Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wB5JnCoT005342 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 20:49:13 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gUd4f-0001wM-QJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 19:43:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gUd4e-0001wC-81 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 19:43:08 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gUd4c-0000sd-Ex for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 19:43:07 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A5D160060 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 20:43:02 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1544038983; bh=jyfedbN3/g0KcCBX5m22OQOaZZuOU0KvovUBwP6RI8M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=iuwrISHeelxOhZlYHKLIvxlbeNXL85dNG6zdIn3ZVxhBwGUrvBplxmqS6ZxIEbrUN mbA91gRZMSYnXPnzPJgTTejidTFieuTDkqOcVB5x9NNdGw5XUJwRLlDD4aW29LxRsk 9msA3hKsUHt3Qt4tjTAe3vugw/XSIPf0oG2elAvKZMDt6cEAOrhpTOb6tTvc89l6Rl R6ox+4G0jZj77e0RUA1SzbShyuwwXpsNWL3GHiyr8YJCWjwrwhQkjOxItoGmxfWzaO PmD+QfBHmPtDDRd9zx1wu1hwfJQHJsFitTtKruLnV95UKRHoGo1NQYITMwoJgfNOD/ Nq25sZsfwUhlw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4398Fc12Dnz6tnx for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 20:39:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5C082969.9080400@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 20:39:21 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <484123806.20181205171236@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <484123806.20181205171236@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Chris, Try something below 137.400 kHz and above 137.200 kHz. I will watch for you. Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: JT9-1 questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Chris, Try something below 137.400 kHz and above 137.200 kHz. I will watch for you. 73, Stefan PS: Did you see me last reply email? Am 05.12.2018 18:12, schrieb Chris Wilson: > > Hello LF'ers > > If I can get my TS-590 and squarer to work safely i will have a go at > JT9-1 tonight, but I need to know dial frequency and audio TX > frequency that is admissable on LF, can someone advise please? if it > were as near to my normal 137.550 it would save a lot of messing out > in the rain :) Thanks. > >