Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w7ODgx62018603 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:43:00 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ftCIp-0001uA-Tp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:39:03 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ftCIp-0001u1-JI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:39:03 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1ftCIn-00072K-PD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:39:02 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB0F21052 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:38:53 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1535117933; bh=eY6C80WFi3j6C1o4a2gq566zMv1afMW8hp31hHZ4F9w=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=U/bM8zrPZ/8jx7k9zHhAiGzuqb79NGl4wECv1mwxwVJj6lBIQmSdqaZIgDQOAURHw rvUXKztp69XrN63vcJuu45B2zUxG6FBuV0MTWH6eFUkegeMcxSvqedkhHUZea9Yxye 79PQRzf+T1p42Ooagd2AkUUHl1fEfzx/T7DMIX5qMn2M836mjYpVLIl187iYUP7u7i gO/xFME0VMNCXmysPIe3pYc6zEGjppG9vqH1tmBctit5kTZsQRG3nMzoG7lrgKt1x3 FcaTAfUtHfFmSduLfKEIYNoSGO3UdcYdmJNM/8uroQlNbooCa5SP/05Cp/LTajm+u8 Cby4LG659qP7A== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 41xj6j1QjSz9rxH for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:38:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5B800A6C.2010805@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:38:52 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5B7ACEC4.2090304@posteo.de> <5B7ACF5B.1020303@posteo.de> <5B7D83AE.1060102@posteo.de> <5a88c8ad-232f-4b12-2e04-6f2a6d9ad155@abelian.org> <5B7E6388.2030704@posteo.de> <6DB8451D7F3D3947A5918808A59621EA085CFAA3@servigilant.vigilant.local> <608fe107-837a-e8c1-4c45-13919f8caddd@bigpond.com> <5B7FF3EE.9020508@posteo.de> <395b1af9-1c47-84eb-eb0a-36f8c4853606@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <395b1af9-1c47-84eb-eb0a-36f8c4853606@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Thanks Paul, that's cool! Quite some QSB. I assume it is rather the noise than the signal that changed. Yesterday my "should be fine for QRSS-60" was a quick mis-calculation. It must be QRSS-600. For winther i think we are at least 10 dB better. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [185.67.36.66 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: bb61bee384896e075004ae5ec954ddd2 Subject: Re: VLF: New experiments on 17.47 kHz planned... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Thanks Paul, that's cool! Quite some QSB. I assume it is rather the noise than the signal that changed. Yesterday my "should be fine for QRSS-60" was a quick mis-calculation. It must be QRSS-600. For winther i think we are at least 10 dB better. 73, Stefan Am 24.08.2018 15:28, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > Spectrograms of 22nd and 23rd, > > http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/180824a.png > > http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/180824b.png > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >