Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w18AcXk4026442 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:38:36 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ejjWW-0002HQ-Hv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:33:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ejjWW-0002HH-5V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:33:48 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ejjWS-0006yE-6h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:33:46 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17BB620E1B for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:33:41 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1518086022; bh=W+2PHMiZvZfPeaa9gwPU99BdwCJywvi0wdtDFv76xkA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=b7nPUkKXIjCcSSaWTz3ON8Gmal479inDXoId6Nb+0jqfnrxenK5egT8XzxN8JNRww kNLj4ox3OGhCd7r+pJN02qP0DjlHG5sPNy2aXUWyWlY3RnIt88tI/Pg0RRPpF2tCRE WRE3mznp75aKp+B+C8lytOvIyR+v1f49QJX5IteqaLgBhO9SwXGPnFQascs8ziZp3X Cnn//yl4z3tpc9118m9zaJZ20WzICCe/Fp7SoGhccGY48U+uQxYJiZFeUKWn3q4hxH kFABuVnY30ygC9jw9qPnDQDaG3v8CbULc1vXa7ReIgDfcc3y/XLuOrs2df6EmldxFD gFrxIrRYI8Tsg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3zcZKw2zr9z9rxp for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:33:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A7C2784.6040702@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 11:33:40 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <91B001566F0A442D95AC7AEA56FB7F73@mal> <1518076059795.46076@kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <1518076059795.46076@kuleuven.be> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi MF, Congrats to the recent MF TA QSOs! Is the hype over now? I hope not. I like to try to make a QSO too. Not sure if i can do it this night. I need to modify my MF PA because it has a 4f input (internal /4 divider) so the JT9 frequency shift is divided down as well. Maybe a bit spontaneous... [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 2015a9c9c70c0326c96b00c8a41f50f5 Subject: Re: LF: Re: QSO MF/630 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030502010401020104010600" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030502010401020104010600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi MF, Congrats to the recent MF TA QSOs! Is the hype over now? I hope not. I like to try to make a QSO too. Not sure if i can do it this night. I need to modify my MF PA because it has a 4f input (internal /4 divider) so the JT9 frequency shift is divided down as well. Maybe a bit spontaneous... Last night i copied 0115 -26 2.1 1136 @ CQ NO3M EN91 0141 -26 2.2 1270 @ CQ N1BUG FN55 ...but only these two decodes from across the pond. Were the condx superior or just average? I.e., can we expect similar or even better SNRs from the far signals? 73, Stefan Am 08.02.2018 08:47, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > > Hello Mal, > > > congrats on both QSO's. > > I got one copy by AA1A around 23 UTC, but had to go QRT at midnight > UTC (not retired yet, I had to get out of bed at 05:30 UTC). > > Tomorrow I have a day off, so if condx are as good the coming night I > will certainly give it a try. > > My (estimated) ERP is about 700mW, so rather QRP. > > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *Van:* rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk > namens g3kevmal@talktalk.net > [rsgb_lf_group] > *Verzonden:* donderdag 8 februari 2018 2:40 > *Aan:* rsgb; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk > *Onderwerp:* [rsgb_lf_group] NO3M QSO MF/630 > Tnx NO3M FOR QSO AT 0131 UTC 08 FEB 2018 > ON MF/630M > 73 GL DE MAL/G3KEV > --------------030502010401020104010600 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi MF,

Congrats to the recent MF TA QSOs!
Is the hype over now? I hope not. I like to try to make a QSO too. Not sure if i can do it this night. I need to modify my MF PA because it has a 4f input (internal /4 divider) so the JT9 frequency shift is divided down as well.
Maybe a bit spontaneous...

Last night i copied

0115 -26  2.1 1136 @ CQ NO3M EN91

0141 -26  2.2 1270 @ CQ N1BUG FN55

...but only these two decodes from across the pond.

Were the condx superior or just average? I.e., can we expect similar or even better SNRs from the far signals?

73, Stefan



Am 08.02.2018 08:47, schrieb Rik Strobbe:

​Hello Mal,


congrats on both QSO's.

I got one copy by AA1A around 23 UTC, but had to go QRT at midnight UTC (not retired yet, I had to get out of bed at 05:30 UTC).

Tomorrow I have a day off, so if condx are as good the coming night I will certainly give it a try.

My (estimated) ERP is about 700mW, so rather QRP.


73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T


Van: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk <rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk> namens g3kevmal@talktalk.net [rsgb_lf_group] <rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk>
Verzonden: donderdag 8 februari 2018 2:40
Aan: rsgb; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
Onderwerp: [rsgb_lf_group] NO3M QSO MF/630
 
 
Tnx NO3M FOR QSO AT 0131 UTC 08 FEB 2018
ON MF/630M
 
73 GL DE MAL/G3KEV

--------------030502010401020104010600--