Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wACKh69U028519 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:43:14 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gMIy9-0003pe-7S for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:38:01 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gMIxC-0003pV-A9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:37:02 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gMIx8-0002h5-H9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:36:59 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1AC16005E for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:36:49 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1542055009; bh=EtZXs2ZYeosRsw+VzQAXd/LJOnCJpWaLXv7C8hVdqCc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=ry/y75jMqZ9raYjfZnICYFA46rtLG7BBgJTE34gsrg9/YRRILBfRzOA1tGYKh5kV4 AcDd/vTWekJOxJmi7+vohjXMVFlw5O4khJIiUz2CoRZvIjdosVxy0iTgkAeG/q2DSd IwCR14o/GfbqXd6yMB4pIHGxjl7IAs5cAwi/4hRgPIWayqcNYebxEcHqaggRClj+Y1 PQz1xE5wQZy2B0ICA5/aPipdw15Ck/J98CjBtNOG+xxiM/Uq5gpuNAh3sgvIuUdSaP Smiic9Q1sIMyVl9k3IbMNpneqA92FvJUPyPXpsu5OT2+0rMRjP27oobglInLCN/G1D 1S3Yz32ACrm9w== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42v2bz6x2Nz6tmL for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:36:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5BE9E45F.10706@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:36:47 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <338375010.1140187.1542053204258.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <338375010.1140187.1542053204258@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, No problem, don't worry about the QRM. It is normal that we interfere each other sometimes. I'm sure i also reduced your WSPR SNR at DL0AO if you were so close to me ;-) Tonite i'll stay at 137.620 kHz. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f64a6c8ea7591cecbecc6db95ffdd328 Subject: Re: LF: Re: LF EbNaut tonite Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, No problem, don't worry about the QRM. It is normal that we interfere each other sometimes. I'm sure i also reduced your WSPR SNR at DL0AO if you were so close to me ;-) Tonite i'll stay at 137.620 kHz. 73, Stefan Am 12.11.2018 21:23, schrieb N1BUG: > Stefan, Markus, > > If you want to stay on 137.465 let me know... I can shut my > transmitter off for the night. Sorry I didn't think to do that last > night. I thought I was far enough away (in kilometers) from anyone > with interest in EbNaut... > > Paul N1BUG > > > On 11/12/18 3:06 PM, Markus Vester wrote: > >> Hi Stefan, >> >> yes I would like to qso and set up a second autodecoder, but with >> my current setup I can't receive EbNaut above 137555 Hz. >> >> 73, Markus >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: DK7FC >> An: rsgb_lf_group >> Verschickt: Mo, 12. Nov. 2018 >> 20:45 Betreff: Re: LF: Re: LF EbNaut tonite >> >> LF, >> >> Another opportunity tonite: >> >> f = 137.620 kHz Start time: 12.NOV.2018 20:00 UTC (hourly, until >> including 6 UTC) Symbol period: 1 s Characters: 20 CRC bits: 16 >> Coding 8K19A Antenna current: 4 A Duration: 20:32 [mm:ss] >> >> Markus, do you like to join? We could try a QSO with these >> settings. >> >> Note the different TX frequency. It is outside the WSPR-2 band, >> but notto far. Unfortunately i cannot tune the resonance >> frequency because my coildoes not have a variometer coil at the >> moment. So i need to stay inthat range. 137.62 is just the >> resonance spot right now. >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> >> Am 12.11.2018 13:52, schrieb Rob Renoud: #yiv8286362132 body >> {margin:0.7em;}#yiv8286362132 body.yiv8286362132OECFntDef, >> #yiv8286362132 body.yiv8286362132OECFntDef div >> {font-family:Arial, Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, >> sans-serif;font-size:10pt;} Jay and Stefan, I attempted my >> first over the airEbNaut decodes last night using two separate >> receive systems. Allappeared well but find that both instances >> of SL did not save theentire wave file for each receive period >> but truncated it to about165K. Will play with that today as have >> not experienced that inprevious end-to-end sessions in the shack. >> Well done and thanks for puttingthe EbNaut signal on the air, >> Stefan. Thanks for posting yours, Jay,as it confirms I should >> have been able to copy all. Look forward toanother opportunity. >> 73, Rob - K3RWR From: jrusgrove@comcast.net Sent: Monday, >> November 12, 2018 1:34 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonite Stefan Copy of your >> message below. The message is not blacked out sinceit was already >> available on Marcus's automated decoder. Nice to seerank 0. Will >> be looking for Marcus next! Jay W1VD ----- Original Message >> ----- From: DK7FC Reply-To: >> To: >> Sent: 11/11/2018 2:01:37 PM Subject: Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonite PS: >> The message is transmitted from a SpecLab instance. So you need >> toconsider the +0.3 second time offset, which is relevant at that >> symbollength. Furthermore there is some uncertainty if the >> transmissionstarts at the exact second. It could happen that it >> starts 1 second tolate. We will see what happens. >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 11.11.2018 18:38, schrieb DK7FC: HiLF, >> >> I'd like to try some EbNaut transmissions tonite. Maybe someone >> is somedistance is interested to detect them? >> >> Here is the program: >> >> f = 137.465 kHz Start time: 11.NOV.2018 19:00 UTC (hourly, until >> including 7 UTC) Symbol period: 1 s Characters: 21 CRC bits: 16 >> Coding 8K19A Antenna current: 4 A Duration: 21:20 [mm:ss] >> >> Reports welcome. >> >> 73, Stefan >> >