Message-ID: <5ABA3433.8040508@posteo.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:08:19 +0200
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <79F8DC34-CFC8-4478-BDC1-2AFF165571C5@md.metrocast.net> <5AB9054D.9060200@posteo.de> <A532A357-1F96-4628-92D7-F73E632D72AC@md.metrocast.net> <5AB95038.4080600@posteo.de> <2FDC899B-3992-4B92-913B-A53B25990420@md.metrocast.net> <CANA3B6WyMX5qeRVH1JAL1g-8-rneqtaD+8fUby0NzRNeW0pYhw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANA3B6WyMX5qeRVH1JAL1g-8-rneqtaD+8fUby0NzRNeW0pYhw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: LF: K3RWR LF EbNaut Trial #2
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------060601050704040304060107"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060601050704040304060107
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello Riccardo,

Very interesting, and congrats to the new EbNaut LF distance record :-) 
Most amazing! We need someone in ZL to participate! :-)

It looks like you took the SpecLab predefined EbNaut feature, instead of 
using the FFT export and tools by DF6NM, do you confirm?

73, Stefan


Am 27.03.2018 11:00, schrieb Riccardo Zoli:
>
> Hi Rob, Markus, Stefan, LF
>
> Congrats for recent LF EbNaut success!
>
> Last night, I have decoded your message here in *JN64bw* (Ariano). 
> This is a new LF EbNaut W->E QRB record: *7048 km*.
> UTC 0200, *Eb/N0 = 2.2 dB* (see attachments).
> *
> *
> My rig is a homebrew SDR, clocked by a GPSDO. The antenna is an 
> inverted L 12m height, 36m long.
>
>
> All the best
>
>
> 73 de Riccardo IW4DXW
>
>
>
>
>
> 2018-03-27 1:29 GMT+02:00 Rob Renoud <k3rwr@md.metrocast.net 
> <mailto:k3rwr@md.metrocast.net>>:
>
>     Stephan,
>
>     Thank you for your most insightful, and correct comments.
>
>     I will continue to explore EbNaut as a communications and QSO mode
>     on 2200m.  Your suggestion to focus on messages taking up to 25
>     minutes and containing 15 characters fits well with using EbNaut
>     as a QSO mode.
>
>     I have both Windows and Linux computers - plan on starting with
>     Windows and transition to Linux as I gain confidence with EbNaut RX.
>
>     Tnx & 73,
>     Rob - K3RWR
>
>     On Mar 26, 2018, at 15:55, DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de
>     <mailto:selberdenken@posteo.de>> wrote:
>
>>     Hi Rob,
>>
>>     Am 26.03.2018 19:28, schrieb Rob Renoud:
>>>     Very nice - thanks for you detailed reception reports for the
>>>     hours between 00:00 and 06:00 and, of course, the decode at 03:00.
>>     No problem.
>>     That's the path: http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=FM18QI&from=jn49ik
>>     <http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=FM18QI&from=jn49ik>
>>     Not bad for the first attempt and such a message in rather poor
>>     conds!
>>
>>>     I believe the tests have shown that EbNaut may well be a viable
>>>     QSO mode for LF and that my TX station is working well.
>>>     Implementing RX capability for EbNaut is my next goal.
>>     Good. Winodws or Linux? :-)
>>
>>>     In the mean time, do you see a need to continue with further
>>>     EbNaut Trial transmissions from my station?
>>     For me it is fine. And you know that it's working. In the end it
>>     is your decision, if you like, then continue.
>>
>>     EbNaut needs a stable phase and it could be interesting to see
>>     how regular a reasonably phase stability can be expected.
>>     I would focus on messages taking up to 25 minutes and contain 15
>>     characters because this could be a useful choice for later QSO
>>     modes using 30 minute sequences.
>>
>>     Also you never know who's trying to decode you. People are
>>     different. Some say "I'm now preparing my RX to receive you" and
>>     then "Now i am ready to receive you this night" an then "Here is
>>     my report, i have no copy because the local noise was too strong,
>>     but tomorrow the QRM should be lower because...." and so on.
>>     Other people may do the same work and have the same issues but
>>     tell nothing until they can report a successful decode! :-)
>>     If you are on the air and offer a possibility to other to detect
>>     you, you can only rise activity, and that's most important!
>>
>>     73, Stefan
>
>

--------------060601050704040304060107
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hello Riccardo, <br>
<br>
Very interesting, and congrats to the new EbNaut LF distance record :-)
Most amazing! We need someone in ZL to participate! :-)<br>
<br>
It looks like you took the SpecLab predefined EbNaut feature, instead
of using the FFT export and tools by DF6NM, do you confirm? <br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 27.03.2018 11:00, schrieb Riccardo Zoli:
<blockquote
 cite="mid:CANA3B6WyMX5qeRVH1JAL1g-8-rneqtaD+8fUby0NzRNeW0pYhw@mail.gmail.com"
 type="cite">
  <div dir="ltr"><br>
  <div>Hi Rob, Markus, Stefan, LF</div>
  <div><br>
  </div>
  <div>Congrats for recent LF EbNaut success!</div>
  <div><br>
  </div>
  <div>Last night, I have decoded your message here in <b>JN64bw</b>
(Ariano). This is a new LF EbNaut W-&gt;E QRB record: <b>7048 km</b>.</div>
  <div>UTC 0200, <b>Eb/N0 = 2.2 dB</b> (see attachments).<br>
  </div>
  <div><b><br>
  </b></div>
  <div>My rig is a homebrew SDR, clocked by a GPSDO. The antenna is an
inverted L 12m height, 36m long.</div>
  <div><br>
  </div>
  <div><br>
  </div>
  <div>All the best</div>
  <div><br>
  </div>
  <div><br>
  </div>
  <div>73 de Riccardo IW4DXW</div>
  <div><br>
  </div>
  <div><br>
  </div>
  <div><br>
  </div>
  <div><br>
  </div>
  </div>
  <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
  <div class="gmail_quote">2018-03-27 1:29 GMT+02:00 Rob Renoud <span
 dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
 href="mailto:k3rwr@md.metrocast.net" target="_blank">k3rwr@md.metrocast.net</a>&gt;</span>:<br>
  <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
 style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
    <div dir="auto">
    <div>Stephan,</div>
    <div><br>
    </div>
    <div>Thank you for your most insightful, and correct comments.</div>
    <div><br>
    </div>
    <div>I will continue to explore EbNaut as a communications and QSO
mode on 2200m.  Your suggestion to focus on messages taking up to 25
minutes and containing 15 characters fits well with using EbNaut as a
QSO mode.  </div>
    <div><br>
    </div>
    <div>I have both Windows and Linux computers - plan on starting
with Windows and transition to Linux as I gain confidence with EbNaut
RX.</div>
    <div><br>
    </div>
    <div>Tnx &amp; 73,</div>
    <div>Rob - K3RWR</div>
    <div>
    <div class="h5">
    <div><br>
On Mar 26, 2018, at 15:55, DK7FC &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
 href="mailto:selberdenken@posteo.de" target="_blank">selberdenken@posteo.de</a>&gt;
wrote:<br>
    <br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div> Hi Rob,<br>
      <br>
Am 26.03.2018 19:28, schrieb Rob Renoud:
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>Very nice - thanks for you detailed reception reports for
the
hours between 00:00 and 06:00 and, of course, the decode at 03:00.</div>
      </blockquote>
No problem.<br>
That's the path: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
 class="m_-6938005619761327254moz-txt-link-freetext"
 href="http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=FM18QI&amp;from=jn49ik" target="_blank">http://k7fry.com/grid/?qth=<wbr>FM18QI&amp;from=jn49ik</a><br>
Not bad for the first attempt and such a message in rather poor conds!<br>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>I believe the tests have shown that EbNaut may well be a
viable
QSO mode for LF and that my TX station is working well.</div>
        <div>Implementing RX capability for EbNaut is my next goal.</div>
      </blockquote>
Good. Winodws or Linux? :-)<br>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>In the mean time, do you see a need to continue with
further
EbNaut Trial transmissions from my station?<br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
For me it is fine. And you know that it's working. In the end it is
your decision, if you like, then continue. <br>
      <br>
EbNaut needs a stable phase and it could be interesting to see how
regular a reasonably phase stability can be expected. <br>
I would focus on messages taking up to 25 minutes and contain 15
characters because this could be a useful choice for later QSO modes
using 30 minute sequences.<br>
      <br>
Also you never know who's trying to decode you. People are different.
Some say "I'm now preparing my RX to receive you" and then "Now i am
ready to receive you this night" an then "Here is my report, i have no
copy because the local noise was too strong, but tomorrow the QRM
should be lower because...." and so on. Other people may do the same
work and have the same issues but tell nothing until they can report a
successful decode! :-)<br>
If you are on the air and offer a possibility to other to detect you,
you can only rise activity, and that's most important!<br>
      <br>
73, Stefan<br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>
  </blockquote>
  </div>
  <br>
  </div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------060601050704040304060107--