Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wABLThOr020684 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:29:44 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gLxDY-0000hJ-Hw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 21:24:28 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gLxDS-0000hA-Li for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 21:24:22 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gLxDQ-0000Fe-3w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 21:24:21 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C0CF16005D for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:24:17 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1541971457; bh=0W43KfNyWpyfSarHxRMa0jyjEkbEmNpHyFcmO+sgaxY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=exUjI3NXpCqDKG0oi48xNJUvSWAXZsiarwa2xjHlrxp795Z7D3Q6in+NbRGT7W+1F dyW92S+72eSy9N/kqyCgfjL4UbwvZmAXqsbWPx09rRcrQNz0oY6Ldpho5DwNHwia0N W8UUO2wW92LO+Ktox4/rvccx0WVRTic+qVPr6i+M1kNN6wO27gKSyoPPvJpNTykzZ7 QOkW1x94lMnGC6nlBaBjTKfigkmbelKwpO5Hjx8RKJMvCSCB1ABce66d/wtQnGZg+c xhWnSf9koM2Bse3n0JgFLY2FQO7kvmaGBCOe0QQbd4GQ0aqMigqNIL6qdgGQLBXfev JlMjBoJKhiSfg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42tRjD1blRz6tmZ for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:24:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5BE89DFF.7040009@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:24:15 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <579046719.583276.1541970601471.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <579046719.583276.1541970601471@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <579046719.583276.1541970601471@mail.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hi Markus, That's a very good idea. I will try to decode you ;-) Looks like we could exchange 2500 characters per minute, with that S/N ;-) I'm not that fast in CW! 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: cbf9d9751ac5f32708197d03fa6d8d74 Subject: Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonite Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040804080405050406060800" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040804080405050406060800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus, That's a very good idea. I will try to decode you ;-) Looks like we could exchange 2500 characters per minute, with that S/N ;-) I'm not that fast in CW! 73, Stefan Am 11.11.2018 22:10, schrieb Markus Vester: > Hi Stefan, > > will try to reply in the second half-hour slot. Same parameters, > except start time 21:30:00 + 0.3 seconds. > > 73, Markus > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: Markus Vester > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: So, 11. Nov. 2018 20:56 > Betreff: Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonite > > First transmission received ok by the autodecoder: > http://df6nm.darc.de/opds/ebnautresults.txt > Optimum starttime appeared around +0.2 s, compatible with expected > SpecLab delay. > > Best 73, > Markus. (DF6NM) > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: DK7FC > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: So, 11. Nov. 2018 20:05 > Betreff: Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonite > > PS: The message is transmitted from a SpecLab instance. So you need to > consider the +0.3 second time offset, which is relevant at that symbol > length. Furthermore there is some uncertainty if the transmission > starts at the exact second. It could happen that it starts 1 second to > late. We will see what happens. > > 73, Stefan > > Am 11.11.2018 18:38, schrieb DK7FC: > Hi LF, > > I'd like to try some EbNaut transmissions tonite. Maybe someone is > some distance is interested to detect them? > > Here is the program: > > *f = 137.465 kHz > Start time: 11.NOV.2018 19:00 UTC (hourly, until including 7 UTC) > Symbol period: 1 s > Characters: 21 > CRC bits:** 16** > Coding 8K19A > Antenna current: 4 A > Duration: 21:20 [mm:ss]* > > Reports welcome. > > 73, Stefan --------------040804080405050406060800 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Markus,

That's a very good idea. I will try to decode you ;-)
Looks like we could exchange 2500 characters per minute, with that S/N ;-) I'm not that fast in CW!

73, Stefan




Am 11.11.2018 22:10, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hi Stefan,

will try to reply in the second half-hour slot. Same parameters, except start time 21:30:00 + 0.3 seconds.

73, Markus

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: So, 11. Nov. 2018 20:56
Betreff: Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonite

First transmission received ok by the autodecoder:
http://df6nm.darc.de/opds/ebnautresults.txt
Optimum starttime appeared around +0.2 s, compatible with expected SpecLab delay.

Best 73,
Markus. (DF6NM)


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: So, 11. Nov. 2018 20:05
Betreff: Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonite

PS: The message is transmitted from a SpecLab instance. So you need to consider the +0.3 second time offset, which is relevant at that symbol length. Furthermore there is some uncertainty if the transmission starts at the exact second. It could happen that it starts 1 second to late. We will see what happens.

73, Stefan

Am 11.11.2018 18:38, schrieb DK7FC:
Hi LF,

I'd like to try some EbNaut transmissions tonite. Maybe someone is some distance is interested to detect them?

Here is the program:

f = 137.465 kHz
Start time: 11.NOV.2018  19:00 UTC (hourly, until including 7 UTC)
Symbol period: 1 s
Characters: 21
CRC bits: 16
Coding 8K19A
Antenna current: 4 A
Duration: 21:20 [mm:ss]

Reports welcome.

73, Stefan
--------------040804080405050406060800--