Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w0NJUW0R029848 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:30:33 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ee4BF-0004ES-QC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:24:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ee4BF-0004EJ-7u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:24:25 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ee4BC-0001uH-BR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:24:23 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1768820EB7 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:24:20 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1516735461; bh=tqsMBm47IqKm6p1X1qlLI2ZLh6cvDD072RzEOPB4onU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=ERzRl5n5gzmP0fgtCtRiW0bCmawZ+o5EyS+nVLmHtxbFkuyJnb5YQ1ZHQct8uSBjJ SH8MqqkF9CHECyFPN7lrhlH6J6qAUO3syF9sR6Dt/QXcSd2Qp3voNDBpW4qkxRP3Ya fyd/9oogqEBTKlFRHzDHDrTuxHCh/O81hTW9MRad4gtiAUdlTda8AevRfAvDKTAb0p fm+HeyQ/tQwypHDm+6qwwuom3I5JReazfZaJXxVtJQEsjSAA3YRufDOwx0fhdru/JP u2ZC4hjxdxk7RrebRSKTDdL0uGka4Ktab6EqSGDFAC5oTaC2oJWoJlVxVwChu27XPJ EEcp7smuaWfIA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3zQysc2lW7z9rxF for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:24:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A678BE3.7050003@posteo.de> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:24:19 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <160a7a62949-171d-2f322@webjas-vae049.srv.aolmail.net> <8da80498-5842-a9e5-9fbb-e4bdc4cd2b12@abelian.org> <588f41b6-23fc-9dca-3056-595a8a534c59@abelian.org> <5A561089.1040600@posteo.de> <860ab20f-388f-0d71-4d62-e4a804616e04@abelian.org> <1UQMAnbg62.1ffXqtU77ek@optiplex980-pc> <5a00658e-4613-2dad-2801-93f925ac0416@abelian.org> <2492720b-329b-7888-673b-c7946a55be53@abelian.org> <487f1664-cfc1-aec2-153f-ef5b50c16197@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <487f1664-cfc1-aec2-153f-ef5b50c16197@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 23.01.2018 19:53, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > 18/19 not decoded - beaten by a false decode at +9.7 dB! I think we learned from this set of transmissions that CRC 8 is not a good choice for single character messages. Learned from that, today i would use CRC >= 20 buts for single character messages. Maybe it is the stacking which brings up false messages more likely ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: Re: LF: VLF NA Ebnaut Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Am 23.01.2018 19:53, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > 18/19 not decoded - beaten by a false decode at +9.7 dB! I think we learned from this set of transmissions that CRC 8 is not a good choice for single character messages. Learned from that, today i would use CRC >= 20 buts for single character messages. Maybe it is the stacking which brings up false messages more likely ? 73, Stefan