Return-Path: Received: from mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.85]) by air-mb01.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB012-a0784bdde1591ed; Sun, 02 May 2010 16:32:25 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0F26838000086; Sun, 2 May 2010 16:32:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1O8foA-0006ez-SS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 21:30:34 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1O8foA-0006eq-FZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 21:30:34 +0100 Received: from smtp6.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.191]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1O8fo8-0006ah-89 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 21:30:34 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3611.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2E3B27000A8A for ; Sun, 2 May 2010 22:30:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3611.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 21EAC7000A97 for ; Sun, 2 May 2010 22:30:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AGB (unknown [91.109.33.19]) by mwinf3611.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id DF35D7000A8A for ; Sun, 2 May 2010 22:30:25 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20100502203025914.DF35D7000A8A@mwinf3611.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <5A76A381DE2D4D0293EBA81DB52E9313@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <000401cae9e5$cd22c130$0402a8c0@laptopcore2>, <002f01caea22$0cc97f40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 21:30:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100502-0, 02/05/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: ROS 503.600kHz beacon Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40554bdde1552746 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Oh dear ..... well the only time i can think that has happened is with the digital voice system that became D-Star .. now that is very dogey and controlled from you know where .. and don't upset the local repeater group ..or you will be banned world wide from the system .. nice .. pactor that's licensed , my pk232 has a serial number , Georges sv6agp ? packet engine , yes a lot of hams gave an input , but the working version is free along with other useful thing's .... but lot of people use software that's secret with nc access to the source code ...Im using it now .. win-xp pro and all the other variations ...remember when win-95 first came out .. was not long before some one caught it doing ET-Phone home .. not surprised there is a little paranoia about ! I you look at the comments posted on other groups about this .. you will see things got a little out of hand ..... G3PLX took a lot of flack when he introduced psk31 .. and that was from the then gpo , as 'it' was a secret code system etc .. this time it looks like the roles are reversed ! G .. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Jacek Lipkowski" Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 8:33 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: ROS 503.600kHz beacon > > On Sun, 2 May 2010, mal hamilton wrote: > >> That applies to most EU countries and the UK. This mode is illegal and a >> good way to terminate a licence. >> Those using it are at RISK. > > exactly my thoughts. if everyone rejected this mode on grounds that this > is illegal, the author would be forced to either publish the specs, or to > loose testing of his software by hams. > > actually maybe this is the authors plot - let hams test the software for a > while, and then sell it to some commercial customer (probably not > military, but mine communications perhaps?) > > VY 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > >