gssuCdksSRQGgZgNbNjug== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:lYn4EvJA+QE=:4e7muyBi6sFo8p8TXxlUIE Nq1jDEzwFm2lmbDjLBCN/qdkY4UGEzDgOx8MskD/JwOFlPaCZbq7HJMVpVS/dDn5zNQjAzzOs G6ywKHPEyEzGUcCrM+U7C5HPfUkKbKvd5sE6avpB5omDP56Mz6p8zkXvFQqkPRPuHOo7Kg0nE M5fsCQ1XZNnXYBnBjKbTVMF4SDWVSgj84gUEvmJHrj8ANFCnRpJoRtygDjDT0K72lu7GwzN6Y HeBFutC9KfqFya8wtK/TebVYQXNn8fi36IQDNgUde1r7hU/XGFVHImCZOxZPcf7IaB4DYmmiT oAWxX7gYMTt/UB1JX5NAu7EchMMTpTNMEE7S+5ju9xtwDgS2/TtoVyXIJu5SXMfnNc9MRaMeq tMLKSXaZ/+oflaskacC/EA/CF3MOhlcdTJ0nu9RnWH1hgQrbaC+mvdjNrWHW3az74StmBroW3 wXLuEIiyruSo6nVRFQrNlBB+vWvhALHEqgvKLO+fDaCfitX8cUxS2fpb3sHWifxBaDpd00yoC PLSmehf3O8U1maiPG3/OZIWscEbONA7ylTliUDtJWBnNJp5GCSlpSb4FZz2jzpl4tTdCFWzvl O0RLRSP2hrtSKSxVyDrjPpSS7/DJ6JOON3GdzGP5hTXTBsuhHGP9OyW24JBTlYLLPYKytzvC1 oUB0Eb9TuSG6CZl7YxlY7Md7VJj13XjbQ16gzIWm8yA4sbujL0AeZ2vkpiWpPjP4Ag53/af6T GbGk8jSRR38ucGBHca7QDvXjgSttaGMFa+RrCJGVjkxoFF6L2be7K4mKQFaK9kWrZu6GlL4Lw e5VQm08 X-Scan-Signature: 6ffbd2c9950b634d6cc91f9565b01a8b Subject: LF: RE: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4696 Chris, the point is that your Zmag is identical with Rs,i.e.no reactance (Xs =zero),hence resonance. Virtually perfect match,see Rik's calculations. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Chris Wilson >Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 3:31 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: LF: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better? > >30 October 2015 > > >I now have my loading coil running without a matching transformer, as >I have very slightly improved my ground. I get a Zmag of 45.6 Ohms, is >it worth worrying about? Thanks, a scan is at: > > >http://www.chriswilson.tv/30-10-2015.jpg > > > >-- > > >Best regards, > Chris mailto:chris@chriswilson.tv > >