Message-ID: <5BB3FB5D8C60440FA120B33E3A7EB36E@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <003201cc7c7b$49b879f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4E816F7C.5050407@kpnmail.nl> <E723EFE5D2904394A1F749C9D2F91A6E@standard9dmup1> <4E81B91E.10902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
In-Reply-To: <4E81B91E.10902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:37:28 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: LF: 500
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4074e81c3c42206
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Yes    UK has , now,   10  watts  ERP ,

No  mode  restriction   other  than   'No Voice' .. with the  usual no=20
interference  ,  cipher  and  of course  message  content

As the  experimental  licence is  issued  as a 'variation'  to  a  existi=
ng=20
A licence  , then  two  way  communications are  possible , to  date the=20
100 hz data  limit is not  applicable  .. and  I think  in the light of t=
he=20
ROS-MF  series  , not a  problem should it  befall  us ...  wide band  da=
ta=20
tends to  be  clipped by the  Q of the  Ae's  anyway and seems to  give=20
little  if any  gain.. non  of the MFSK /  ROS HF modes  out  perform  th=
e=20
99 Hz  MF ones on 500 ....unless  a 100%   broadcast is required   then  =
ROS=20
would be of little  use .

While  running  'broadcast '  experiments  , there  was  some 'monkey=20
chatter' over  using  the  licence  to  broadcast , but  as it  was and i=
s=20
experimental, such  conditions  did  not apply .. the  monkey's    soon=20
learned that  beacons can be fun and joined in  ... and as noted if a  DX=
=20
grabber is now  missing , quite loud  chatter  quickly  follows ..

Perhaps the  more medical   out there  may  recognise   this as BMS  ?=20
((Budgie Mirror  Syndrome ))

73 -G..



--------------------------------------------------
From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 12:53 PM
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: LF: 500

>
> Hello Walter,
>
> Oh dear, 500 kHz, another project? ;-)
>
> How high do you expect the chance to get an allocation on 500 in German=
y?=20
> And what are the restrictions in UK and EU countries regarding TX power=
 or=20
> ERP? Is there a limit?
>
> Just thinking about a 1/2 wave vertical on 600m ;-)
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
> Am 27.09.2011 12:32, schrieb Walter Staubach:
>> Jan, you are right. And more is not possible at this moment. We are=20
>> waiting for the WRC in 2012 and hope for better results.
>> 73    Walter  DJ2LF / DI2AG
>>
>
>=20