Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1M9xAep017715 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:59:11 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eonZg-0002za-KV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:54:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eonZf-0002zR-Ux for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:53:59 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eonZd-00081T-8F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:53:58 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02A620FBD for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:53:55 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1519293236; bh=puQrUN8CuDGd16KA2A+L6zvFE8rfeDbt/oogF413eSE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=PAnmuCY5UjWYD+Yj9K5QVimOg+NxcCcIF7CVWyCy3vGtNy0I7C4mJoDiGM8ZpPP+z L0AVX7bB4F/IeKd5el1BUJ3Aos7V6pYm6K4h4JnJTw1SF9wpQ4z85lfKC40EgiGWAO ekZ0x9KB7Ptv6NHNxePmgOL9PsopuuLJJy2hx4MmjCVt6gFXPFkyjGL5gnRfO6RNWM YrcfvRAVBUMosUiAwWtaakvo4sw4xdrJgvw4inbadRL3xICwPPtqoM9Mguld7ZBfm/ nAzqIEwm7YtZgxNI7UWyM2sEkgD1e3OMYWoUP4G3lM6QV1zyWyA/ThAopENDD4Y9Dl YfwSI/fP9BaRQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3zn8nS5B4kz9rxy for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:53:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A8E932C.70804@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:53:48 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <161baca0753-5ef5-89@webjas-vad145.srv.aolmail.net> <1UQO6uf89q.3CtwcTwkl8J@optiplex980-pc> <5A8E8A7A.8020201@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5A8E8A7A.8020201@posteo.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 22.02.2018 10:16, schrieb DK7FC: > Be careful, it could be that your GPS 1 PPS leaves a 'fence' of 1 Hz > sidebands in your signal stream, at least when looking deeply into the > noise. To avoid this, it is sometimes better to avoid transmitting on > integer Hz frequencies. With "To avoid this..." i mean of course a pretended detection. The really avoid 'this', a better decoupling between the right and left channel is necessary. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1c38f63d01970a2bf149f660c9cb2a37 Subject: Re: LF: K7PO testing 8270.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000209000901040505070804" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000209000901040505070804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 22.02.2018 10:16, schrieb DK7FC: > Be careful, it could be that your GPS 1 PPS leaves a 'fence' of 1 Hz > sidebands in your signal stream, at least when looking deeply into the > noise. To avoid this, it is sometimes better to avoid transmitting on > integer Hz frequencies. With "To avoid this..." i mean of course a pretended detection. The really avoid 'this', a better decoupling between the right and left channel is necessary. It is just a thought. Maybe your detection is real. But there is always that little uncertainty when TXing carriers on integer frequencies... 73, Stefan --------------000209000901040505070804 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Am 22.02.2018 10:16, schrieb DK7FC:
Be careful, it could be that your GPS 1 PPS leaves a 'fence' of 1 Hz sidebands in your signal stream, at least when looking deeply into the noise. To avoid this, it is sometimes better to avoid transmitting on integer Hz frequencies.
With "To avoid this..." i mean of course a pretended detection.
The really avoid 'this', a better decoupling between the right and left channel is necessary.

It is just a thought. Maybe your detection is real. But there is always that little uncertainty when TXing carriers on integer frequencies...

73, Stefan
--------------000209000901040505070804--