Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wBJMWvuB013881 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:32:58 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gZkGx-0001CI-Gg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 22:24:59 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gZkGn-0001C9-D4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 22:24:49 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gZkGj-0006je-GC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 22:24:46 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FBEC2400E5 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:24:42 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1545258282; bh=Jq5ZjCw+0a7WKoK0RsG4+oBKOXHWDWdkOUxgD7KuR3M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=EYAuxHzFwjs92cf1hq0xfgBV4gFNqKe7G+Qpx0RZZINZMvAmOQYLxiekni4y73JOO 2ybCxsr6xGsutnte55tkNMgKZ50qwbUTQ4wOvoI/9oDyR7pLHCMZG/JNHC3zjIOk7N J6B2rUQbCerFD09PUzjDkeNi0jZV6oJY4iLJrWYsmLsI2QfkmyhjQ7ZyM+rvIP2v+R SwRzmYH1hb+PuinikNEcjFm9AHjQvooMQr0G53IRpwKRucIibbJy+53JbFZnQM9wqt 4T26p/3ERYwS3HDdw9qb8Ew5+NNerBb/81/b/NFByB6fDl9+lqp7CTSvlnCfVvFMcf e+kd4G0g/3zOw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43KqFP6L8Vz9rxK for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:24:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C1AC529.3070607@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:24:41 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <10f465fa-37f0-4ac6-b53d-793f955ea011@email.android.com> <5C19FFCB.1060305@posteo.de> <16876196-3308-f722-dfca-5232150e7394@n1bug.com> <5C1A3F32.9070604@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, Am 19.12.2018 18:57, schrieb N1BUG: > Hi Stefan, > > Thanks for showing us your TX converter circuit. That is a bit more > complicated than I was expecting which goes to illustrate my point > about wh [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: Ebnaut receiver frequency stability qustion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, Am 19.12.2018 18:57, schrieb N1BUG: > Hi Stefan, > > Thanks for showing us your TX converter circuit. That is a bit more > complicated than I was expecting which goes to illustrate my point > about why diagrams are so important. I thought you meant to use a > simple DBM mixer with a LO. I see I was wrong about that. > Yes but there you don't need to build high Q band filters. It is just some Rs and Cs and logic ICs... > I can build this. But how do we connect the Ublox LO? I don't know yet how the output voltage of the modele looks. Is it 3.3 V or 5 V? Maybe some kind of buffer will be needed. > Remove the > 74HC4060 and connect the Ublox to the 74HC4052 CLK pins through a > capacitor? > The Ublox would be connected to the 500 kHz input of the 74HC74. Not through a capacitor, i would connect it directly. > Do the capacitors in the circuit need to be any special type? It > seems some of them might need to be quite stable? > I took normal ceramic Cs and foil Cs, just what i found from the junk box. 73, Stefan