Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x49Dh3Eb023541 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:43:04 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1hOjCk-0002mA-Sj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 14:35:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1hOjCW-0002m1-6e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 14:35:08 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hOjCO-0006a7-UF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 14:35:01 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B9512400E5 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:34:59 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1557408899; bh=mibOg3JKIPpRe53SgNCZZ+WY0pdN0GZZ44rjlQIySFg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=W4uxdTTH09ryRFK2zJApX7+7KdgOTaDQJZSGBDpfNMGmuuvJ+Zm75eNb4e+37EWyY +8e7fWwpudOKW7xmdVFauRfnfvzbucv8MsRPuTOFNCqXamHodzzA+gytOcwc/Hqa48 BTv7SG7kszQ2k2XkOJEW6Mi6mg+jCq41LcYk87drTTzeGM7hA2D4FbvMNkFvK9TXhS FTIkP7mntglmpHppzCGk+BIjubE75CDzpb/dWkaG2kY1RE/iD9Qjf7SshVwBhVAmu+ iuYF5w6EhsRXQBAeB++Im1IGMobSE3boVj7PyQpW+PtcF2C18XJ8WZpP6+gADMlNwP 12a75BGLdY7Eg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 450Dq708dYz9rxM for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:34:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5CD42C82.80906@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 15:34:58 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <477297345.20190414143742@gmail.com> <5CB35457.9060303@posteo.de> <592014641.20190414170848@gmail.com> <5CB37097.90104@posteo.de> <853391954.20190509134230@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <853391954.20190509134230@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Chris, I would not recommend the one you selected because it has an unnecessary large inner diameter and a lower height, thus a lower AL value. I think this is the same one that i recommended from Bürklin: https://www.mouser.co.uk/ProductDetail/EPCOS-TDK/B64290A0699X830?qs=sGAEpiMZZMs2JV%252BnT%2FvX8Df1W1GtRs010YpcsJh6dvk%3D It is also cheape [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.0 DKIMWL_WL_MED DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted Medium sender X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: Re: LF: Another impedance matching question. Paul's audio amps. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Chris, I would not recommend the one you selected because it has an unnecessary large inner diameter and a lower height, thus a lower AL value. I think this is the same one that i recommended from Bürklin: https://www.mouser.co.uk/ProductDetail/EPCOS-TDK/B64290A0699X830?qs=sGAEpiMZZMs2JV%252BnT%2FvX8Df1W1GtRs010YpcsJh6dvk%3D It is also cheaper. There are other materials available, such as T65, T38, T37, offering a higher AL value. Maybe these are even more suitable at that sort of frequency but i didn't spend too much time to select the best core for each frequency. I use the N30 material from 1 kHz to MF at high power ( > 1 kW for one core) without problems. So this is what i recommend. It will work. 73, Stefan PS: If you want to bridge one of Paul's 2x 7.2 kW amps, you may need two of them ;-) PPS: You may want to build two orthogonal ground loops then, one per channel. With SpecLab you can then drive each channel separately and so you can build a software rotatable loop by aligning the phase between the channels, while staying into the shack when its cold and/or rainy :-) Am 09.05.2019 14:42, schrieb Chris Wilson: > > Hello Stefan, > > I am now on to building a matching transformer but it seems Buerklin > have a minimum order of 60 units! I have found this bigger core at > Mouser, could I use that instead please? > > https://www.mouser.co.uk/ProductDetail/EPCOS-TDK/B64290L0730X830?qs=4l9S5vBWkUJtsO6ZFRCS4g%3D%3D >