Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.57.9 with SMTP id e9csp117637igq; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:40:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.4.164 with SMTP id l4mr14424206lbl.94.1372790422001; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j10si7273909laj.128.2013.07.02.11.40.21 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Uu5Tv-0005tK-GP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:39:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Uu5Tv-0005tB-2e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:39:15 +0100 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.14]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Uu5Tp-0007GF-V7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:39:13 +0100 Received: from cpsps-ews12.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.179]) by cpsmtpb-ews09.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:39:09 +0200 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.5]) by cpsps-ews12.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:39:09 +0200 Received: from Extensa ([195.241.183.120]) by CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:39:09 +0200 Message-ID: <6083F1823A66417B9E29F6BB03EB7763@Extensa> From: "PA1SDB, Peter" To: References: <000001ce766b$877f2cc0$0702a8c0@acer> <51D1AC13.6020602@psk31.plus.com> <002101ce76f8$b8692ab0$0702a8c0@acer> <51D291D0.3040405@psk31.plus.com> <001b01ce7707$7fe40750$0702a8c0@acer> <51D2AA26.1000605@psk31.plus.com> <000801ce771e$42cd2d30$0702a8c0@acer> <51D2D94A.7040906@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <51D2D94A.7040906@psk31.plus.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 18:39:08 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jul 2013 18:39:09.0127 (UTC) FILETIME=[705A2570:01CE7753] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Seems that this noise problem was not something local here. It has nothing to do with that school here at the corner. If I understand well, the noise level today was lower as usual all over europe. 73, Peter. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.14 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 4d97240a623a26620214cd27feaa9f71 Subject: Re: LF: 8270 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_11DB_01CE7753.6FEE4440" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2051 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_11DB_01CE7753.6FEE4440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Seems that this noise problem was not something local here. It has nothing to do with that school here at the corner. If I understand well, the noise level today was lower as usual all over europe. 73, Peter. ----- Original Message ----- From: g3zjo To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 1:44 PM Subject: Re: LF: 8270 On 02/07/2013 13:18, henny wrote: i think my signal is on Your grabber, Yes a good signal Henny, from Peter's comments too it seems that today is good for some reason. 73 Eddie ------=_NextPart_000_11DB_01CE7753.6FEE4440 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Seems that this noise problem was not = something local=20 here.
It has nothing to do with that school here at = the=20 corner.
If I understand well, the noise level=20 today was lower as usual all over europe.
 
73, Peter.
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 g3zjo=20
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 = 1:44=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 8270

On 02/07/2013 13:18, henny wrote:=20
i think my signal is on Your = grabber,
Yes=20 a good signal Henny, from Peter's comments too it seems that today is = good for=20 some reason.

73 Eddie
------=_NextPart_000_11DB_01CE7753.6FEE4440--