Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x5REr5gg011044 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:53:06 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hgVhK-0000Ee-Mr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:48:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hgVhJ-0000EV-Gv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:48:25 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hgVhG-0003fC-US for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:48:24 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA0902400E6 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:48:21 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1561646901; bh=uVzddVeFf1dsVy1hI+GONOndm85PBnSDipY+0b4cs2g=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=UoAC2yjotf/ffn4fA12opWvVDRdC1tQZg5nbkbiN7nPBpyu/S6n9FKot799g1+YRg fqu7jkYv49/mrRofy5kUllTpwo9TqojbEM0EA66yz6PLNVxtgkCsHRh2hIBQhpgPzP j68kZTSO34ljhi6PejLZRPkDrFxW3gnA+pZyryRB4OXZY+bLeqpCYkbjBXaPMPLjXT ZWTTHbgjRE2O/d6UiUig2hAF8+7MwPYNElDs4DbgKOquXq/dEUdE/52POTpDLGEp1M Dr2QDiPKbGOfIwNKS9JP4IfHabyxMasjDkkncarkedNQ8ijipQZmNRK5c3pU0K6RUg b/C5Aw9L3ESsA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 45ZN7873kHz9rxR for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:48:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5D14D734.3030602@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:48:20 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <16b9872d87c.marcocadeddu@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <16b9872d87c.marcocadeddu@tin.it> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Marco, Yes you are right. But maybe this is a sign! Someone should buy one and start experimenting, then it would be a funny start of the story. Will you? ;-) I'm busy with my wires on the ground... Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.0 DKIMWL_WL_MED DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted Medium sender X-Scan-Signature: 11963a33d604c33786d8f1de94ce267f Subject: Re: R: Re: ULF/VLF: amateur stair case / carrier transmissions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Marco, Yes you are right. But maybe this is a sign! Someone should buy one and start experimenting, then it would be a funny start of the story. Will you? ;-) I'm busy with my wires on the ground... BTW there was an unannounced transmission of SAQ today. I'm right now producing a wav file from the N-S loop (heavy QRN from the east today) to listen for it... 73, Stefan Am 27.06.2019 12:19, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it: > ehm... Roman > Stefan just mistyped drone instead of done ;-) > 73 Marco IK1HSS > > ----Messaggio originale---- > Da: rw3adb@YANDEX.ru > Data: 27-giu-2019 11.50 > A: > Ogg: Re: ULF/VLF: amateur stair case / carrier transmissions > > Gut Abend Genosse Funkamateur Stefan! > > Do not understood exactly - whats model of drone? Quadrocopter? > 20 min so little time, of course. > We are discuss about transmit power for copter by wires from the > ground, not batteries. > > 73! > Roman > > > Hello Genosse Funkamateur Roman, > > > > I'm sorry, the 'drone' was just a typo. I simply meant 'done' instead. > > > > 73,Stefan > > > > Am 26.06.2019 10:58, schrieb Roman: > > > >> Guten morgen Genosse Funkamateur Stefan! > >> > >> Congrats with your success! > >> > >> Let us to know more details about drone antenna? > >> We are discuss about that way in 2011 on 136.su forum. > >> Very interesting! > >> > >> 73! > >> Roman > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Today, some 20 minute long carrier transmissions were drone from > JN39WI > >>> again. The main intention was to calibrate my local RDF spectrogram > >>> (still to be done) in the range below 16.4 kHz (JXN) and above 82 Hz > >>> (ZEVS). So that was a amateur radio ULF/VLF staircase somehow, despite > >>> the weak signal strength relative to commercial transmitters. > >>> > >>> It was a hot day! Far> 30 C here. I started early in the morning and > >>> enjoyed the fresh air in the forest. > >>> > >>> The DC resistance of the 1130m ground loop increased to 73.2 Ohm > >>> (measured at 1 A) due to the dry soil. It confirms the dependency > shown > >>> in the last year! In 2018 i saw the resistance rising up to 94 Ohm in > >>> late October, then it dropped to 57 Ohm (-40 %) in just 2 months. > >>> > >>> It was interesting to see that the antenna current is much higher at > >>> lower frequencies (always at resonance | the PA output voltage is > nearly > >>> constant). This effect was very clearly expressed. > >>> > >>> IF of interest for other stations (having a data storage): > >>> > >>> Frequency/Hz Start time/UTC Antenna current/A > >>> 970.005 2019-06-25_08:36:20,+20m 2.26 > >>> 2970.005 2019-06-25_08:13:30,+20m 2.19 > >>> 5170.005 2019-06-25_07:51:00,+20m 2.09 > >>> 8270.005 2019-06-25_07:23:00,+25m 1.85 > >>> end of the official part. > >>> > >>> BTW, since a few days, the VLF RX site at DL0AO has a 3 axis VLF > >>> receiver recording data from a Octo-soundcard and a Raspberry pi 3, > >>> saving data to a 4 TB HDD so there is one more station that won't miss > >>> anything from now on (for example unannounced transmissions by SAQ). > >>> > >>> Some spectrograms may be shown later. > >>> > >>> Evetually there was a problem with the sample rate correction due > to the > >>> upheating car, which caused a high deviation of the tracked sample > rate. > >>> The max allowed range of 10 ppm was left in the end of the experiment > >>> but this was noticed a bit late, maybe. > >>> > >>> 73, Stefan > -- > 73! > Roman, RW3ADB > > >