Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w6TE9D57009315 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:09:16 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fjmH1-00070x-As for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 15:02:15 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fjmGR-00070o-Nh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 15:01:39 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fjmGP-0001Hd-3d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 15:01:37 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CAB820F7A for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:01:33 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1532872894; bh=0OaV6vSTVAVHUXY3LnstNovtXYeYvH3iEZwcQDrappY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=pA8NEJx7D4hKkA0Adpk1Jlp2znQpYzKIXM5WraT76cBCua3GBstUlWCrZU+nvMdES 2mCRpAKkPxSpIUKDfYxljp80Ucrbt9K0TMwnjF0BaC4Ugf7KD40L4VazP527M/dG19 YoZyQH3aUmLLnDDeeDcJEojqnAiNb2fIljOZYpoPwJAxOKFXBma4+J5X9nZEXmAsDq 8DGSGEyjLer+X47gZSBfjFOFhI6AiW1HGXIIGmJzmOmD1J6PsSDthkSwM/sC9CB3Na BkN1b/s1w98UdlAPqNVd/dRjlA8vc4fmXEy9uIGHgnVgnrzXK1TKyZz1W5GOWHxrbA UQnXhlPRIwhmQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 41dkrs3kWsz9rxK for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:01:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5B5DC8BC.9030601@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:01:32 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5B54CCCB.6060903@posteo.de> <5B59E687.5030805@posteo.de> <5B5C3ABF.3030809@posteo.de> <5B5C4A63.3040504@posteo.de> <5B5C5446.30105@posteo.de> <14080281532786049@iva8-6be7d23653d9.qloud-c.yandex.net> <5B5CD03F.40602@posteo.de> <14811811532865577@myt4-415a3339794b.qloud-c.yandex.net> In-Reply-To: <14811811532865577@myt4-415a3339794b.qloud-c.yandex.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Roman, VLF, I transmitted pure carriers each time. It was just a first test. Today i've done a second experiment, this time using a 900m long wire! So the wire should have about 125 Ohm DC resistance. I measured 220 mA DC at 38.4 V, so the overall loss is 175 Ohm. Very interesting; the ground loss resistance stays at 50 Ohm although the distance between the electrodes has doubled! If i would use the 0.75 mm loudspeaker cable then i can reduce the losses by 100 Ohm which is more than 50 %, so i will gain 3 dB at the same output power! Then with a switch mode PA having nearly 100% efficiency i may gain 2 dB more (mmy lonear mode PA was not well matched today and quite warm). So maybe i can reach 1 A antenna current with just 75 watts??!!! Today i tuned to 550 mA antenna current again, at 8270 Hz. With the scope, i measured the phas, it was more inductive than yesterday. I actually found a 1 uF MKP-10 cap in my car and switched it in series to the antenna. This improved the phase slightly. Then i also found a low pass filter for 137 kHz, the pypical pi configuration, i.e. it acts as 4*22 nF in parallel here on this frequency. Switching this in series leads to a low current, so the C is to small. So for the next experiment i'm preraring a switchable C network (47n, 100n, 220n, 470n, 1u, 2.2u, 4.7u). It will be even more necessary when i lower the wire resistance (higher Q). Well, today the QRN was much lower, especially for the 2970.005 Hz transmission period. Yesterday this was totally buried in the noise on my RX on the tree. But today! I transmitted another 90 minutes with much lower QRN background. I already have a clear spectrum peak but i like to try to improve it a bit more before presenting it here. Todays carrier transmissions: 8270.000 Hz : 08:12...09:33 UTC 2970.005 Hz : 09:42...11:15 UTC [...] Content analysis details: (-2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.3 PLING_QUERY Subject has exclamation mark and question mark 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 2015a9c9c70c0326c96b00c8a41f50f5 Subject: Re: VLF: Earth antenna transmissions on a guide rail?!?? 2nd day... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=PLING_QUERY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Roman, VLF, I transmitted pure carriers each time. It was just a first test. Today i've done a second experiment, this time using a 900m long wire! So the wire should have about 125 Ohm DC resistance. I measured 220 mA DC at 38.4 V, so the overall loss is 175 Ohm. Very interesting; the ground loss resistance stays at 50 Ohm although the distance between the electrodes has doubled! If i would use the 0.75 mm loudspeaker cable then i can reduce the losses by 100 Ohm which is more than 50 %, so i will gain 3 dB at the same output power! Then with a switch mode PA having nearly 100% efficiency i may gain 2 dB more (mmy lonear mode PA was not well matched today and quite warm). So maybe i can reach 1 A antenna current with just 75 watts??!!! Today i tuned to 550 mA antenna current again, at 8270 Hz. With the scope, i measured the phas, it was more inductive than yesterday. I actually found a 1 uF MKP-10 cap in my car and switched it in series to the antenna. This improved the phase slightly. Then i also found a low pass filter for 137 kHz, the pypical pi configuration, i.e. it acts as 4*22 nF in parallel here on this frequency. Switching this in series leads to a low current, so the C is to small. So for the next experiment i'm preraring a switchable C network (47n, 100n, 220n, 470n, 1u, 2.2u, 4.7u). It will be even more necessary when i lower the wire resistance (higher Q). Well, today the QRN was much lower, especially for the 2970.005 Hz transmission period. Yesterday this was totally buried in the noise on my RX on the tree. But today! I transmitted another 90 minutes with much lower QRN background. I already have a clear spectrum peak but i like to try to improve it a bit more before presenting it here. Todays carrier transmissions: 8270.000 Hz : 08:12...09:33 UTC 2970.005 Hz : 09:42...11:15 UTC Sorry for the confusing email ;-) 73, Stefan Am 29.07.2018 13:59, schrieb Roman: > Hi Stefan! > > TNX! > Whats you TX? Ebnaut or carier? > Wait an other results. > > Roman > > >> Hi Roman, >> >> Here are two spectrum peaks from 8270 Hz and 5170 Hz. I integrated the >> complete transmission time into one bin. I also produced a wav file from >> the recorded data (already resampled, mixed, filtered, blanked) and >> postprocess this into SpecLab now, so we get a usual spectrogram >> demonstrating that there was no trace before and after the transmission >> on that frequency. The file starts 2 hours earlier and ends 2 hours later... >> More tomorrow... >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 28.07.2018 15:54, schrieb Roman: >> >> >>> Congrats, Stefan! >>> >>> Pse inform us with screens as possible! >>> >>> 73! >>> Roman >>> >>> >>>> And another update: The 5170 Hz carrier was running from 10:13...11:19 >>>> UTC. The current was constant at about 555 mA. >>>> >>>> Now my last transmission for today is on 2970.005 Hz, running 590 mA, >>>> on air since 11:22 UTC, running for at least 1 hour... >>>> >>>> 73, Stefan >>>> >>>> Am 28.07.2018 12:50, schrieb DK7FC: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Update: Since 10:13 UTC i'm TXing on 5170 Hz. The antenna current is >>>>> 556 mA and the phase looks a bit less inductive but still inductive. >>>>> Despite beeing in the center of the Pfälzer Wald, i have mobile >>>>> internet access and so i reached my Linux PC recording the VLF stream >>>>> (both loop antennas). Using vlfrx-tools i managed to produce a spectrum >>>>> peak of 17 dB SNR after just 30 minutes!!!! (More later) So it is >>>>> possible with this ground loop TX antenna to transmit on 5170 Hz and >>>>> beeing detected in about 55 km distance! :-) These are two new >>>>> records for the TX earth antenna league :-) >>>>> >>>>> I'm going to continue transmitting on 5170.000 Hz until 11:13 UTC, then >>>>> i'll do QSY to 2970.005 Hz which simply means i change the frequency in >>>>> SpecLabs signal generator driving my PA! :-) >>>>> >>>>> 73, Stefan >>>>> >>>>> Am 28.07.2018 11:43, schrieb DK7FC: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi VLF, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sitting in my car while writing this email. I'm in JN39WI96GX and i >>>>>> transmit on 8270.000 Hz with a GPS locked signal generator into an >>>>>> about 450 m long earth antenna using two guide rails as the earth >>>>>> electrodes on both ends. On each end there are 16 (18) massive T-T >>>>>> poles holding the guide rail, providing a super good earth coupling. I >>>>>> measured that they are connected to each other. >>>>>> >>>>>> The transmitter is on the air since 9:08 UTC running 550 mA with just >>>>>> 75 W DC inout power into my hand warm lossy linear mode VLF PA! >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm amazed about the low losses! At DC i got 447 mA at 50.9 V. The wire >>>>>> is 0.4 mm diameter so it has 63 Ohm. That means the ground loss is just >>>>>> 50 Ohm !!!! Amazing! And i have no efforts to build up a ground >>>>>> connection here, i just need to connect the wire. Since the wire losses >>>>>> are higher than the ground losses, i can get maybe 2 dB more signal >>>>>> when buying some better wire. I already found a source that offers 0.75 >>>>>> mm^2 100 m loudspeaker cable (i.e. 200m wire)for just 13 EUR.... >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW i even have an ugly old scope here which is battery powered. I can >>>>>> see that the phase of voltage and current is slightly inductive, maybe >>>>>> 30 deg or so. So i could series resonate the antenna with some C. This >>>>>> is for the next experiment... >>>>>> >>>>>> The signal becomes visible on my grabber now, in 424 uHz and also some >>>>>> bright pixels in the 3.8 mHz window. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm going to stop the carrier at 10:08 UTC, after 1 hour. Then i'll >>>>>> continue on 5.17 kHz! >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW the antenna , if it works like a real loop, is beaming directly to >>>>>> Paul Nicholson ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> 73, Stefan >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 26.07.2018 17:19, schrieb DK7FC: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> ...i just searched in the old emails and also on G3XBM's blog and found >>>>>>> this entry: https://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/2010/09/vlf-dx-transmission-with-earth.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So that is the best distance on a transmit earth antenna (or ground >>>>>>> loop) so far, at VLF, by amateurs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I had a much lower earth resistance in mind but actually i just got >>>>>>> 0.53 A at 250 W RF power, so the losses were rather 890 Ohm! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Will it be possible to make 55 km distance at 8.27 kHz, maybe in a >>>>>>> lower bandwidth like 424 uHz, with power levels in the range of 50 W >>>>>>> only? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 73, Stefan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 22.07.2018 20:28, schrieb DK7FC: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> During the weekend i am in the Pfälzer Wald again which is such a nice >>>>>>>> place to be! I already installed a fixed E field antenna for VLF/ULF >>>>>>>> reception in JN39XI06 :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now i have the idea to use a guide rail (attachment!) as an electrode >>>>>>>> for a earth electrode antenna! There is a perfect road which is not >>>>>>>> much frequented and where no way is crossing so i could temporary >>>>>>>> install a long wire on the ground between two of these guide rails. I >>>>>>>> would assume they provide a good grounding. They are located on a >>>>>>>> relatively high hill/mountain with stony ground. The mountain is very >>>>>>>> steep there and in some distance, 200m deeper, there is a brook.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> With some luck the ground losses can be near 200 Ohm? Maybe rather 300 >>>>>>>> Ohm. I'm going to prepare things and plan to transmit for some time >>>>>>>> next weekend. If the ground loop actually acts like a loop, the bearing >>>>>>>> should be 135 deg, so it will be in a 45 deg angle towards my QTH where >>>>>>>> my grabber is listening in 55 km distance. That's quite a good distance >>>>>>>> for testing! I'd like to try LF and VLF, maybe ULF it all works well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A BTW the wire length will be 860 m! However there are two guide rails >>>>>>>> in a shorther distance, about 450 m. I will try the shorter length >>>>>>>> first, to get an impression of the loss resistance and to see if >>>>>>>> something is visible at all :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 73, Stefan >>>>>>>>