Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w2LL5SND032513 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:05:29 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eykrI-00039I-53 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 21:01:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eykrH-000395-0q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 21:01:19 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eykrE-0006nf-7n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 21:01:17 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B88AD20F42 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:01:13 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1521666073; bh=tASSt/LobD+8F7RcLvw7tbnl2lKsbzM1DcVdN3OEpg4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=f8cyl2GvyhgtKEHKpM4MMoXZxgk3qoz8ieogSCnoWN/UB1ZM3t0g8NCoQZ+qldVCl 4LjsBh/IatxkrQl85T7ytt3e38DCmd7PKEdku4DaCdSy3QNqSxqnQI8FZLqEy9SIjA KKXFu2wBKislrDWC+Oi9HL5R7yPU0Fzrj4PwnmUy97JjNavbPMienLpOg+Lo6Ad52j /L3vbQwiG/+/UUZSVY/vHGsPmUvnqbFMh+fJRT+WlhAil+rTOeOMk/uNFHarV3wWyQ 9khK2/Jur+cs+s75iMj8b58oeubztt181XxnsCQ57omOxK+/2ay0ng9VfZGU1DIYxH 8B6oWIO0RzaaA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4062K50VxSz9rxh for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:01:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5AB2C816.20407@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:01:10 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8a85a7a8-7a1b-f38c-3581-88701aeaf955@n1bug.com> <7D4519A0433A4F14A3D049E57B75A728@gnat> <6654fd57-9c36-a3e4-4acf-650dda972796@n1bug.com> <1UQPrtKflc.2KyOHzTCoMH@optiplex980-pc> <5AB264D6.9040004@posteo.de> <5AB266D1.7050808@posteo.de> <5AB29E03.8090204@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 21.03.2018 21:34, schrieb N1BUG: > I need a better receive antenna for Europe, me too :-) > but I can only build one > this year (it also has to be low cost). I have to make some decision > about what it should be. > If you have enough space, try to build such a cardioid antenna. BTW what i wanted to say, your recent images show a very good mechanical work, precise built arrangements and QRO oriented, very well! You won't expect how rare this is, a good mechanical work in combination with beeing active afterwards, not just for a few tests, but regularly. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c1f72e5acb1277e013f90c915ad7ad68 Subject: Re: LF: Re: 2200m Trans-Atlantic QSO dream... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Am 21.03.2018 21:34, schrieb N1BUG: > I need a better receive antenna for Europe, me too :-) > but I can only build one > this year (it also has to be low cost). I have to make some decision > about what it should be. > If you have enough space, try to build such a cardioid antenna. BTW what i wanted to say, your recent images show a very good mechanical work, precise built arrangements and QRO oriented, very well! You won't expect how rare this is, a good mechanical work in combination with beeing active afterwards, not just for a few tests, but regularly. > When I have high static it usually causes some smearing of the > signal on the spectrogram. I didn't see any of that on Jay's > capture. It could be just some problem that is created by my > receiver. I will have to investigate it. > Which software do you use for capturing QRSS-60 on LF? SpecLab has an internal noise blanker that can be configured to remove as much QRN as possible but leaving as much wanted signal as possible. Not like these HF-TRX noise blankers ('high, mid, low'). > I will stay with DFCW60 tonight, but might change to 90 in next > night(s). > RR, GL. 73, Stefan