Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w1CDPndQ011381 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:25:52 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1elE2T-0005SC-Dl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:20:57 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1elE2S-0005S3-Kz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:20:56 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1elE2P-0006RR-Qp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:20:55 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5BC21372 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:20:51 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1518441651; bh=e0gEiwSrhBpWnkUzGGs0pw1aF0l8m9XTB7Rz0afMeHc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=aAi7u2EriYgEdmaLTJ9Si0GnF/lxl2Py2/ByArxebRLNB0SljwHGZE039hVjM/XUI 3YvZhC/mc8T+GxbMP58ArOkQMb+1aKJfnRHi8NDPJhDBYP/A9zaTQT7CvR3VQTmAjp gA3bcSNIp4+ZARgHGVPP64/K1OnEPW2pA8tfSMZyuwexfOwJNa7Wgf5ExWraecxBso lMmHHIH4iB7RN87zKlZAxee3ZWljosqxEW8woaJM8nschvVXbC0mP9oxBLjOL6vBSy 7xrj0WDphJQm5DIoMKlsFfzuFKZbpfY02FXAdecSufDj7src5C/cX/eihskKHPwT1e drQZhxg1aTX7Q== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3zg5rt6331z9rxj for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:20:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A819497.3080408@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:20:23 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1617f687eea-784c-19ba4@webjas-vab053.srv.aolmail.net> <6db4dbd9-abe5-5864-cc4b-9fdbe9f525e1@abelian.org> <5A80418B.9000005@posteo.de> <1ee6ff26-289c-7c1f-3aa0-ce2b4553ecea@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <1ee6ff26-289c-7c1f-3aa0-ce2b4553ecea@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 11.02.2018 19:05, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > The signal from Markus yesterday measures > > E-field 8nV/m and S/N 11.24 dB in 139 uHz. > > H-field 0.025 fT but S/N only 3.1 dB. > > Obviously the excess noise on H at this frequency is still > there. Yes, there is a lot to gain! I can't imagine that it's just the stronger mains hum component in the H field. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7ab87d4d3ea1d9dcb73a78e83fe4d608 Subject: Re: VLF: DF6NM on 5170.0025 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Am 11.02.2018 19:05, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > The signal from Markus yesterday measures > > E-field 8nV/m and S/N 11.24 dB in 139 uHz. > > H-field 0.025 fT but S/N only 3.1 dB. > > Obviously the excess noise on H at this frequency is still > there. Yes, there is a lot to gain! I can't imagine that it's just the stronger mains hum component in the H field. > Stefan wrote: > > > Tomorrow i intend to re-build the system for 4470 Hz and > > like to try a 100 character message > > Based on the performance of the last 4470 Hz signal I'd guess > it might be more like 15 to 20 days. I bet it will not take more than 2 weeks. > Perhaps 50 characters would be better. We'll have to do > something - there's been no new VLF milestones since Jan 19th! We managed to transfer 100 characters on 8270 Hz / 36 km. We managed to transfer 100 characters on 6470 Hz / 46 km. We managed to transfer 100 characters on 5170 Hz / 58 km. We will manage to transfer 100 characters on 4470 Hz / 67 km :-) And then, guess what comes next! That's the series of challenges. But i have another idea which may be good now, since the nights are still quite long and the QRN is low. In a next email... > I'm glad you're getting to grips with vlfrx-tools. Do you > have a PC to run it on, or just the Pi? I use the Pi just for recording and streaming. I have a PC running ubuntu 16.04 LTS but it is just a dual-core PC with 4+2 GB RAM. The calculations take quite long. I try to get a better PC in some time. > I've been busy making detailed notes on how to set up and use > a Pi with vlfrx-tools, aimed at the novice. Hopefully have > something to post in the next week or so. I hope this is of some help for a few people. There are not many who want to take the time and stress the brain to learn something new, which is complex in the beginning. For me at least, it took several dozen hours until I'm slowly leaving the state of an absolute Linux-beginner! > > Oh, does anyone use Xming to run X-Windows under M$ Windows? In the beginning i tried it but it doesn't work here. > And what do > people use on Windows for a SSH client? I'm using PUTTY. This seems to be most popular. BTW i'm running all my Raspi's on the command line only. The HUI is not activated. It just consumes CPU and power resources. 73, Stefan