Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id wA88h9Em027197 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:43:16 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1gKfe6-0001ml-BV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 08:26:34 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1gKfaQ-0001ly-94 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 08:22:46 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1gKfaM-0007ZN-Og for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 08:22:43 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A83B2160063 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:22:39 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1541665359; bh=HLvw1abuUq5SPu4fp9Se9HtXurW4uNufGI8M8+7Z3Ik=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=SEZmC5npXEGJX6VV1V3IS5LaJgKkN92ggSdJWFg39wipEsySifOSTqcPuReJk9ZMO ikBXywew39k8PRLC6uNxjRI4QdPJBjjOyJjO6rXY25mRHKHpbDT+3k2A0cQanHRGBp KHXGopE5i/aDpa/KzDC6aK53MOxtHviX5CgEMnr1Et7ybasc2hP3CT8rJPlod6XqtZ d37fh7l2TxVk1NLTSsLW+ocg9UWLq+e0/SwdvZhEVUWIC7PXDcFX9V52krJJ0AS5ew W8xaQvZsxPaQlfLjqzMZCZQAhxOI33X3/S0fMO2OnTMyjcMwPhEmZGh8Uy8KKiOzfA CU0eLHaMqK16A== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42rGVl131Zz6tm5 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:22:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5BE3F24E.4020903@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 09:22:38 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5BE36396.3030306@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5BE36396.3030306@posteo.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: LF, Fortunately there are several new stations on the air on 137 kHz (relative to 5 years ago) which are strong enough to work from here in JT-9. Last night: Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2018-11-08 00:40 EA5DOM 0.137516 -9 0 IM98xn 1 DK7FC JN49ik 1395 27 2018-11-07 18:38 M0DSZ 0.137534 -24 0 IO82ls 0.01 DK7FC JN49ik 899 110 2018-11-07 19:00 G8HUH 0.137430 -23 0 IO81mg 0.05 DK7FC JN49ik 851 99 2018-11-07 09:56 F1BPT 0.137500 -21 0 JO10 1 DK7FC JN49ik 427 104 2018-11-07 17:42 DK6NI 0.137475 -12 0 JN59ln 0.001 DK7FC JN49ik 163 266 [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f7f918e40888a44a70dddae14bd6a529 Subject: LF: LF JT-9 ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090707030603030203010704" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090707030603030203010704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit LF, Fortunately there are several new stations on the air on 137 kHz (relative to 5 years ago) which are strong enough to work from here in JT-9. Last night: Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2018-11-08 00:40 EA5DOM 0.137516 -9 0 IM98xn 1 DK7FC JN49ik 1395 27 2018-11-07 18:38 M0DSZ 0.137534 -24 0 IO82ls 0.01 DK7FC JN49ik 899 110 2018-11-07 19:00 G8HUH 0.137430 -23 0 IO81mg 0.05 DK7FC JN49ik 851 99 2018-11-07 09:56 F1BPT 0.137500 -21 0 JO10 1 DK7FC JN49ik 427 104 2018-11-07 17:42 DK6NI 0.137475 -12 0 JN59ln 0.001 DK7FC JN49ik 163 266 This is worth to do a QSO party on LF already, but i think there are even more stations such as DF6NM ready to TX. Should we try to attempt some JT-9 QSOs on Saturday evening? I'm not yet QRV again but could prepare things on Saturday... 73, Stefan --------------090707030603030203010704 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit LF,

Fortunately there are several new stations on the air on 137 kHz (relative to 5 years ago) which are strong enough to work from here in JT-9.
Last night:
Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
 2018-11-08 00:40   EA5DOM   0.137516   -9   0   IM98xn   1   DK7FC   JN49ik   1395   27 
 2018-11-07 18:38   M0DSZ   0.137534   -24   0   IO82ls   0.01   DK7FC   JN49ik   899   110 
 2018-11-07 19:00   G8HUH   0.137430   -23   0   IO81mg   0.05   DK7FC   JN49ik   851   99 
 2018-11-07 09:56   F1BPT   0.137500   -21   0   JO10   1   DK7FC   JN49ik   427   104 
 2018-11-07 17:42   DK6NI   0.137475   -12   0   JN59ln   0.001   DK7FC   JN49ik   163   266 

This is worth to do a QSO party on LF already, but i think there are even more stations such as DF6NM ready to TX.

Should we try to attempt some JT-9 QSOs on Saturday evening?

I'm not yet QRV again but could prepare things on Saturday...

73, Stefan
--------------090707030603030203010704--