Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp66368igc; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 15:23:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.95.105 with SMTP id dj9mr28962125wib.22.1389309826203; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:23:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dc7si3516695wib.78.2014.01.09.15.23.45 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:23:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@btinternet.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W1OUY-0002fw-3e for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:54:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W1OUX-0002fn-K7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:54:21 +0000 Received: from smtpout04.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.124]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W1OUV-0004y1-79 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:54:20 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090202.52CF2899.00C9,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=12/97,refid=2.7.2:2014.1.7.181517:17:12.455,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODY_SIZE_600_699, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __PHISH_FROM, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from gnat (86.178.171.105) by smtpout04.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.99.10223) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 52C568140067CE40 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 22:54:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1389308059; bh=s3gTMv6ixhOVnu1CUzcKNoCQBblna0PSCzFp+4aLGbQ=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer; b=n/TRZ6ZCQ/jrV9JySpwBx9E4HW1eAgz4k5qR2sfomfrURgLlclIk7Lu6jBtWuhDjFvF2DFf+xl8Gc93J8wDHH84GAtfJPaIlqUQDBbQ4RO48hMHmgJzbz7Ra9SKt0PeAFUWVr9ZTRE7qBCUr+F/ETGfXxkPAevtVBdnhP4FSlno= Message-ID: <5D8410C3B9D14319B3EC19CDAD801400@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <096501cf0d21$0ca31550$25e93ff0$@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 22:21:59 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jim I'd have to think about that it is a very long path....its possible too much of the path is in darkness, so the effect at the terminator is washed out ?? Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "hvanesce" To: Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 9:55 AM Subject: LF: VLF Terminator Phase Bumps [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.20.0.124 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e09cca6d8e44a91eadbdfb3e1b8aec09 Subject: LF: Re: VLF Terminator Phase Bumps Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Jim I'd have to think about that it is a very long path....its possible too much of the path is in darkness, so the effect at the terminator is washed out ?? Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "hvanesce" To: Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 9:55 AM Subject: LF: VLF Terminator Phase Bumps > Alan, > > I took a quick look for some examples of VLF terminator bumps (not > prevalent > in a random sample) and the first one I found was NPM - Farnborough (from > Hampton - 1964); note some qualitative and quantitative similarities with > Paul's measured phase values. > > 73, Jim AA5BW >