Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vBHAXuWk016325
for <rlg@klubnl.pl>; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:33:58 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1eQWAP-0006ev-Ja
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:27:33 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1eQWAO-0006em-Qn
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:27:32 +0000
Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <selberdenken@posteo.de>)
id 1eQWAM-0007Hw-3t
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 10:27:31 +0000
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130])
by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B6920E0A
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:27:27 +0100 (CET)
X-DKIM-Result: Domain=posteo.de Result=Signature OK
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017;
t=1513506447; bh=7G8q+0y5mvqYsRzu/Nxj9X++P1sqBiQ0oKijxIlrbVs=;
h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
b=c8E7dEFAKcfqlVOnm4x4ix8BpdNiJ7M+byd3nMhB7LMOzb+KsiavbqSS/TguJjoPA
kmRdfAFDbL/yRK0m3HA61erpfqPB4lfJomwvRnPS2nwHDxppCn21VLTsS7pXEvuQxT
eI7iCtkpSHt5esUs5oVWuJMr+BucAUB+pT7NTcY45PGSA23iP0BBCj9OqJQW5YGBlv
+2UHd4kIVdY5fAqnMM3C67+bpzRpWEMDT9aO+1K7mmKgLt/g2V7lQC0ReowZTFS2jB
fuzuX3BEmaVsZnvZKqsov7O11SJ2s5MNR9F43UXQwofqEn1i+Jrn2OYklAVE40AXTY
daP+OZy0ZBqqw==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3z00jB57lbz9rxK
for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:27:24 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5A36468B.3010203@posteo.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:27:23 +0100
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4d96a9d4-5f22-7650-872b-6344e9aea8e3@abelian.org> <023201d367cf$8a5761b0$9f062510$@comcast.net> <b22c25ae-1b76-f1bb-1e54-9ecc8143e7c8@abelian.org> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AAAF572@servigilant.vigilant.local> <2166618d-7238-0516-367c-2f917532eed2@abelian.org> <5A20A4EC.4060009@posteo.de> <c0930471-a16b-48ea-ffcb-536ac6e4b9df@abelian.org> <5A2694B9.4050407@posteo.de> <21caec0e-1514-3294-89a3-8569f0c6d443@abelian.org> <27BE047B-55C1-45E1-9BD8-575D5EF7179C@hurontel.on.ca> <4c4d7934-b02f-0c9f-e251-4c5a07086bef@abelian.org> <526a4012-19d5-aff0-0745-4b02a3a134e8@abelian.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1712120859410.14610@plato.ucs.mun.ca> <c834e36c-4f87-4d90-be66-fac9c8c1f6f5@n1bug.com> <5A2FD635.8080503@posteo.de> <807b7164-c345-9650-0c6b-d813b3304483@abelian.org> <0374401c-a9a5-ba61-89e0-15d5ad016ac8@abelian.org> <36a938b7-9db4-7417-26d6-5b4c4eac900e@abelian.org> <5A35A023.5010707@posteo.de> <1f5204c1-f256-f26e-e6dd-a4edc0c8a443@abelian.org>
In-Reply-To: <1f5204c1-f256-f26e-e6dd-a4edc0c8a443@abelian.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Am 17.12.2017 00:03, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > Last night
was -11.0 dB at Forest, stacking brings us up > to -2.5 dB. Ooh, that is not
much. Fortunately your email is from last night, so the 7th night is not
included. I wonder why the daily Eb/N0 is so low. The first 3 char message
'TNX' was at -4.8 dB you said. Now it is consistently worse. Maybe it was
not a good idea to start the transmission 30 minutes later... [...]
Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
X-Scan-Signature: 4d4a9e8f68fb15c54898568240f542c5
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Todmorden receiver
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Am 17.12.2017 00:03, schrieb Paul Nicholson:
> Last night was -11.0 dB at Forest, stacking brings us up
> to -2.5 dB.
Ooh, that is not much. Fortunately your email is from last night, so the
7th night is not included.
I wonder why the daily Eb/N0 is so low. The first 3 char message 'TNX'
was at -4.8 dB you said. Now it is consistently worse. Maybe it was not
a good idea to start the transmission 30 minutes later...
I'll keep trying...
73, Stefan