Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w0OLTLTl001871 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:29:22 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eeSXi-0000cT-SW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 21:25:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eeSXi-0000cI-BR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 21:25:14 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eeSXf-0006tl-Bj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 21:25:13 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A835E20DCC for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:25:09 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1516829109; bh=GB9ANBVNJmVi0vLCBBlqXZwegQnb0C2bEzUgVgJHVYM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=UqCSKUaun8eWhc80/j/I386woMCia11jNvmpxFiz7UQa14g120SYc1GA8WX/oMws0 4ll4bW5VcdAwrvqH79M4qlIKF4WxKjPfsrQIgNdgxlizoHBQfPoUXyYRk5/wW4A0fI grz2pWGKH68hqyup10a6DkyIXc6XyI1LUE0ZG0h/qc1NWmTMAZaLfXwhUBGB7LDhB6 +OUmELZUqBM8BduT8YWHICCuRvLOF6XEc4/WaJmmfpFIqt4K6xcNOGboKfUE8tyVKd 890+u5vmUay5wDuEFpmC+59SGDc60A15AXNdCrsRBkjmc7fVidzh6uFnTDjmEbWIRK R2k51WUd2KGtQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3zRdVY19M8z9rxD for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:25:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A68F9B4.8030909@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:25:08 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1UQMKbUxLf.1YzomBGrWIr@optiplex980-pc> <526A3317D69B44E89859D32E2EDE1581@DELL4> In-Reply-To: <526A3317D69B44E89859D32E2EDE1581@DELL4> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jay, Do you know how to stack the individual files by using one of the two available stacking tools? One day i would try to send you a message (CRC 32 !! :-) ) on 8270. This will require stacking. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 131286aabc28dd54c072e5e89638c651 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA 8.27 kHz EbNaut in CT Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070002020208050405000606" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070002020208050405000606 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Jay, Do you know how to stack the individual files by using one of the two available stacking tools? One day i would try to send you a message (CRC 32 !! :-) ) on 8270. This will require stacking. 73, Stefan Am 24.01.2018 22:04, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > Paul > The path from VO1NA to Burlington CT is only 589 kM ... and it's > mostly over water. > Have been attempting to decode VO1NA for a couple weeks now (both 2100 > and 0900 transmissions) and only have that one success. If I didn't > have such an easy time with W4DEX's transmission I'd think there was > something wrong with the receiving setup! (Suppose that's still > possible). There has been no shortage of very convincing false > decodes. Think Stefan is right ... a higher CRC is needed. > Any chance the lack of VO1NA decodes on this side of the pond is due > to the terminator affecting both the 2100 and 0900 transmissions? > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Nicholson" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 2:01 PM > Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA 8.27 kHz EbNaut in CT > > > > > Jay wrote: > > > > > First successful decode of VO1NA transmission 1/19-20. > > > Single night ... no stacking. > > > > > 19/20 Eb/N0 +4.2 dB, S/N -36.25 dB/1 Hz, phase -71.8 *Decoded* > > > > A great result for 1704 km land path. Only a well-sorted receiver > > could produce that. > > > > It doesn't break any records, but it deserves to. > > > > -- > > Paul Nicholson > > -- > > > > --------------070002020208050405000606 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Jay,

Do you know how to stack the individual files by using one of the two available stacking tools?
One day i would try to send you a message (CRC 32 !! :-) ) on 8270. This will require stacking.

73, Stefan

Am 24.01.2018 22:04, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net:
Paul
 
The path from VO1NA to Burlington CT is only 589 kM ... and it's mostly over water.
 
Have been attempting to decode VO1NA for a couple weeks now (both 2100 and 0900 transmissions) and only have that one success. If I didn't have such an easy time with W4DEX's transmission I'd think there was something wrong with the receiving setup! (Suppose that's still possible). There has been no shortage of very convincing false decodes. Think Stefan is right ... a higher CRC is needed.
 
Any chance the lack of VO1NA decodes on this side of the pond is due to the terminator affecting both the 2100 and 0900 transmissions?
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2
 
   
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Nicholson" <vlf0403@abelian.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA 8.27 kHz EbNaut in CT

>
> Jay wrote:
>
> > First successful decode of VO1NA transmission 1/19-20.
> > Single night  ... no stacking.
>
> > 19/20 Eb/N0 +4.2 dB, S/N -36.25 dB/1 Hz, phase -71.8 *Decoded*
>
> A great result for 1704 km land path.   Only a well-sorted receiver
> could produce that.
>
> It doesn't break any records, but it deserves to.
>
> --
> Paul Nicholson
> --
>
>
--------------070002020208050405000606--