From: "Clemens Paul" <cpaul@gmx.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <97CF0B1C-93C3-4667-8AFB-EF3B559FF9AE@iz7pdx.it>, <799A8358-390F-4A95-8B4F-ACF90396344E@iz7pdx.it>, <E1YNSl7-0005ba-U7@post.thorcom.com>,<54E2FF75.7175.12D068@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A234C4CD6@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <42D8BC9A2A8A46C79FF84CD152672225@uwePC> <A59E4DEF4D8C4D609566DD4572D21D9E@Clemens0811> <99BCD526551E4B13A520C09453AEF712@uwePC> <170772064B0E4DEDB031E77B175BC796@Clemens0811> <421F1959F2D342BA912EBA839B6CD5FC@uwePC> <2A449761779C4CD9B2DA26915B1391AF@Clemens0811> <54E3A561.6060007@gmx.net> <34041AE6158A41F6A5FD0D941BC0E264@Clemens0811> <A2D0CDEA90244293A8DAF02AE13F0ED3@uwePC> <E2974873821B4091B34B1D72C54D1C0C@Clemens0811> <0F0E3CDC942D4E5C892E91B5A0ACD5BC@uwePC> <035419E6F8C247F5B9C9C6B64F69392B@Clemens0811> <778BF068A3CC42C59FC5EDD1D898CF17@uwePC> <54E4CA62.30307@gmail.com> <B4FA8911094E4966992393EBCC51A03E@White> <E6DC3E5CEC7E4892BF0F986B989304F9@uwePC>
In-Reply-To: <E6DC3E5CEC7E4892BF0F986B989304F9@uwePC>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:47:02 +0100
Message-ID: <5AA58296D5D54B9DBC9E4D131D6AC32B@Clemens0811>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Thread-Index: AdBMH11+TeI43N8xSlWQqKtTPCX+7AACP72g
Subject: LF: RE: Re: WSPR 630m
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Uwe,

congrats to successfully debugging.
Now it's time to try again today. :-)
Is the antenna properly matched to 50 Ohm?
If so you shold get some spots this evening, even with only with 1.3watts.

73
Clemens
DL4RAJ 
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org 
>[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of wensauer
>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:37 AM
>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>Subject: LF: Re: WSPR 630m
>
>Yes - Dial was one obstacle.
>As cw enthusiast, was thinking in "CW".
>now I can decod myself and others.
>Need mor power and/ or bigger antenna
> 
>73
>Uwe
> 
>From: Markus Vester <mailto:markusvester@aol.com>  
>Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:25 PM
>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org 
>Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 630m
> 
>If you receive yourself, wspr(x) will decode and display your 
>own callsign locally, but the spots won't appear in the 
>wsprnet database. You could circumvent this by modifying your 
>callsign in the wsprx setup dialog (eg. something like 
>DK1KQ/2), but normally this is not very useful.
> 
>BTW those unid dashes on 136.7 kHz actually looked a bit like 
>failed 33% wspr transmissions, except for wrong frequency, 
>missing modulation, and slightly short. 
> 
>73, Markus
> 
>
>
>From: DK7FC <mailto:73dk7fc@googlemail.com>  
>Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 6:22 PM
>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org 
>Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 630m
>
>
>Hi Uwe,
>
>If you can decode other stations, you must of course decode 
>yourselfe as 
>well. If not, there is either a time- or frequency shift. You will see 
>it in the WSPR-waterfall. As a test, disconnect your RX 
>antenna and look 
>on your own signal which should be strong enough. It must 
>appear to the 
>right time and frequency band.
>Maybe you are transmitting 1500 Hz to high? I don't know the 
>Ultimate 3s 
>but maybe there is the old problem with that "dial" frequency. 
>"dial" is 
>set to 474.200 kHz. Just try that to be sure...
>
>73, Stefan
>
>... 
>