Message-ID: <5BA3FC5C.7070209@posteo.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:00:28 +0200
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <7aad9ea4-dfbc-dfd4-3494-4643cdeb10d9@bigpond.com> <5B9C0ECF.6060402@posteo.de> <5B9FB6C7.8080607@posteo.de> <5BA3EEC3.1010509@posteo.de> <5BA3F126.2050803@posteo.de>
In-Reply-To: <5BA3F126.2050803@posteo.de>
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut 3 character attempt to VK7
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------020106050506030000080208"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020106050506030000080208
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

...something went wrong. Sorry for the confusion. The late message will 
start tomorrow for the first time. Pity.

73, Stefan

Am 20.09.2018 21:12, schrieb DK7FC:
> Correction: Same parameters as used for the first message, i.e. both 
> messages use
>
> *f = 17470.1000 Hz
> Start time: 20.SEP.2018  19:30:00 UTC & 16:30:00 UTC (daily)
> Symbol period: 10 s
> Characters: 3
> CRC bits: 19
> Coding 16K21A
> Antenna current: 1.2 A*
>
> 73, Stefan
>
>
> Am 20.09.2018 21:02, schrieb DK7FC:
>> VLF,
>>
>> In addition to the message below, which has been transmitted 3 times 
>> already, i will start to transmit the same message into a later time 
>> slot, also using different parameters:
>>
>> *f = 17470.1000 Hz
>> Start time: 20.SEP.2018  19:30:00 UTC (daily)
>> Symbol period: 10 s
>> Characters: 3
>> CRC bits: 16
>> Coding 16K21A
>> Duration: 02:24 [hh:mm]
>> Antenna current: 1.2 A
>>
>> *73, Stefan
>>
>> Am 17.09.2018 16:14, schrieb DK7FC:
>>> Edgar, VLF,
>>>
>>> After evaluating the latest 4 days of carrier transmissions it shows 
>>> that the path from DL to VK7 is quite unstable, i.e. the phase is 
>>> very dynamic.  When applying different frequency offsets, it seems 
>>> that the best start time for a message attempt is 16:30 UTC these 
>>> days. The SNR then peaks when applying a -40 uHz offset, attached. 
>>> Something between 2...3 hours seems to be best. Currently 2 hours 
>>> seem to give better results but 3 hours would be less dynamic.
>>> Based on this data i'm trying:
>>>
>>> *f = 17470.1000 Hz
>>> Start time: 17.SEP.2018  16:30:00 UTC (daily)
>>> Symbol period: 10 s
>>> Characters: 3
>>> CRC bits: 19
>>> Coding 16K21A
>>> Duration: 02:32 [hh:mm]
>>> Antenna current: 1.2 A*
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan

--------------020106050506030000080208
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
...something went wrong. Sorry for the confusion. The late message will
start tomorrow for the first time. Pity.<br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
Am 20.09.2018 21:12, schrieb DK7FC:
<blockquote cite="mid:5BA3F126.2050803@posteo.de" type="cite">
  <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Correction: Same parameters as used for the first message, i.e. both
messages use <br>
  <br>
  <b>f = 17470.1000 Hz<br>
Start time: 20.SEP.2018  19:30:00 UTC &amp; 16:30:00 UTC (daily)<br>
Symbol period: 10 s<br>
Characters: 3<br>
CRC bits:<big> 19</big><br>
Coding 16K21A<br>
Antenna current: 1.2 A</b><br>
  <br>
73, Stefan<br>
  <br>
  <br>
Am 20.09.2018 21:02, schrieb DK7FC:
  <blockquote cite="mid:5BA3EEC3.1010509@posteo.de" type="cite">
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
VLF, <br>
    <br>
In addition to the message below, which has been transmitted 3 times
already, i will start to transmit the same message into a later time
slot, also using different parameters:<br>
    <br>
    <b>f = 17470.1000 Hz<br>
Start time: 20.SEP.2018  19:30:00 UTC (daily)<br>
Symbol period: 10 s<br>
Characters: 3<br>
CRC bits: 16<br>
Coding 16K21A<br>
Duration: 02:24 [hh:mm] <br>
Antenna current: 1.2 A<br>
    <br>
    </b>73, Stefan<br>
    <br>
Am 17.09.2018 16:14, schrieb DK7FC:
    <blockquote cite="mid:5B9FB6C7.8080607@posteo.de" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Edgar, VLF, <br>
      <br>
After evaluating the latest 4 days of carrier transmissions it shows
that the path from DL to VK7 is quite unstable, i.e. the phase is very
dynamic.  When applying different frequency offsets, it seems that the
best start time for a message attempt is 16:30 UTC these days. The SNR
then peaks when applying a -40 uHz offset, attached. Something between
2...3 hours seems to be best. Currently 2 hours seem to give better
results but 3 hours would be less dynamic.<br>
Based on this data i'm trying:<br>
      <br>
      <b>f = 17470.1000 Hz<br>
Start time: 17.SEP.2018  16:30:00 UTC (daily)<br>
Symbol period: 10 s<br>
Characters: 3<br>
CRC bits: 19<br>
Coding 16K21A<br>
Duration: 02:32 [hh:mm] <br>
Antenna current: 1.2 A</b><br>
      <br>
73, Stefan<br>
    </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------020106050506030000080208--