Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wACKh69U028519
	for <rlg@klubnl.pl>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:43:14 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1gMIy9-0003pe-7S
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:38:01 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1gMIxC-0003pV-A9
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:37:02 +0000
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.91_59-0488984)
	(envelope-from <selberdenken@posteo.de>)
	id 1gMIx8-0002h5-H9
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:36:59 +0000
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
	by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1AC16005E
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:36:49 +0100 (CET)
X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017;
	t=1542055009; bh=EtZXs2ZYeosRsw+VzQAXd/LJOnCJpWaLXv7C8hVdqCc=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
	b=ry/y75jMqZ9raYjfZnICYFA46rtLG7BBgJTE34gsrg9/YRRILBfRzOA1tGYKh5kV4
	 AcDd/vTWekJOxJmi7+vohjXMVFlw5O4khJIiUz2CoRZvIjdosVxy0iTgkAeG/q2DSd
	 IwCR14o/GfbqXd6yMB4pIHGxjl7IAs5cAwi/4hRgPIWayqcNYebxEcHqaggRClj+Y1
	 PQz1xE5wQZy2B0ICA5/aPipdw15Ck/J98CjBtNOG+xxiM/Uq5gpuNAh3sgvIuUdSaP
	 Smiic9Q1sIMyVl9k3IbMNpneqA92FvJUPyPXpsu5OT2+0rMRjP27oobglInLCN/G1D
	 1S3Yz32ACrm9w==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42v2bz6x2Nz6tmL
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:36:47 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5BE9E45F.10706@posteo.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:36:47 +0100
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <338375010.1140187.1542053204258.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <338375010.1140187.1542053204258@mail.yahoo.com> <e75b8e14-b21d-3327-8eba-4da797285999@n1bug.com>
In-Reply-To: <e75b8e14-b21d-3327-8eba-4da797285999@n1bug.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 Content preview:  Hi Paul, No problem, don't worry about the QRM. It is normal
    that we interfere each other sometimes. I'm sure i also reduced your WSPR
    SNR at DL0AO if you were so close to me ;-) Tonite i'll stay at 137.620 kHz.
    [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.3 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium
                              trust
                             [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
                             domain
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Scan-Signature: f64a6c8ea7591cecbecc6db95ffdd328
Subject: Re: LF: Re: LF EbNaut tonite
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false

Hi Paul,

No problem, don't worry about the QRM. It is normal that we interfere 
each other sometimes. I'm sure i also reduced your WSPR SNR at DL0AO if 
you were so close to me ;-)
Tonite i'll stay at 137.620 kHz.

73, Stefan

Am 12.11.2018 21:23, schrieb N1BUG:
> Stefan, Markus,
>
> If you want to stay on 137.465 let me know... I can shut my
> transmitter off for the night. Sorry I didn't think to do that last
> night. I thought I was far enough away (in kilometers) from anyone
> with interest in EbNaut...
>
> Paul N1BUG
>
>
> On 11/12/18 3:06 PM, Markus Vester wrote:
>    
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> yes I would like to qso and set up a second autodecoder, but with
>> my current setup I can't receive EbNaut above 137555 Hz.
>>
>> 73, Markus
>>
>>
>> -----UrsprĂźngliche Mitteilung----- Von: DK7FC
>> <selberdenken@posteo.de>  An: rsgb_lf_group
>> <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>  Verschickt: Mo, 12. Nov. 2018
>> 20:45 Betreff: Re: LF: Re: LF EbNaut tonite
>>
>> LF,
>>
>> Another opportunity tonite:
>>
>> f = 137.620 kHz Start time: 12.NOV.2018  20:00 UTC (hourly, until
>> including 6 UTC) Symbol period: 1 s Characters: 20 CRC bits: 16
>> Coding 8K19A Antenna current: 4 A Duration: 20:32 [mm:ss]
>>
>> Markus, do you like to join? We could try a QSO with these
>> settings.
>>
>> Note the different TX frequency. It is outside the WSPR-2 band,
>> but notto far. Unfortunately i cannot tune the resonance
>> frequency because my coildoes not have a variometer coil at the
>> moment. So i need to stay inthat range. 137.62 is just the
>> resonance spot right now.
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 12.11.2018 13:52, schrieb Rob Renoud: #yiv8286362132 body
>> {margin:0.7em;}#yiv8286362132 body.yiv8286362132OECFntDef,
>> #yiv8286362132 body.yiv8286362132OECFntDef div
>> {font-family:Arial, Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica,
>> sans-serif;font-size:10pt;} Jay and Stefan,   I attempted my
>> first over the airEbNaut decodes last night using two separate
>> receive systems.  Allappeared well but find that both instances
>> of SL did not save theentire wave file for each receive period
>> but truncated it to about165K.  Will play with that today as have
>> not experienced that inprevious end-to-end sessions in the shack.
>> Well done and thanks for puttingthe EbNaut signal on the air,
>> Stefan.  Thanks for posting yours, Jay,as it confirms I should
>> have been able to copy all.  Look forward toanother opportunity.
>> 73, Rob - K3RWR      From: jrusgrove@comcast.net  Sent: Monday,
>> November 12, 2018 1:34 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> Subject: Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonite       Stefan   Copy of your
>> message below. The message is not blacked out sinceit was already
>> available on Marcus's automated decoder. Nice to seerank 0. Will
>> be looking for Marcus next!      Jay W1VD ----- Original Message
>> ----- From: DK7FC<selberdenken@posteo.de>  Reply-To:
>> <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>  To:<rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>> Sent: 11/11/2018 2:01:37 PM Subject: Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonite PS:
>> The message is transmitted from a SpecLab instance. So you need
>> toconsider the +0.3 second time offset, which is relevant at that
>> symbollength. Furthermore there is some uncertainty if the
>> transmissionstarts at the exact second. It could happen that it
>> starts 1 second tolate. We will see what happens.
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>
>> Am 11.11.2018 18:38, schrieb DK7FC: HiLF,
>>
>> I'd like to try some EbNaut transmissions tonite. Maybe someone
>> is somedistance is interested to detect them?
>>
>> Here is the program:
>>
>> f = 137.465 kHz Start time: 11.NOV.2018  19:00 UTC (hourly, until
>> including 7 UTC) Symbol period: 1 s Characters: 21 CRC bits: 16
>> Coding 8K19A Antenna current: 4 A Duration: 21:20 [mm:ss]
>>
>> Reports welcome.
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>      
>