Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBSAF2FK004382 for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 11:15:03 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eUV7t-0000rq-Nb for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 10:09:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eUV7t-0000rh-16 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 10:09:25 +0000 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eUV7q-0003ah-6C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 10:09:23 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A7820E0A for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 11:09:19 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1514455760; bh=H4KoKrmlksakoO6hLEPbcyR2eCcoR1HvwX0BcZ9YA8E=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Z1Xm2yI5lFEfTAYNwCB+ceyriwVFCVZN3U1Oj+O1HiXWLnnGiJjNJ6vu/EPQgmsPT 7/rQUB1pHWqkM+BzvwDIno76UOruT43aOepllKrcogW2ZTsd2nPa7lad3bCHObqn7I 4pjsIiRoIhBhDVVRFFu6qvkK4od3Glqp3727NRrEH09n26mRFfgKbKPQi78ab5K3a/ j0fnMaVKae3Aa+/xnEjSLsTkzNNSl50nOmPx96CwbfghAOug8urRksTr2v2iLKqzW9 UvAJrJxgOl86HQExfX3Oai/WlJtzQ3CgkEkLz9DgpSvQR8qj1n0uyKofpW4iOz2OZ0 Hx0k2Cr2ddnMw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3z6ln90dhTz9rxG for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 11:09:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A44C2CA.6020004@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 11:09:14 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <2dbcd2a8-0109-41e4-c0ca-aada17f54de8@abelian.org> <5A2D886D.5060109@posteo.de> <5A31249C.2040307@posteo.de> <5A326AAE.7020808@posteo.de> <6b23a798-f28e-828c-bd8a-43ba8af0fb6a@abelian.org> <346e5dfe-da5f-79e9-c097-e3012a3b74bd@abelian.org> <5A344E83.3020308@posteo.de> <5A37BB18.4090806@posteo.de> <79b53aa1-0fa7-d02c-34bf-5b2e3b7bdddb@abelian.org> <5A381F2B.7000304@posteo.de> <3871624a-11dc-12b8-853c-8454840ca9ff@abelian.org> <5A398786.7000001@posteo.de> <5A398906.9000806@posteo.de> <6833b8ea-5cf8-809e-364e-a9f47e04bc44@abelian.org> <2572ce8a-49f7-fedb-98d3-6b3147b0d3eb@abelian.org> <9e41cc0f-dbc3-25e1-5413-38d00890d74c@abelian.org> <72b92016-13ba-d45d-61c3-d54f6c9c530f@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <72b92016-13ba-d45d-61c3-d54f6c9c530f@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 28.12.2017 10:01, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > Forest, VA (2415.3 km KE4RJQ) > > > 21/22 Eb/N0 -0.4 dB, S/N -38.0 dB in 1Hz, phase +62.5; > 22/23 Eb/N0 -3.8 dB, S/N -41.3 dB in 1Hz, phase -15.8; > 23/24 Eb/N0 -14.8 dB, S/N -52.4 dB in 1Hz; > 24/25 Eb/N0 0.0 dB, S/N -37.4 dB in 1Hz, phase -34.9; > 25/26 Eb/N0 -0.8 dB, S/N -47.4 dB in 1Hz; > 26/27 Eb/N0 -1.5 dB, S/N -39.1 dB in 1Hz, phase -121.1; > 27/28 Eb/N0 -0.1 dB, S/N -37.7 dB in 1Hz, phase 5.1 *Decoded* > > But something not right about the phase/timing at Forest. These > repeats will not stack. May explain the lack of repeatability seen > at 17470.1 Hz. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f62c7cf8eeb8e5a327b71719e9bffff1 Subject: Re: LF: VLF NA Ebnaut Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Am 28.12.2017 10:01, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > Forest, VA (2415.3 km KE4RJQ) > ----------------------------- > > 21/22 Eb/N0 -0.4 dB, S/N -38.0 dB in 1Hz, phase +62.5; > 22/23 Eb/N0 -3.8 dB, S/N -41.3 dB in 1Hz, phase -15.8; > 23/24 Eb/N0 -14.8 dB, S/N -52.4 dB in 1Hz; > 24/25 Eb/N0 0.0 dB, S/N -37.4 dB in 1Hz, phase -34.9; > 25/26 Eb/N0 -0.8 dB, S/N -47.4 dB in 1Hz; > 26/27 Eb/N0 -1.5 dB, S/N -39.1 dB in 1Hz, phase -121.1; > 27/28 Eb/N0 -0.1 dB, S/N -37.7 dB in 1Hz, phase 5.1 *Decoded* > > But something not right about the phase/timing at Forest. These > repeats will not stack. May explain the lack of repeatability seen > at 17470.1 Hz. Such a shame! Obviously i wasted two weeks of nightly transmissions during the best time of the year to leave a message on a RX site that is not working properly :-(( I'm disappointed. I remember i asked if the phase of the Alphas, JXN and HWU is reproducable or if it shows the same behaviour. It seems that precision VLF stuff is not as easy as it seems in the first view... This is why i run my Alpha F1 (11904.7619 Hz) RDF spectrogram on my grabber... 73, Stefan