Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id x0UFB6Wo030118 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:11:07 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gorRW-0001Hj-Qn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:06:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gorRV-0001Ha-Tt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:06:21 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gorRT-00026S-OK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:06:20 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EF712400FB for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:06:18 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1548860778; bh=P/5pAppc1Ti3+17ihqzBg/S2arZVTba3RY4Nqg38KIw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=EbgLqDViSdYit2ElPdwo1D37XTImfJQ7IfIRBhjRZI9r3w17qM8a+kWN9uzZ8plNC 5rrf8JimINhrOdmTZHLMZYWtnr3cA/RtcA9fsLxpEbGSZ9yJUZsH89OATYYphUrkvy M7SzQN0YQGvgd/kHi7dGxLT/8HOGgB+cxi+EkeQ7TD86PtZRGRLsVROhHJGHwTnolp bRacbej9hnqJccHrWrRCgBzhS+ohQ/WcxgceZ1XZpgFK+7OBjxHCinhF26EOR33yn3 ZZmWQjg+ow/B/es9/QrcjZ6TuDS2kYpv4Zk0Kl4xBrI5Mc3q7umtDqsEH+y5OW1xvK B1JY/fFX3AsDQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43qRX96Qr1z9rxL for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:06:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C51BD69.7090004@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:06:17 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7e1ee234-21b9-d8b1-f0e1-e2eace39a968@usa.net> <71d8e1d2-69cb-4ecb-0205-028cb5a81ff9@usa.net> <270E8BB04B204DDBBF0B786FE7615E34@malcoHP> <5C51BB99.8060206@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5C51BB99.8060206@posteo.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: PS: Why are these people writing to this group (blacksheep) at all, if they don't like it? And how do they know that the 'main group' has migrated, apart from the fact that this is just a snapshot observa [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 80dfd4418e586cee7526d670ae10acbc Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] SMT PA0RDT Board Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020403080906050701090804" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020403080906050701090804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit PS: Why are these people writing to this group (blacksheep) at all, if they don't like it? And how do they know that the 'main group' has migrated, apart from the fact that this is just a snapshot observation which can totally change within weeks. I remember several people coming back from yahoo to blacksheep after some moths, and unsubscribed at yahoo again. For what?? Am 30.01.2019 15:58, schrieb DK7FC: > Mal, > > why are you subscribed to that .io list at all? I don't care about it > completely. It is simply not existing. Tomorrow it will be groups.to > and then lists.li and then mail.vt, of course always with new features > and advantages. Each few years the same story. It is so boring!!! > > My car becomes 30 years old in a few weeks and i still like it as in > the first week (i bought it 16 years ago, for just 800 EUR). People > told me that it would be better to change it to a NEWer version, think > of all the advantages, oh and the SAFETY!!! ;-) And then the > advertisement. More, better, faster, efficient... uuuh. > > You know, there are those people who somehow like to shutdown > blacksheep. Why do they have that motivation? I observed the effect in > 2012, when the super-yahoo advanced group came up. It wasn't enough > for them to move to the other group, which is their free decision of > course. Why aren't they just happy with all the new advantages? What > is going on into their minds that they feel motivated to destroy the > group which other people still like? Coexistence unwanted? > Simple-minded, indeed. But dangerous. > > 73, Stefan > > > > > > > Am 30.01.2019 15:25, schrieb mal hamilton: >> BLACKSHEEP has stood the test of TIME, others have been and gone. >> People use Blacksheep because it is reliable and has been going for >> over 20 years. >> How long will groups.ie last ? Some people like Choice >> G3KEV >> *From:* Alberto di Bene >> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:44 PM >> *To:* rsgb-lf-group@groups.io >> *Subject:* Re: [rsgb-lf-group] SMT PA0RDT Board >> On 2019-01-29 18:12, Andy TALBOT wrote: >>> Pity the Blacksheep only subscribers can't get at it :-) >> >> I don't understand why the group duplication still exists... when the >> group was hosted by Yahoo, all the Yahoo-haters had a valid reason to >> refuge themselves in the reassuring wool of a black sheep... but now >> that the main group has migrated to groups.io, frankly I don't see >> the reason why the blacksheep list should continue to exist... but I >> am a simple-minded person, maybe those reasons are escaping my >> understanding... :-) >> >> 73 Alberto I2PHD >> >> >> _._,_._,_ >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Groups.io Links: >> >> You receive all messages sent to this group. >> >> View/Reply Online (#8542) >> | Reply To Group >> >> | Reply To Sender >> >> | Mute This Topic | New Topic >> >> >> Your Subscription >> | Contact Group Owner | >> Unsubscribe >> >> [g3kevmal@talktalk.net] >> >> _._,_._,_ --------------020403080906050701090804 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit PS:

Why are these people writing to this group (blacksheep) at all, if they don't like it?
And how do they know that the 'main group' has migrated, apart from the fact that this is just a snapshot observation which can totally change within weeks. I remember several people coming back from yahoo to blacksheep after some moths, and unsubscribed at yahoo again.

For what??


Am 30.01.2019 15:58, schrieb DK7FC:
Mal,

why are you subscribed to that .io list at all? I don't care about it completely. It is simply not existing. Tomorrow it will be groups.to and then lists.li and then mail.vt, of course always with new features and advantages. Each few years the same story. It is so boring!!!

My car becomes 30 years old in a few weeks and i still like it as in the first week (i bought it 16 years ago, for just 800 EUR). People told me that it would be better to change it to a NEWer version, think of all the advantages, oh and the SAFETY!!! ;-) And then the advertisement. More, better, faster, efficient... uuuh.

You know, there are those people who somehow like to shutdown blacksheep. Why do they have that motivation? I observed the effect in 2012, when the super-yahoo advanced group came up. It wasn't enough for them to move to the other group, which is their free decision of course. Why aren't they just happy with all the new advantages? What is going on into their minds that they feel motivated to destroy the group which other people still like? Coexistence unwanted? Simple-minded, indeed. But dangerous.

73, Stefan






Am 30.01.2019 15:25, schrieb mal hamilton:
BLACKSHEEP has stood the test of TIME, others have been and gone. People use Blacksheep because it is reliable and has been going for over 20 years.
How long will groups.ie last ? Some people like Choice
G3KEV
 
 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] SMT PA0RDT Board
 
On 2019-01-29 18:12, Andy TALBOT wrote:
Pity the Blacksheep only subscribers can't get at it :-)

I don't understand why the group duplication still exists... when the group was hosted by Yahoo, all the Yahoo-haters had a valid reason to refuge themselves in the reassuring wool of a black sheep... but now that the main group has migrated to groups.io, frankly I don't see the reason why the blacksheep list should continue to exist... but I am a simple-minded person, maybe those reasons are escaping my understanding... :-)

73  Alberto  I2PHD

 
_._,_._,_
Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#8542) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic

Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [g3kevmal@talktalk.net]

_._,_._,_
--------------020403080906050701090804--