Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w858Sp74001843 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:28:55 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fxT6S-0002ZV-VR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 09:23:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fxT6Q-0002ZM-B1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 09:23:54 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fxT6O-00023M-KQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 09:23:53 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E7C22106F for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:23:47 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1536135830; bh=x+p4vGCk7EcMMS2JoOIGENALrNpw1Wb+MGzCwYqoLKA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=AVR2sNe0yC3GDsdi73YyJeysFp5PK2UpjyYSzz0Ug3asxEUUSsIYLLJzVJIM/gqu/ JmDHKnc1/iQDzt20oO/A2C67hdQ/xKiULVMCI3dXv0TRug4IF0I7S5PBCmJRRqXOpr yfQE64E2agEZauhJCelAg8jneX8CIud8Ve/bhxOV0AUrjmTROzi9EPsS9w0DZlmfjm ftYZYIP7dJumSHmCJNyRpG4mdSShJ4zBtGyyrUgTI1kUDXxys3J2eplKZRkQ6maOkd xx1b/XHXweyHTg8Ka7Sh3JqTUMujcdqRTYHUaNH3xmWWts2WT2xTQzYcDfz/CTUl8Q HpwKGqX24VDBA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 424xYZ6yw9z9rxM for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:23:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5B8F9291.7090601@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 10:23:45 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <165a8bb827e.marcocadeddu@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <165a8bb827e.marcocadeddu@tin.it> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Paul, did the LF loss resistance drop after mowing the grass? Someone should try to roll out household aluminium foil completely within a radius of the height of the antenna to see how it loweres the losses :-) Not so expensive actually. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0 Subject: Re: R: LF: Antenna environment changes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Paul, did the LF loss resistance drop after mowing the grass? Someone should try to roll out household aluminium foil completely within a radius of the height of the antenna to see how it loweres the losses :-) Not so expensive actually. 73, Stefan Am 05.09.2018 09:56, schrieb marcocadeddu@tin.it: > .. a wingbeat of a butterfly.. > > be careful to move around the antenna and touch metal parts while > transmitting Paul it is a very "reactive" area not only for the field > strenght concept :-)) > I guess that the pipe laying on the ground it is part of the ground > itself (maybe improving it ) when you rise it from ground level and > eventually connect to other existing metal parts you really make > change in the environment of the antenna (it is like to tophat wires > moving in the space when wind blows) > > 73, Marco IK1HSS > > ----Messaggio originale---- > Da: paul@n1bug.com > Data: 5-set-2018 1.09 > A: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org", > "rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk", > "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer > bands" > Ogg: LF: Antenna environment changes > > Subtitle: Be careful what you do in the vicinity of your LF antennas... > > I had a 14m length of aluminum tube (proposed 30 meter rotatable > dipole) laying on the ground just under one end of the top hat of > the LF antenna. Today I picked it up and moved it about 20 meters > away. To get it off the ground for mowing, I ran it through the > lattice of a short tower (9m) that is not at all under the LF top > hat. I placed it about 2m above ground. This caused the LF antenna > resonance to change so much I could not retune with the variometer! > It was quite a large shift in resonant frequency. > > I then experimented with moving the piece of aluminum tube around. > It seems I can lay it on the ground anywhere I want with no affect > to the LF antenna. But put it one or two meters above ground > connected to another tower or mast and the LF antenna is drastically > changed. > > I must remember not to move any pieces of metal around while the > beacon is active! :-) > > Paul > > >