Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wAAGbJGd010792 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:37:26 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gLWC9-0001k2-Uk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:33:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gLWC9-0001jt-Er for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:33:13 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gLWC7-0005Ks-Pg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:33:12 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEC5B2400E5 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:33:09 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1541867590; bh=Jmma7oSMsp1bsT07bqxLFsilzYZzRi7VpdiVxHkAzvw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=dkdOEJBwFp6IrzKirUdk2lx0uldNSlN3twvRwM/bEKIwXO52ZH9oubClLngncq9pa xr/KZbqY9CmMhYVPuIqQeKZcqwgdFZD+3NGL8ZiXfq83y4/jf5oVmT8pX00QICul8w EQgk1rQdcDMBerZcmPc/JhDyj96iUnqJxbR70PDRBJaalNpvdP4gMPP3OtqrsNqiDk x2hCZoCebCO5B2mElu5/yDF9jxI11dPH5pcfxscMSPXECUnF/aM+ld3x0eML4h73o6 Na0AEx4ba/SXlmujBI9uDjBgBsRYey84sNvs9/kzxbAH6XQRvN8T6+FZPhJHvhULnS 4kd1PnSCl1gGw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42sjHn345lz9rxP for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:33:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5BE70840.2040101@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:33:04 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5BE36396.3030306@posteo.de>,<5BE3F24E.4020903@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: LF, Now i'm on the air again since several months (or years?). TX power is just about 200 W. Calling CQ in JT-9 (1) on 137.360 Hz. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b99b9f5ebb2905dfac0746d3f825052c Subject: Re: LF: LF JT-9 ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090207070507040104080205" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090207070507040104080205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit LF, Now i'm on the air again since several months (or years?). TX power is just about 200 W. Calling CQ in JT-9 (1) on 137.360 Hz. Rik, thanks for the new software! I run it last night but did not get anything received (but many decodes in WSPR). I'll keep trying. 73, Stefan PS: JT-86400 would be 60 days. I need JT-1440 :-) Am 08.11.2018 19:21, schrieb Laurence KL7 L: > Also jt9 ready > > laurence KL7L > > > > On Nov 7, 2018, at 11:36 PM, DK7FC > wrote: > >> LF, >> >> Fortunately there are several new stations on the air on 137 kHz >> (relative to 5 years ago) which are strong enough to work from here >> in JT-9. >> Last night: >> Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az >> 2018-11-08 00:40 EA5DOM 0.137516 -9 0 IM98xn 1 DK7FC >> JN49ik 1395 27 >> 2018-11-07 18:38 M0DSZ 0.137534 -24 0 IO82ls 0.01 >> DK7FC JN49ik 899 110 >> 2018-11-07 19:00 G8HUH 0.137430 -23 0 IO81mg 0.05 >> DK7FC JN49ik 851 99 >> 2018-11-07 09:56 F1BPT 0.137500 -21 0 JO10 1 DK7FC >> JN49ik 427 104 >> 2018-11-07 17:42 DK6NI 0.137475 -12 0 JN59ln 0.001 >> DK7FC JN49ik 163 266 >> >> >> This is worth to do a QSO party on LF already, but i think there are >> even more stations such as DF6NM ready to TX. >> >> Should we try to attempt some JT-9 QSOs on Saturday evening? >> >> I'm not yet QRV again but could prepare things on Saturday... >> >> 73, Stefan --------------090207070507040104080205 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit LF,

Now i'm on the air again since several months (or years?). TX power is just about 200 W.

Calling CQ in JT-9 (1) on 137.360 Hz.

Rik, thanks for the new software! I run it last night but did not get anything received (but many decodes in WSPR). I'll keep trying.

73, Stefan

PS: JT-86400 would be 60 days. I need JT-1440 :-)



Am 08.11.2018 19:21, schrieb Laurence KL7 L:
Also jt9 ready

laurence KL7L



On Nov 7, 2018, at 11:36 PM, DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de> wrote:

LF,

Fortunately there are several new stations on the air on 137 kHz (relative to 5 years ago) which are strong enough to work from here in JT-9.
Last night:
Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
 2018-11-08 00:40   EA5DOM   0.137516   -9   0   IM98xn   1   DK7FC   JN49ik   1395   27 
 2018-11-07 18:38   M0DSZ   0.137534   -24   0   IO82ls   0.01   DK7FC   JN49ik   899   110 
 2018-11-07 19:00   G8HUH   0.137430   -23   0   IO81mg   0.05   DK7FC   JN49ik   851   99 
 2018-11-07 09:56   F1BPT   0.137500   -21   0   JO10   1   DK7FC   JN49ik   427   104 
 2018-11-07 17:42   DK6NI   0.137475   -12   0   JN59ln   0.001   DK7FC   JN49ik   163   266 

This is worth to do a QSO party on LF already, but i think there are even more stations such as DF6NM ready to TX.

Should we try to attempt some JT-9 QSOs on Saturday evening?

I'm not yet QRV again but could prepare things on Saturday...

73, Stefan
--------------090207070507040104080205--