Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wBBLpXrF016075 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:51:34 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gWprp-0004Wz-OR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:47:01 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gWpro-0004Wq-9F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:47:00 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gWprm-0001V6-7V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:46:58 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 133B416005E for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:46:56 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1544564817; bh=t0d32dQJ0MEIwq/u7K1m+74pzdRhBdyQmM03Z9Cx5GQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=YWmE5Z/Aev+Sl+k6myMk75wh2jdArivF8XBAzRMHiPr2j8RrCcaDvVNH1ZFkiCUhr a0wQmjPcLasrZrD0euhRBYZZ4gFNSUDiEm8bWAUfH5WNkFRYJ11kXRr+p4u5bjPBl/ T3VQEN7BRp7aQBtwKMcNG2uFT5gnBkR+SAGWaq6Yi4RgETctvCFzjHUZuC0Lg6Nj1L sIdpu8n1ChMw/ZcdCpb4srfiVdDlAeGOTZ1g6TXUCSGRZi1zCbXbO43i0NHbrq6qsz qJB8ciLIVePCxLzmftcUarQ3EpBVirW+xmXpANWXw3ykVKSwt1rJioqgvn2Wwgu4H+ UVhBOVNJXDqRA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 43DtnX3Nl6z6tmG for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:46:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C10304F.40509@posteo.de> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:46:55 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <719851106.2631422.1544562473988.ref@mail.yahoo.com>,<719851106.2631422.1544562473988@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Markus and Geoff, Markus, thanks for the decode and feedback. How do you explain the minor phase instability in your phase plot? Is it propagation? Geoff, thanks for trying. The 2nd message is completed already. S/N should be fine for a decode :-) Are you also new on this reflector? It is nice to see new OMs always and always again :-) I know you [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 9af9bda535a078107136d2385fe00312 Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut LF message announcement Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060501050404050501040306" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060501050404050501040306 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Markus and Geoff, Markus, thanks for the decode and feedback. How do you explain the minor phase instability in your phase plot? Is it propagation? Geoff, thanks for trying. The 2nd message is completed already. S/N should be fine for a decode :-) Are you also new on this reflector? It is nice to see new OMs always and always again :-) I know your call from theWSPR map on LF. Your RX and location must be very good for LFreception! Which method do you use for getting EbNaut decodes, i.e. what isyour (extended) rig? 73, Stefan Am 11.12.2018 22:29, schrieb Geoff Hughes: > Stefan, > > A good signal here also - however I have been unable so far to produce > a recording which will produce a successful decode. I will keep > attempting. > > 73 Geoff G0LUJ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > on behalf of Markus Vester > > *Sent:* 11 December 2018 21:07 > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: EbNaut LF message announcement > > Hi Stefan, > > a booming signal here, as usual. Interestingly, simultaneous decoding > of VO1NA is pretty much undisturbed, even though ebnaut-rx claims > -14.1 dB carrier-based Eb/N0 due to the increased power in the 115 Hz > audio passband. > > Unfortunately at this time I can't run autodecoders with the heavier > code, the available PC took many minutes on full throttle just to > crunch through the flat-phase trials. > > 73 and good luck, > Markus > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: DK7FC > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Di, 11. Dez 2018 18:07 > Betreff: LF: EbNaut LF message announcement > > LF, > > Another opportunity for the EbNaut friends: > > *f = 137.540 kHz > Start time: 11.DEC.2018 20:00 UTC (hourly, including 7 UTC) > Symbol period: 1 s > Characters: 12 > CRC bits: 16 > Coding 16K21A > Antenna current: 4 A > Duration: 28:48 [mm:ss]* > > > 73, Stefan --------------060501050404050501040306 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Markus and Geoff,

Markus, thanks for the decode and feedback. How do you explain the minor phase instability in your phase plot? Is it propagation?

Geoff, thanks for trying. The 2nd message is completed already. S/N should be fine for a decode :-)
Are you also new on this reflector? It is nice to see new OMs always and always again :-) I know your call from theWSPR map on LF. Your RX and location must be very good for LFreception!
Which method do you use for getting EbNaut decodes, i.e. what isyour (extended) rig?

73, Stefan

Am 11.12.2018 22:29, schrieb Geoff Hughes:
Stefan,

A good signal here also - however I have been unable so far to produce a recording which will produce a successful decode. I will keep attempting.

73 Geoff G0LUJ

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> on behalf of Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
Sent: 11 December 2018 21:07
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut LF message announcement
 

Hi Stefan,

a booming signal here, as usual. Interestingly, simultaneous decoding of VO1NA is pretty much undisturbed, even though ebnaut-rx claims -14.1 dB carrier-based  Eb/N0 due to the increased power in the 115 Hz audio passband.

Unfortunately at this time I can't run autodecoders with the heavier code, the available PC took many minutes on full throttle just to crunch through the flat-phase trials. 

73 and good luck,
Markus

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Di, 11. Dez 2018 18:07
Betreff: LF: EbNaut LF message announcement

LF,

Another opportunity for the EbNaut friends:

f = 137.540 kHz
Start time: 11.DEC.2018  20:00 UTC (hourly, including 7 UTC)
Symbol period: 1 s
Characters: 12
CRC bits: 16
Coding 16K21A
Antenna current: 4 A
Duration: 28:48 [mm:ss]


73, Stefan
--------------060501050404050501040306--