Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x22JXOLn003311 for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 20:33:31 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1h0AIq-0003Ez-M2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 19:28:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1h0AIk-0003Eq-Ct for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 19:28:02 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1h0AIi-0003To-M2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 19:28:01 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 962022400E5 for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 20:27:59 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1551554879; bh=K8sYD48Qp7rauBPc47Yhc9adnsFAwsy232CMwtLeBz8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Snd0t0VEjx7eUnukhEpsH6LKAdQpcgOf1/uAngkIC4vwqa3av1AdNhr12/l5OmE0b drQsYX22sxl0aun5rwuS31wHjm7rFFYNrg62IHCQgl1CVZKWEMd6s+aPWUHk7gLFEA rq9Og8TKst0qPuaCn7B/f0OltxbnDu0klVcipd46juGO3SXZZ8fGE89BeqsGw/66I2 izvgIUfBwVGzBeX7ACQZCAZVR/IAIitwfu8q/yzZ9LQOZx1ZXNgj/UBbFLE/9kZTOU ND7IuvXZqy34xygo8jGTARpwwHaa6RzGKJDHN/cXFxjNhXpRFcEPwssp48YpEriauQ 90T/64J1HhMFg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 44Bbsq0Dltz9rxK for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 20:27:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C7AD93E.8010402@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 20:27:58 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jacek, I've tried a lot of antenna mixing but did not get better spectrum peaks that 10.5 dB SNR, so it is quite weak. Best decoder result was 'AV' at rank 70. I'm waiting for your detailed description of the experiment. What antenna and power was used? How did you generate signal? Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: URI host has a public dotted-decimal IPv4 address X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: Re: LF: VLF ebnaut transmission from Poland Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Jacek, I've tried a lot of antenna mixing but did not get better spectrum peaks that 10.5 dB SNR, so it is quite weak. Best decoder result was 'AV' at rank 70. I'm waiting for your detailed description of the experiment. What antenna and power was used? How did you generate signal? 73, Stefan Am 02.03.2019 19:04, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski: > BTW we've also sent a carrier at 8270.005 Hz from 11:30 to 4:00 UTC. > This can be seen on Paul's excellent grabber: > > http://78.46.38.217/fbins3.html#p=1551513600&b=080&s=fd&m=cardioid&w=r&h=62&z1=0.34&z2=0.64&c=1&mb=615,147,688,173,1 > > > > And another at 8270.00073Hz since the transmission end around 5:30 UTC > for probably 1-2 hours (don't know how long exactly because i fell > asleep). Unfortunately i can't see this on Paul's grabber. > > VY 73 from > > Marcin/SQ2BXI , Julian, and Jacek/SQ5BPF > > >